[Allegiance]

Originally Posted by Mrs. Robinson

Bingo, Cold! You are right on target.

I find it so interesting that we pay her salary and she works for Morse. In reality, she could care less about the residents.

Originally Posted by ColdNoMore

Position description:

Primary puppet of the developer who is assigned to look like she cares about the residents, but whose primary function...is to promote whatever the developer wants to do and make you think it is always the right thing.

Thank you for informing us on how she feels about us.

The Paradox of Empathy | Issue 52 | Philosophy Now

[Taltarzac725]

Originally Posted by jblum315

I think Ms. Tutt works for the developer, and I think she works awfully hard and tries to be fair. Nuff said.

They do seem to try to meet the needs of the home owners here.

[PennBF]

To keep the subject simple. There are 2 ways to pay for an expense in The Villages. (1) Your amenities which have a not to exceed 3% annually, and (2) Project wide to be used only for maintenance and repair and have no limit and is charged to you at tax time.
The park near 466 and Morris Blvd. was paid for out of the project wide fund and it was not either maintenance or repair and therefore avoided the cap placed on the amenities bucket and it was added billing to the residence through their taxes. It would take the Developer's knowledge to approve this expense and gives a good indication as to how loose and how Ms Tutt use the residents money as discretionary for her usage or to approve. Regardless of whether the Park was a good idea it was an abuse to use PW funds as discretionary as opposed to the controls to prevent residents taxed to use something because there are no caps?? If this was done here how many other abuses may be a part of the residents charges??

[biker1]

My deed restrictions refer to the amenities fee increases being tied to the CPI. There is no reference to a limit of 3%.

Originally Posted by PennBF

To keep the subject simple. There are 2 ways to pay for an expense in The Villages. (1) Your amenities which have a not to exceed 3% annually, and (2) Project wide to be used only for maintenance and repair and have no limit and is charged to you at tax time.
The park near 466 and Morris Blvd. was paid for out of the project wide fund and it was not either maintenance or repair and therefore avoided the cap placed on the amenities bucket and it was added billing to the residence through their taxes. It would take the Developer's knowledge to approve this expense and gives a good indication as to how loose and how Ms Tutt use the residents money as discretionary for her usage or to approve. Regardless of whether the Park was a good idea it was an abuse to use PW funds as discretionary as opposed to the controls to prevent residents taxed to use something because there are no caps?? If this was done here how many other abuses may be a part of the residents charges??

[PennBF]

The restriction is cap'd at 3% or the CPI whichever is lower.

[graciegirl]

Originally Posted by Allegiance

Thank you for informing us on how she feels about us.

The Paradox of Empathy | Issue 52 | Philosophy Now

I have diligently read this article about Hector and Anita and the Taoist philosopher Chuang Tsu.

I cannot make the corollary. Do you like Janet Tutt? If so, why?

[Allegiance]

Originally Posted by graciegirl

I have diligently read this article about Hector and Anita and the Taoist philosopher Chuang Tsu.

I cannot make the corollary. Do you like Janet Tutt? If so, why?

I am sorry for having you read that whole article, I was just making the point that the two posters were telling us about Janet's inner thought process. Which of course is impossible and I disagree with their conclusion.

I think Tutt is doing a great job and that she and the Morse family care about us.

You have implied that there is some mismanagement north of 466. I would like to learn more about that.

I FEEL in my heart that many of these chronic complainers don't live in the villages and/or they have a financial interest in a competitor.

You are a villager, people know it.

I more follow the philosopher / mathematician Pascal

Pascal's Wager - Wikipedia

And belive it or not, I have tried to take your advice as well, just not well enough so far.

[EPutnam1863]

Originally Posted by dbussone

I believe the Disney parks/properties in Orlando are set up in a manner similar to TV. Imagine that, two very well run organizations - no hysterics or whining on the hour.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

You may be interested in reading the book Celebration U.S.A.

[EPutnam1863]

Originally Posted by Villageswimmer

Agree. Her job is difficult and she handles it with poise and grace. I admire her strength. I don't know how anyone could watch her in action and not. Namaste.

In order to survive such a tough job, it may be necessary to turn off one's emotions.

[dbussone]

Originally Posted by EPutnam1863

You may be interested in reading the book Celebration U.S.A.

I have not heard of that. I will, thanks.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

[biker1]

Please provide a reference as my deed restrictions do not say that.

Originally Posted by PennBF

The restriction is cap'd at 3% or the CPI whichever is lower.

[PennBF]

To get a full description of the controls on emenities and Project Wide you may want to contract the POA for a full explanation. You can find the contacts in their monthly mag.

[xlhig]

Thank you for the information.

[graciegirl]

Originally Posted by PennBF

To get a full description of the controls on emenities and Project Wide you may want to contract the POA for a full explanation. You can find the contacts in their monthly mag.

I am not a fan of POA.

[Wiotte]

Originally Posted by graciegirl

I am not a fan of POA.

Why ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk