[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

Yes, I agree. The less informed always choose electric

Originally Posted by SoCalGal

Please elaborate.

Please not in this thread! Search for the countless (and endless) threads on climate change, EVs, or electric carts for the elaboration.

[Bilyclub]

Originally Posted by SoCalGal

Please elaborate.

It’s just the usual weekly arguments. You’re new, but hang around long enough and it becomes pretty clear.

[Rainger99]

Originally Posted by mkjelenbaas

This information is available to view in the internet.

The internet is very large. Can you provide a link?

[ElDiabloJoe]

Originally Posted by Stu from NYC

It is part of the attractiveness of the Villages so helps the developer to sell more homes.

Having said that the developer is smarter than the rest of us having others pay for things he benefits from.

The family is made up of brilliant businessmen and women who have built this great place and this is why they are billionaires and we are not.

Fixed it for ya.

[jmaccallum]

Originally Posted by BrianL99

Assuming he's already decided on Gas vs Electric cart and his dog doesn't poop.

And don’t forget “speed” of said golf cart.

[Phil D]

Originally Posted by Topspinmo

Yes and no the way I understand it? The developers own lake and land under it and land at squares, but nothing above the land in common areas around lake which includes bridge island under the road way or and eye candy on land at squares like water tower and things that requires expensive recurring maintenance replacement, that’s on use. And there nothing we can do about it so might as worry about something else like homeowners insurance.

[justjim]

“These Capitalists generally act harmoniously and in concert to fleece the people”. Abraham Lincoln 1-11-1837. When the Capitalist entity is public you can get in on the profits by buying their stock but that is not the case when it’s private. Back to the OP’s question about the Boardwalk at Sumter Landing…

I suppose a decision could be made to just demolish the Boardwalk and that might (don’t know for sure) be cheaper than building a new Boardwalk. Maybe the Developer would rather put some “skin in the game” rather than have the Boardwalk demolished. Maybe not. I wouldn’t know the legal issues with such a decision as that is above my pay grade. Just a thought.

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by justjim

...
I suppose a decision could be made to just demolish the Boardwalk and that might (don’t know for sure) be cheaper than building a new Boardwalk. Maybe the Developer would rather put some “skin in the game” rather than have the Boardwalk demolished.
...

Just as with the Brownwood windmill and water tower, there is a signed agreement that obligates the PWAC/PWF to repair/replace the boardwalk to its original condition. It cannot just be demolished, it must be replaced. This was made clear by the Developer when a similar idea was discussed regarding the Brownwood structure.

[justjim]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

Just as with the Brownwood windmill and water tower, there is a signed agreement that obligates the PWAC/PWF to repair/replace the boardwalk to its original condition. It cannot just be demolished, it must be replaced. This was made clear by the Developer when a similar idea was discussed regarding the Brownwood structure.

Did we sign such an agreement when we closed on our properties?

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by justjim

Did we sign such an agreement when we closed on our properties?

Only you know what you signed. Even if I did, there is not much public common area on my property to be maintained with PWF.