Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
Talk of The Villages Florida - Rentals, Entertainment & More
#76
|
||
|
||
![]()
Please don't be such a grump. This may cost you less than $12 a year. If you cannot afford that, how are you leaving here in TVs?
|
|
#77
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
|
#78
|
||
|
||
![]()
I appreciate this act by Seco brought to our attention. I believe in charity, but not “sneaky” charity. I went over my notifications from Seco and could not find where I have been notified of their “rounding up” practices. I may have to take them off automatic billing and review in detail each bill if they come up with anything else.
|
#79
|
||
|
||
![]()
SECO Energy is regulated by the Florida Public Services Commission (PSC), as a Public Utilities SECO inherently has more power over their customers than a regular Company and Florida Services Commission is supposed to keep SECO from abusing that power. SECO says they will contribute some of the funds they collect for their Pennies from Heaven Rounding Up Scheme, to assorted Charities but I would wager the lions share goes into SECO’s account to make up for business losses they suffer; from people who have not paid their Electric Bill. Legitimate Charities ask for Donations, they do not have the power to force contributions as SECO has assumed. SECO enrolls all their customers to contribute, and then offer a path to unenroll. I would bet 90% of their customers do not even relize they are contributing. Some of the worse frauds committed each year are related to Charities and Rounding Up schemes.
The Florida Public Services Commission should force SECO to return 100% of their ill-gotten funds to the Customers they took them from. Then and only then SECO might be permitted to ask their customers to contribute for their “Charity”, but they should have to give detailed accounting of where every penny the “Charity” takes in. If 90% of “Charity” Contributions are earmarked to go to SECO, they must inform their Customers. SECO has abused the Public Utility position they enjoy. The Florida Public Services Commission has the power to fine SECO for their transgressions. A through investigation needs to be conducted to see where these ill-gotten funds went, and SECO should be forced to make restitution to all their customers. A good place to start the questioning is: Do any Politicians or regulators benefit from SECO’s “Charity”? |
#80
|
||
|
||
![]()
I called them today, and they ARE returning the money. It wasn't much, but it is the principle! They have restored my faith in them. This “opt out” scheme is quite unpopular and other companies have tried - it comes across as sneaky and enforced. They are in no position to dictate where and how one plans to spend their charitable contributions. I’m sorry they tried - they lost a bit of their good name.
|
#81
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
|
#82
|
||
|
||
![]()
SECO Energy is regulated by the Florida Public Services Commission (PSC), as a Public Utilities SECO inherently has more power over their customers than a regular Company and Florida Services Commission is supposed to keep SECO from abusing that power. SECO says they will contribute some of the funds they collect for their Pennies from Heaven Rounding Up Scheme, to assorted Charities but I would wager the lions share goes into SECO’s account to make up for business losses they suffer; from people who have not paid their Electric Bill. Legitimate Charities ask for Donations, they do not have the power to force contributions as SECO has assumed. SECO enrolls all their customers to contribute, and then offer a path to unenroll. I would bet 90% of their customers do not even relize they are contributing. Some of the worse frauds committed each year are related to Charities and Rounding Up schemes.
The Florida Public Services Commission should force SECO to return 100% of their ill-gotten funds to the Customers they took them from. Then and only then SECO might be permitted to ask their customers to contribute for their “Charity”, but they should have to give detailed accounting of where every penny the “Charity” takes in. If 90% of “Charity” Contributions are earmarked to go to SECO, they must inform their Customers. SECO has abused the Public Utility position they enjoy. The Florida Public Services Commission has the power to fine SECO for their transgressions. A through investigation needs to be conducted to see where these ill-gotten funds went, and SECO should be forced to make restitution to all their customers. A good place to start the questioning is: Do any Politicians or regulators benefit from SECO’s “Charity”? |
#83
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works. Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so. Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough |
#84
|
||
|
||
![]()
I did. Google sent them to trash so until I checked junk mail, I did not see it. Why would they not indicate it on the bill they are rounding up? (Which I can see.)
|
#85
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
Why no notification on the January bill? Probably because by that time, after the seven other notifications, after the change went into effect, it was old news.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works. Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so. Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough |
#86
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell. “Only truth and transparency can guarantee freedom”, John McCain |
#87
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
|
#88
|
||
|
||
![]()
Yep, and now let’s see Seco fix this practice.
|
#89
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
|
#90
|
||
|
||
![]() Quote:
You can see many (all?) your past bills by logging onto the SECO energy Smarthub. But you must already know that if you receive your bills via email. It was a surprise to me to. It took me about two minutes to figure out what was happening and find the previous announcements. But instead of getting indignant and accusing SECO of bad practices, I kicked myself for not paying attention. Then I thought about what the foundation was doing and what it cost me to participate and decided it was a good idea to remain enrolled. But hey, do whatever makes you feel comfortable. Un-enroll from e-billing so you can keep the paper copies to look back on. Un-enroll from automatic payments and instead write a check, stuff an envelope, and tear off another stamp. And by all means, opt-out of the roundup - you'll need that $6 to buy the checks, envelopes, and stamps.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works. Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so. Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough |
Closed Thread |
|
|