[John_W]

We went today about 12:45 and a crowd was waiting outside. We put our name on the list for 2 and waited outside with the others. After about 15 minutes we were seated. Every table around us had bigger parties of 4, 6 or even more people. I also noticed most were having mixed drinks or draft beer, the prices on the menu looked like that could get expensive. I had a basic hamburger, no cheese just onion on a sesame seed bun, it was $9.99. I had cole slaw for my side, it was different, a lot of vinegar flavor, next time I'll try something else. My wife doesn't eat much meat so she had grilled cheese. It was loaded with a lot of other ingredients for $9.49 and she had broccoli for the side, which she said was good. With a sweet tea and a Pepsi it came to $25 and change plus tip. We'll probably try them again in a few weeks when the crowds die down.

[zcaveman]

I figure May or June is a good time to try Square 1 Burgers.

Z

[big guy]

Originally Posted by billethkid

clarification.....the OP said nothing about dogs in the restaurant....for clarification OP said:

"...doggie friendly patio..."

Still part of the restaurant if they serve food and drinks there.

[Bogie Shooter]

Originally Posted by keithwand

I will still leave my 2 little dogs home.
They probably appreciate a little alone time too.

That is the common sense approach.

[rdhdleo]

Ok we just came back home from there. It was crowded but we got table for 2 inside right away. Very nice attentive friendly service. Ok Hubby had the American burger, I had the Philly Cheesesteak burger we had a full order of the onion rings, I had coleslaw with mine he had fries, he had iced tea I had diet pepsi. So our bill was just over $36 + tip! Too pricey for my taste for a burger place. The onion rings were huge and crunchy but had it not been for the chipolte ranch sauce would have been tasteless. The burgers were high quality meat I will give them that and cooked perfect and juicy but again mine was tasteless, guess they don't season anything? he said his was ok. So bottom line I think it is a nice place but I can get full nice dinners for that price. Since we are closer to 42 I doubt we'll be going there.
As for the crowds today I heard someone there say Bonifay lost power so many people headed to Square 1 there were groups of 6, 8 and 14 after we got there!

[Beechie]

OK I'll take the bait.

I for one fully understand the love one feels for their pets or should I say family members. We are dog owners but draw the line on dining out. I know this post is about Square 1 Burgers and we can't wait to try them out.

Now, here is an excerpt from a blog written by Suzanne that is worth repeating. The biggest concern most people neglect to mention...

ALLERGIES. There are millions of children and adults with severe allergies to dogs. It poses a health risk for them to be in an establishment that has pet dander. Should these paying patrons, human beings, be subjected to itching, wheezing, coughing or WORSE just so that a dog can relax under the table? It is completely ludicrous to subject one human being to a dangerous health environment so that an animal can enjoy the outdoor seating. Its shocking that your article completely ignores perhaps the most important crux of this argument � the fact that dogs in dining establishments can cause a health risk for other patrons.

This is not just about the fact that dogs carry fleas, walk barefoot on the pavement, step in their own urine and excrement and then walk into a cafe or restaurant where FOOD is being served. This is not just about the fact that waiters who may pet the dog, or brush past and contaminate their apron with pet dander may get harmful bacteria in another diner�s FOOD. This is not just the fact that dogs may be rambunctious, jump on the table, or try to grab some of the food and destroy the dining experience of paying customers. Nor is it just about the fact that pet owners may pet their dog and then take their hands and touch glasses, cutlery, plates and napkins, contaminating the washing water for restaurant equipment that is used to serve FOOD. This is not just about the fact that, according to the written law, the FDA has banned live animals from establishments where food is served. It is ILLEGAL, however you may try to brush it off or explain it away, those regulations are there to protect people. Not just from salmonella and e-coli, but from the harmful pathogens that dogs naturally carry. It is not only for these reasons that dogs should be banned from establishments where food is served. It is also for the fact that the simple act of bringing your dog into a restaurant or dining patio can cause tremendous and severe health risks for those who are allergic to dogs. One paying patron�s infatuation with their animal should never supersede the health and safety of another PAYING PATRON, especially when food is involved.

[RedChariot]

Originally Posted by Beechie

OK I'll take the bait.

I for one fully understand the love one feels for their pets or should I say family members. We are dog owners but draw the line on dining out. I know this post is about Square 1 Burgers and we can't wait to try them out.

Now, here is an excerpt from a blog written by Suzanne that is worth repeating. The biggest concern most people neglect to mention...

ALLERGIES. There are millions of children and adults with severe allergies to dogs. It poses a health risk for them to be in an establishment that has pet dander. Should these paying patrons, human beings, be subjected to itching, wheezing, coughing or WORSE just so that a dog can relax under the table? It is completely ludicrous to subject one human being to a dangerous health environment so that an animal can enjoy the outdoor seating. Its shocking that your article completely ignores perhaps the most important crux of this argument � the fact that dogs in dining establishments can cause a health risk for other patrons.

This is not just about the fact that dogs carry fleas, walk barefoot on the pavement, step in their own urine and excrement and then walk into a cafe or restaurant where FOOD is being served. This is not just about the fact that waiters who may pet the dog, or brush past and contaminate their apron with pet dander may get harmful bacteria in another diner�s FOOD. This is not just the fact that dogs may be rambunctious, jump on the table, or try to grab some of the food and destroy the dining experience of paying customers. Nor is it just about the fact that pet owners may pet their dog and then take their hands and touch glasses, cutlery, plates and napkins, contaminating the washing water for restaurant equipment that is used to serve FOOD. This is not just about the fact that, according to the written law, the FDA has banned live animals from establishments where food is served. It is ILLEGAL, however you may try to brush it off or explain it away, those regulations are there to protect people. Not just from salmonella and e-coli, but from the harmful pathogens that dogs naturally carry. It is not only for these reasons that dogs should be banned from establishments where food is served. It is also for the fact that the simple act of bringing your dog into a restaurant or dining patio can cause tremendous and severe health risks for those who are allergic to dogs. One paying patron�s infatuation with their animal should never supersede the health and safety of another PAYING PATRON, especially when food is involved.

Very well written. You made a point I did not think of when I emailed the company stating they open themselves to liability having dogs on their premices. Dogs do not belong there. Please present this issue to the company by email. If the FDA says it's illegal, why do they not adhere to this law?

[TraceyMooreRN]

Went there Thursday night- 445ish--was great. Service and food. Although, my friends and husbands burger not exactly to order---tasted great. We will all go back. Specialty drinks on sale 4-6pm I think? Had several drinks, appetizer and burgers--50.00 bucks--I thought it was worth what we drank/ate.

[yabbadu]

Originally Posted by Beechie

OK I'll take the bait.

I for one fully understand the love one feels for their pets or should I say family members. We are dog owners but draw the line on dining out. I know this post is about Square 1 Burgers and we can't wait to try them out.

Now, here is an excerpt from a blog written by Suzanne that is worth repeating. The biggest concern most people neglect to mention...

ALLERGIES. There are millions of children and adults with severe allergies to dogs. It poses a health risk for them to be in an establishment that has pet dander. Should these paying patrons, human beings, be subjected to itching, wheezing, coughing or WORSE just so that a dog can relax under the table? It is completely ludicrous to subject one human being to a dangerous health environment so that an animal can enjoy the outdoor seating. Its shocking that your article completely ignores perhaps the most important crux of this argument � the fact that dogs in dining establishments can cause a health risk for other patrons.

This is not just about the fact that dogs carry fleas, walk barefoot on the pavement, step in their own urine and excrement and then walk into a cafe or restaurant where FOOD is being served. This is not just about the fact that waiters who may pet the dog, or brush past and contaminate their apron with pet dander may get harmful bacteria in another diner�s FOOD. This is not just the fact that dogs may be rambunctious, jump on the table, or try to grab some of the food and destroy the dining experience of paying customers. Nor is it just about the fact that pet owners may pet their dog and then take their hands and touch glasses, cutlery, plates and napkins, contaminating the washing water for restaurant equipment that is used to serve FOOD. This is not just about the fact that, according to the written law, the FDA has banned live animals from establishments where food is served. It is ILLEGAL, however you may try to brush it off or explain it away, those regulations are there to protect people. Not just from salmonella and e-coli, but from the harmful pathogens that dogs naturally carry. It is not only for these reasons that dogs should be banned from establishments where food is served. It is also for the fact that the simple act of bringing your dog into a restaurant or dining patio can cause tremendous and severe health risks for those who are allergic to dogs. One paying patron�s infatuation with their animal should never supersede the health and safety of another PAYING PATRON, especially when food is involved.

I am mystified that the Florida Health Dept. would allow an animal to eat on a patio along with humans....... The paper indicated there will be a doggie menu for the pets to enjoy.....
WOW... What animal is next!!!!!

[perrjojo]

Originally Posted by TraceyMooreRN

Went there Thursday night- 445ish--was great. Service and food. Although, my friends and husbands burger not exactly to order---tasted great. We will all go back. Specialty drinks on sale 4-6pm I think? Had several drinks, appetizer and burgers--50.00 bucks--I thought it was worth what we drank/ate.

It seems everyone is enjoying the new resturaunt.

[yabbadu]

Originally Posted by perrjojo

There are some that just can't stand the thought of dogs being in public. I don't get it and I hope those people never live in Europe because dogs lay under the tables while you dine in most resturaunts. I guess I was feeling a little mischievous this morning and would see how many chains I could jerk.

We are NOT in Europe! Check you map...It's Florida!

[Shimpy]

Funny how The Villages is promoting their health care system and adding hamburger joints at the same time.

[Shirleevee]

Originally Posted by Shimpy

Funny how The Villages is promoting their health care system and adding hamburger joints at the same time.

Loved Square !:

FYI....Sailor had the Salmon Burger and I had the Lump Crab (real) without the bun......delish!!!!!!!!!

[buggyone]

Dogs are allowed in outdoor areas of restaurants as long as the restaurant follows the guide set forth in the law.

509.233 Public food service establishment requirements; local exemption for dogs in designated outdoor portions.

You may Google it for yourself. I am sure Square One Burger knows the law and will uphold themselves to those standards.

Of course, if you as a patron do not want to go to that restaurant - Just Do Not Go. Personally, I think it sounds like a great place and I am planning on eating there.

[redwitch]

I'll happily agree to a ban on dogs at all public places if there will be a ban against any and all scents in those same areas. I'm extremely sensitive to scents and that includes shampoos and bodywashes, not just perfumes and aftershaves. If I am at a restaurant and seated next to someone wearing a lot of scent or one that I am more sensitive to than others, I ask that I be moved. If I can't be accommodated, I leave. I don't ask the scented individual to leave. I don't get angry at the restaurant for following the law. Dogs are allowed in outdoor patio areas in the State of Florida. Smelly people are allowed in all areas of a restaurant. I'd much rather sit next to the dog than the perfumery.

And another one who plans to check out Square 1 -- probably on my next jaunt to the library.