[pauld315]

I still don't see exactly what he did to get banned. What exactly did he do?

[rubicon]

Originally Posted by Sandtrap328

I think it would be worth the $145 per month to the Villages Recreation Department not to have him around.
Seems as though some people just do not want to be happy.

If he has been barred from all recreational amenities he may well be able to claim a waiver of the $145.00 per month fee. Perhaps that is one of his court claims?
And without knowledge of the petitions made in his lawsuits I cannot judgment comment

I don;t believe that people want to be unhappy but rather they do not know how to be happy. Perhaps if not a medical condition, then perhaps whatever tragedy(s) that came into his life he has not been able to properly process it. He appears to be in a lot of mental pain. He needs professional help and I say that with great empathy for this guy. I pray there is someone in his life looking out for him. Having said that its clear people should not have to carry his burdens or be subjected to his rants, etc

For most of us life is sorrow so we understand that when joy enters our life we grab hold of it quickly and hold it as long as we can

[maureenod]

Hope he doesn't own a gun.

[Madelaine Amee]

Originally Posted by pauld315

I still don't see exactly what he did to get banned. What exactly did he do?

Somewhere I read that Lady Lake are banning him for "litigious behaviour" - whatever than means!

[gomoho]

This unfortunate man appears to have some mental health issues. He needs help - not criticism. And if God forbid he gets his hands on a gun everyone will be scratching their heads and wondering what went wrong.

[ColdNoMore]

Originally Posted by maureenod

Hope he doesn't own a gun.

That same thought crossed my mind.

Originally Posted by Madelaine Amee

Somewhere I read that Lady Lake are banning him for "litigious behaviour" - whatever than means!

The legal term is.... "vexatious litigant."

Vexatious litigant legal definition of vexatious litigant

vexatious litigant: a person who brings actions with no reasonable chance of success with the object of causing annoyance to opponents; such actions maybe struck out, and the court may order, on application of the ATTORNEY GENERAL, that no further legal proceedings may be begun by the vexatious litigant without the leave of the court.

A similar procedure has existed in Scotland at least since the Vexatious Actions (Scotland) Act 1898 whereby the LORD ADVOCATE may apply to the Inner House preventing a party raising an action without the permission of a LORD ORDINARY.

[Bonny]

I have known him for quite some time. He is definitely sue happy and very creepy.

[Taltarzac725]

Originally Posted by Bonny

I have known him for quite some time. He is definitely sue happy.

I hope he is not on TOTV??

[Bonny]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

I hope he is not on TOTV??

I would doubt that very much.

[Taltarzac725]

Originally Posted by Bonny

I would doubt that very much.

I would not want him suing TOTV or me for some reason.

I have met people who just like to sue anyone they disagree with in some manner.

[outlaw]

How can a municipality or the TV recreation center ban someone because they are litigious? One would think that, as a taxpayer/amenities payer, he would have to be compensated for the loss of these amenities. It's not a safety issue. It seems to just be an inconvenience issue. Why not counter sue this guy for legal expenses if his suits are frivolous? What if Lady Lake decides they want to ban him from driving on their roads? Strange.

[Bonny]

If anyone on is on Suzie Casta's facebook, there are some remarks about him on there.

[DeanFL]

OK.

[Marathon Man]

Originally Posted by outlaw

How can a municipality or the TV recreation center ban someone because they are litigious? One would think that, as a taxpayer/amenities payer, he would have to be compensated for the loss of these amenities. It's not a safety issue. It seems to just be an inconvenience issue. Why not counter sue this guy for legal expenses if his suits are frivolous? What if Lady Lake decides they want to ban him from driving on their roads? Strange.

That may not be the reason.

[Taltarzac725]

Originally Posted by Bonny

If anyone on is on Suzie Casta's facebook, there are some remarks about him on there.

Thanks Bonnie.

When I was a Student Director at Legal Assistance to Minnesota Prisoners I had to deal with some of the jailhouse lawyers at Minnesota Correctional Facility--Stillwater. They had a lot of time on their hands and would try to sue anyone they could just to keep busy and often wanted me to do research for them that would have taken me months to do. My Supervisor would just look at me funny when I tried to do some of this research as they just wrote it off a long time before as a waste of time.

It seems like some of these nuisance lawsuit filers just have too much time on their hands.