[davefin]

It's a cycle people. Can't do a thing to prevent it. There have been several Ice Ages, we are still recovering from the last one. The cycle is roughly 60,000 years. Get real people... adjust!

[greg.turay]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

https://www.nationalacademies.org/ba...CAAEgKrQ_D_BwE

What bothers me is the logic of climate change deniers. They say that it is a pattern of centuries or something like that. But what happens to the people living decade to decade or year to year? We humans may all be dead by 2122 at the rate we are changing the earth now.

I know that I will be dead by 2122.

[Taltarzac725]

Originally Posted by greg.turay

I know that I will be dead by 2122.

And so might most of the human race.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

And so might most of the human race.

We very well might. But it will have absolutely nothing to do with climate change.

[lkagele]

Originally Posted by rsmurano

That narrative didn’t pan out along with dozens of others. Years ago, it was earth warming, then earth cooling, the hole in the ozone, then climate change. The only change is the narrative of the year

You forgot acid rain.

Earth is 4.5 billion years old.
Mankind has been around for 200,000 years.
Industrial revolution started less than 200 years ago.

Anyone believing mankind has destroyed the planet in less than 200 years is simply catering to the fear mongering.

[Junehher]

FINALLY, someone with sense. Thanks for the research and information.

[lkagele]

Originally Posted by MartinSE

Can you provide a list of 1 or 2 people GETTING RICH?

Easy. John Kerry and Al Gore. BTW, how many of Gore's predictions from the Inconvenient Truth have come true? Been awhile since I watched it but I remember that San Fran and Florida were supposed to disappear from rising sea levels.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

Excellent????? I think you spelled "ridiculous" wrong---it starts with a "r"

Thank you, teacher. 😏

[MartinSE]

Originally Posted by lkagele

You forgot acid rain.

Earth is 4.5 billion years old.
Mankind has been around for 200,000 years.
Industrial revolution started less than 200 years ago.

Anyone believing mankind has destroyed the planet in less than 200 years is simply catering to the fear mongering.

Let see, could you show where someone said we DESTROYED the planet. I will wait.

[Carlsondm]

Originally Posted by BlueStarAirlines

I don't think there are very many climate chain deniers. What most note is that most climate chain proponents deny normal climate cycles. If one ignores the normal heating and cooling of the earth and focuses on a narrow amount of time instead of the whole the only conclusion is man is creating/influencing the change.

As with everything in this world, one needs to follow the money. People are becoming very rich peddling climate change....look at who the leaders of the movement are and where their investments are. Very illuminating.....

Most climate concerned scientists try to look at the WHOLE picture and consider as many variables as they can afford. They recognize that there are uncontrollable (by man) and controllable contributions to carefully observed and statistically reported temperature increases. Long term averages have shown a slow creep upward in temperatures around the globe.
If you have a victim mentality, you want to let the earth continue on so you can do the woe is me thing and start blaming.
If you have a survivalist approach, you look at the biggest controllable contributions to climate change and reduce them as feasible.
God helps those who help themselves.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580

Thank you, teacher. 😏

You're welcome. Anytime.

"Science" had us believing in masks and jabs. Wonder how many masks are polluting parking lots and dumps now all while politicians fly in their eco-friendly jets?

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

So, did I understand that post? Does it claim that the temperature (weather) for ONE DAY in ONE LOCATION can be extrapolated to conclude that mankind is causing a change in a 100,000 year cycle and dooming us to live in a Venusian climate? Please tell me it didn't mean that.

So, did I understand that the extremely unusual temperature for one day in one location can, in absolutely no possible way, be an indication or symtom of mankind interference in the normal or natural order of things?

[denniskathyb]

When the ice age came it took 10,000 years for the ice to get 2 miles thick over Iowa.
We are now compressing 10,000 of temp change into several 100. Life needs more than 200 years to adapt.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580

So, did I understand that the extremely unusual temperature for one day in one location can, in absolutely no possible way, be an indication or symtom of mankind interference in the normal or natural order of things?

That would be correct. Great! Now you understand! One down, about 8 million to go.