[ficoguy]

Costco and "THE DEVELOPER" had a feud some time ago and there will be no COSTCO on Village Property. We almost didn't get the neighborhood WalMart off 466A because THE DEVELOPER works off a % of sales rental model, and WMT does not do % of sales. Cooler head prevailed.

[Stu from NYC]

Originally Posted by ficoguy

Costco and "THE DEVELOPER" had a feud some time ago and there will be no COSTCO on Village Property. We almost didn't get the neighborhood WalMart off 466A because THE DEVELOPER works off a % of sales rental model, and WMT does not do % of sales. Cooler head prevailed.

I would imagine Costco would want low cost rent but would think there is a lot of vacant land that would be ideal for them if they wanted to come here.

[Stu from NYC]

Originally Posted by Dana1963

I must agree with you on that just returned from trip through Midwest, New England and Atlantic Coast yes there is a big difference in prices on just about everything. Although there are exceptions.

Figured that some day when we can travel back to where we came from a lot of food would be in the car on the way home.

That would include stuff we have not found here.

[coffeebean]

~~~

[coffeebean]

Originally Posted by zonerboy

I think the Trailwinds location gives Publix some leverage. If rent from Trailwinds is less than locations on Village developer land, they could always close the Colony location and stay with the new location.

Bite your tongue!!!!!!!

[Aloha1]

Originally Posted by JSR22

Sam's is a smaller footprint.

But same big lot concept.

[CFrance]

Originally Posted by ficoguy

Costco and "THE DEVELOPER" had a feud some time ago and there will be no COSTCO on Village Property. We almost didn't get the neighborhood WalMart off 466A because THE DEVELOPER works off a % of sales rental model, and WMT does not do % of sales. Cooler head prevailed.

Whose heads prevailed, the developer's or WalMart's?