Why is the US so behind in testing?

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #46  
Old 04-23-2020, 09:44 AM
cemlopez cemlopez is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 10
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skarra View Post
I don't get why the richest country in the world is at #42 on the tests/1M population chart (Coronavirus Update (Live): 2,628,469 Cases and 183,491 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer). It is still very difficult to get a test weeks after we were promised they were available to everyone.

If we don't know where we stand re infections (the hidden threat), how can we make a sane decision that it's safe to go back to business as usual?

Hope is not a strategy. I've no confidence in what they're telling me - it is NOT safe to go back to "normal" until we get more testing done.
What? We have tested more people than the rest of the World combine.
Maybe a good question is why the previous federal and local administrations were so ill prepare to handle a situation like the one we find ourselves in.
  #47  
Old 04-23-2020, 09:45 AM
dplars dplars is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Santo Domingo
Posts: 142
Thanks: 20
Thanked 19 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Also, its the States responsibility, some are on the ball some are not, in addition compare the geographical size of what you are comparing. to. I'm vulnerable, no symptoms no need to test
  #48  
Old 04-23-2020, 09:47 AM
ficoguy ficoguy is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: PINE RIDGE
Posts: 360
Thanks: 43
Thanked 379 Times in 169 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatbrat View Post
Testing is only a snap shot in time--you could be negative one day & positive 24 hours latter--the only thing that matters is a cure or better yet a vaccine--
Assuming the test is accurate - which it is only 88% of the time
  #49  
Old 04-23-2020, 09:52 AM
JimJohnson JimJohnson is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: The Villages
Posts: 723
Thanks: 259
Thanked 1,015 Times in 273 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skarra View Post
I don't get why the richest country in the world is at #42 on the tests/1M population chart (Coronavirus Update (Live): 2,628,469 Cases and 183,491 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer). It is still very difficult to get a test weeks after we were promised they were available to everyone.

If we don't know where we stand re infections (the hidden threat), how can we make a sane decision that it's safe to go back to business as usual?

Hope is not a strategy. I've no confidence in what they're telling me - it is NOT safe to go back to "normal" until we get more testing done.
This pandemic was set in motion 3 years ago.
  #50  
Old 04-23-2020, 10:32 AM
nancymiller217@yahoo.com nancymiller217@yahoo.com is offline
Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 71
Thanks: 166
Thanked 111 Times in 42 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspinmo View Post
Let’s see, new virus and 350 million plus people. they are testing the hot spots, our area not considered hot spot
Not to mention the Chinese delayed getting us a virus sample, they had to create the tests from scratch because it’s a new virus, had to get equipment to run the tests

AND we have everything in the country shut down at a time when we suddenly need to manufacture 350 million plus swabs, test tubes, reagents, and test machines. Even now they are saying they will only be able to manufacture 20 million or so swabs a month.

So absent, a magic wand to magically create tests, I don’t know where people thought they were going to come from.
  #51  
Old 04-23-2020, 10:41 AM
blueash's Avatar
blueash blueash is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,385
Thanks: 253
Thanked 3,476 Times in 936 Posts
Default

Quote:
If we needed 100 million test kits for The Clap, do we have them? Nooooooo....
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ficoguy View Post
Do we have 100 million test kits if people somehow decided we all needed a test for venereal disease? I highly doubt we have 100 million of any kinds of tests - these kits deteriorate if not used over time. I'm not talking about cotton swabs - I'm talking about the chemicals and reagents that are used to process the swab. Its ridiculous to assume we can get tested anytime, anywhere for anything. There is a ramp up period. Oh, and someone has to pay for these too...
Do you want to prove that we don't have enough COVID kits because we don't have enough STD tests, proving we don't have enough to test for anything to the mystical 100 million.

Sorry, you're wrong. This country would have no problem doing 100 million tests for gonorrhea. All you need in a pinch is a microscope and a stain. I'm not sure why you picked an STD as your benchmark as there are thousands less available tests.
  #52  
Old 04-23-2020, 11:12 AM
JimJohnson JimJohnson is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: The Villages
Posts: 723
Thanks: 259
Thanked 1,015 Times in 273 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cemlopez View Post
What? We have tested more people than the rest of the World combine.
Maybe a good question is why the previous federal and local administrations were so ill prepare to handle a situation like the one we find ourselves in.
Great programs were put in place but cancelled under the current administration.
  #53  
Old 04-23-2020, 11:32 AM
mvbird mvbird is offline
Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Brooklyn O; NYC; Cambridge, Ma; London, UK; Martha's Vineyard Is.; Newburyport, Ma; The Villages
Posts: 58
Thanks: 51
Thanked 31 Times in 15 Posts
Default

Exactly what I was going to say. People should only be tested if they have symptoms, and then it is to be treated or quarantined. It is a waste of time and money to test everyone. You could have a positive test today, feel happy, go shopping and pick up the virus. The test just measures you at that point in time.
  #54  
Old 04-23-2020, 11:36 AM
ficoguy ficoguy is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: PINE RIDGE
Posts: 360
Thanks: 43
Thanked 379 Times in 169 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Fletcher View Post
The original post states America is richest country in the world. If ever a statement was wrong.

Perhaps the problem is summed up with that statement.

If Americans believe that, then I guess they believe anything.
We are not the richest per capita. That's how wealth is measured
  #55  
Old 04-23-2020, 11:44 AM
kathy1516 kathy1516 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 131
Thanks: 102
Thanked 107 Times in 57 Posts
Default

False security. Unless you’ve never stopped at a grocery store, picked up a prescription, came in contact with no other human beings or touched anything other than in your own house after disinfecting everything each time you leave your garage than no, you are still apt to be able to contract the virus! False security!
  #56  
Old 04-23-2020, 12:04 PM
BevSparks BevSparks is offline
Member
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 33
Thanks: 41
Thanked 31 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skarra View Post
I don't get why the richest country in the world is at #42 on the tests/1M population chart (Coronavirus Update (Live): 2,628,469 Cases and 183,491 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer). It is still very difficult to get a test weeks after we were promised they were available to everyone.

If we don't know where we stand re infections (the hidden threat), how can we make a sane decision that it's safe to go back to business as usual?


Hope is not a strategy. I've no confidence in what they're telling me - it is NOT safe to go back to "normal" until we get more testing done.
If you've remained in quarantine for at 2/3 weeks, then you don't need to be tested for the virus. Later we will have antibody tests available to determine who has had the virus and who needs to self-protect later in the year if the virus returns.
If you fall into the group with one or more health issues that can cause life threatening side effects from the virus, then you should stay home until the second phase of "reopening" begins. I fall into that group so I will be wearing a mask and practice distance for a while longer, even though I think I had the virus from taking a cruise in early Dec.
It's all bolis down to common sense... imo We all need to practice safety health measures going forward, like wearing a mask when sick with colds, etc so we don't spread germs...
  #57  
Old 04-23-2020, 12:08 PM
BevSparks BevSparks is offline
Member
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 33
Thanks: 41
Thanked 31 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ficoguy View Post
Assuming the test is accurate - which it is only 88% of the time
Step daughter had test taken 2 days ago in MA and was told 1 of 3 are false negatives.. She is very sick and probably has covid, said she can retest and she said, no thank you...
  #58  
Old 04-23-2020, 01:40 PM
TesaA TesaA is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 18
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Thank You … we need the perspective!
  #59  
Old 04-23-2020, 01:45 PM
ficoguy ficoguy is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: PINE RIDGE
Posts: 360
Thanks: 43
Thanked 379 Times in 169 Posts
Default

Its a damned big country
  #60  
Old 04-23-2020, 03:08 PM
Lindsyburnsy Lindsyburnsy is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 416
Thanks: 1,500
Thanked 643 Times in 232 Posts
Default

All you have to do is turn on all except one cable and/or other news outlet you would have been informed that people most governors are begging for the test kits, or supplies that make up the test kits. For instance, the cotton swabs are scarce. Also, the testing machines are now found to be inaccurate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by karostay View Post
Your source is ?
Closed Thread

Tags
back, safe, testing, decision, make


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.