If this is not true, this man, admittedly a conservative, but well known author and member of Stanford University Hoover Institute.....should be arrested, sued and made to issue a public apology.

If this is true, we, all Americans should worry.....

"A key part of President Obama’s legacy will be the fed’s unprecedented collection of sensitive data on Americans by race. The government is prying into our most personal information at the most local levels, all for the purpose of “racial and economic justice.”
Unbeknown to most Americans, Obama’s racial bean counters are furiously mining data on their health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods, even how their kids are disciplined in school — all to document “inequalities” between minorities and whites.

This Orwellian-style stockpile of statistics includes a vast and permanent network of discrimination databases, which Obama already is using to make “disparate impact” cases against: banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks; cities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds.

Big Brother Barack wants the databases operational before he leaves office, and much of the data in them will be posted online.
So civil-rights attorneys and urban Big Brother Barack wants the databases operational before he leaves office, and much of the data in them will be posted online."




Obama collecting personal data for a secret race database | New York Post

This just broke an hour or two ago, and will see how it goes.

I always believed this was going to happen when one was elected as president. It started out with the targetting by the IRS and now moved into Big Brother. It will only get worsen if Hillary gets elected and goes into the femiNazi mode for the liberals.

I am still in shock from reading this and am also shocked that nobody seems to care.

This is how that article ends....

"Even if no one has complained about discrimination, even if there is no other evidence of racism, the numbers themselves will “prove” that things are unfair.
Such databases have never before existed. Obama is presiding over the largest consolidation of personal data in US history. He is creating a diversity police state where government race cops and civil-rights lawyers will micromanage demographic outcomes in virtually every aspect of society.
The first black president, quite brilliantly, has built a quasi-reparations infrastructure perpetually fed by racial data that will outlast his administration."

NY Post. Great source. And intellectual.

uploadfromtaptalk1437274708544.jpg

Originally Posted by Guest

NY Post. Great source. And intellectual.

Attachment 53329

Are you saying that the programs and activities cited by name and program and director was all made up. OR maybe you didn't read the article ???

This guy should be in jail if that is the case !! You can never trust those Stanford grads; they will just make things up

If no one kept records of what happened stratified by race until "Big Brother Barack" ( a term which I'll have to guess is not at all reflective of the opinion of the writer), then how did we ever get Brown vs Board of Education. How were the census data collected in 1860 showing the race of each person? How do you know whether your city was hiring black cops? How did we have the term affirmative action before this administration?
How did proof of discriminatory policing by the NJ police come to light if no one was recording the race of the people? John Lamberth, Driving While Black; A Statistician Proves That Prejudice Still Rules the Road

This is nothing new. Nor is the concept of disparate impact which has been accepted by the Supreme Court. So bloviate away. If the data shows that the only difference in decision making is race then what will be staring you in the face is evidence of racial discrimination. But of course some believe that such racism no longer exists because we have "Big Brother Barack" in the White House.

Originally Posted by Guest

If no one kept records of what happened stratified by race until "Big Brother Barack" ( a term which I'll have to guess is not at all reflective of the opinion of the writer), then how did we ever get Brown vs Board of Education. How were the census data collected in 1860 showing the race of each person? How do you know whether your city was hiring black cops? How did we have the term affirmative action before this administration?
How did proof of discriminatory policing by the NJ police come to light if no one was recording the race of the people? John Lamberth, Driving While Black; A Statistician Proves That Prejudice Still Rules the Road

This is nothing new. Nor is the concept of disparate impact which has been accepted by the Supreme Court. So bloviate away. If the data shows that the only difference in decision making is race then what will be staring you in the face is evidence of racial discrimination. But of course some believe that such racism no longer exists because we have "Big Brother Barack" in the White House.

Has there EVER been a criticism of this President that was legitimate ?

Are we living in the age of absolute perfection in our leadership ?

Even when he outright lies, it is defended in a manner to insure that those who criticize are racists, bigots, or just poor dumb (whatever the mocking nickname of the day might be); we, who think he tells stories, etc are just dumb fools and we must wake up and learn.

We are honored to have such an honest, humble, non political, problem solver, foreign policy expert, non confrontational man serving as our leader.

Originally Posted by Guest

Has there EVER been a criticism of this President that was legitimate ?

Are we living in the age of absolute perfection in our leadership ?

Even when he outright lies, it is defended in a manner to insure that those who criticize are racists, bigots, or just poor dumb (whatever the mocking nickname of the day might be); we, who think he tells stories, etc are just dumb fools and we must wake up and learn.

We are honored to have such an honest, humble, non political, problem solver, foreign policy expert, non confrontational man serving as our leader.

Originally Posted by Guest

If no one kept records of what happened stratified by race until "Big Brother Barack" ( a term which I'll have to guess is not at all reflective of the opinion of the writer), then how did we ever get Brown vs Board of Education. How were the census data collected in 1860 showing the race of each person? How do you know whether your city was hiring black cops? How did we have the term affirmative action before this administration?
How did proof of discriminatory policing by the NJ police come to light if no one was recording the race of the people? John Lamberth, Driving While Black; A Statistician Proves That Prejudice Still Rules the Road

This is nothing new. Nor is the concept of disparate impact which has been accepted by the Supreme Court. So bloviate away. If the data shows that the only difference in decision making is race then what will be staring you in the face is evidence of racial discrimination. But of course some believe that such racism no longer exists because we have "Big Brother Barack" in the White House.

Important to note, EACH AND EVERY DEPARTMENT CITED TO COLLECT RACIAL DATA ONLY,



JUST SET UP.

IT IS NEW...VERY NEW. It is against the law for me, as someone in business, or in any part of life to collect data BASED SOLEY ON RACE.

Originally Posted by Guest

If no one kept records of what happened stratified by race until "Big Brother Barack" ( a term which I'll have to guess is not at all reflective of the opinion of the writer), then how did we ever get Brown vs Board of Education. How were the census data collected in 1860 showing the race of each person? How do you know whether your city was hiring black cops? How did we have the term affirmative action before this administration?
How did proof of discriminatory policing by the NJ police come to light if no one was recording the race of the people? John Lamberth, Driving While Black; A Statistician Proves That Prejudice Still Rules the Road

This is nothing new. Nor is the concept of disparate impact which has been accepted by the Supreme Court. So bloviate away. If the data shows that the only difference in decision making is race then what will be staring you in the face is evidence of racial discrimination. But of course some believe that such racism no longer exists because we have "Big Brother Barack" in the White House.

Your link is SEVENTEEN..17.....years old !!!

Originally Posted by Guest

If no one kept records of what happened stratified by race until "Big Brother Barack" ( a term which I'll have to guess is not at all reflective of the opinion of the writer), then how did we ever get Brown vs Board of Education. How were the census data collected in 1860 showing the race of each person? How do you know whether your city was hiring black cops? How did we have the term affirmative action before this administration?
How did proof of discriminatory policing by the NJ police come to light if no one was recording the race of the people? John Lamberth, Driving While Black; A Statistician Proves That Prejudice Still Rules the Road

This is nothing new. Nor is the concept of disparate impact which has been accepted by the Supreme Court. So bloviate away. If the data shows that the only difference in decision making is race then what will be staring you in the face is evidence of racial discrimination. But of course some believe that such racism no longer exists because we have "Big Brother Barack" in the White House.

Disparate impact has been around since the 1960's. It states that if there isn't a racially balanced in every aspect of American life then it must be discrimination. This concept was challenged in a legal case in Minneapolis -Saint Paul and Obama's Justice Department recognized that it was going to be discredited so he dispatched his people to go to MN and get this case removed he did so by trading off another case. There is no legal reasoning behind this concept but then there is no legal reasoning behind same-sex marriage or Obamacare federal exchanges but an activist judicial court allow their liberal basis to supplement legal reasoning and they are not done yet .

The story line the OP references was also reported in the Wall Street Journal

When a president on the day four marines are killed by an Islamic terrorist pays tribute and honor the Muslim community we have a president who is cold and to add insult to injury he jets off after that to another fund raiser.

A father and mother of a young woman murdered by an illegal never get an acknowledgement of the Administration while a deserter and traitor parents are given a well publicized invitation to the rose garden. Four marines are murdered and on that same day Obama is embracing Muslim and off to a fund raiser. Christians are killed mocked discriminated against both globally and nationally and Obama embraces Muslim again and again and again for the last 6.5 years. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Your link is SEVENTEEN..17.....years old !!!

And thank you for seeing that. As it is exactly my point. The OP is suggesting via his link, that the collection of data based on race is somehow a new thing, and created by Obama (hint, think Black person). A 17 year old story of an investigation into the negative impact of black skin on liberty or freedom should put to rest the idea that this is all Obama's fault. For a quick read I would suggest "Black like me" written over 50 years ago. It is artificial in that the author always knew he could quit being black and had not grown up with all the disadvantages of being black. He just got a tiny piece of institutional racism and wrote about it.

If a black child is suspended for swearing in class and a white student is not, all other things being the same, is that a problem? Well not for the white kid. And if we don't collect data to see if that is the case how will be ever know? All we have now is black parents making a claim that such things are routine. If Vinnie Barbarino drops a few f bombs into his comments do we cut him more slack, given his background and the language he hears in his home and neighborhood, than if Queen Elizabeth did the same? Does one person better understand cultural expectations in the school than the other?

Originally Posted by Guest

You can never trust those Stanford grads; they will just make things up

Tiger Woods dropped out of Stanford before graduating. He will be sorry for not having a college degree!

Originally Posted by Guest

And thank you for seeing that. As it is exactly my point. The OP is suggesting via his link, that the collection of data based on race is somehow a new thing, and created by Obama (hint, think Black person). A 17 year old story of an investigation into the negative impact of black skin on liberty or freedom should put to rest the idea that this is all Obama's fault. For a quick read I would suggest "Black like me" written over 50 years ago. It is artificial in that the author always knew he could quit being black and had not grown up with all the disadvantages of being black. He just got a tiny piece of institutional racism and wrote about it.

If a black child is suspended for swearing in class and a white student is not, all other things being the same, is that a problem? Well not for the white kid. And if we don't collect data to see if that is the case how will be ever know? All we have now is black parents making a claim that such things are routine. If Vinnie Barbarino drops a few f bombs into his comments do we cut him more slack, given his background and the language he hears in his home and neighborhood, than if Queen Elizabeth did the same? Does one person better understand cultural expectations in the school than the other?

EVERY SINGLE PROGRAM CITED IS NEW

EVERY SINGLE DEPARTMENT IS NEW

EVERY SINGLE PERSON MANAGING THOSE PROGRAMS IS NEW

I happen to be one who read BLACK LIKE ME.....maybe twice as I recall. If anyone wants perfection; i.e.. white absolutely ignoring the color of a black person OR a black absolutely ignoring the color of a white person.........IT IS NEVER EVER GONG TO HAPPEN.

To even suggest that discipline in schools where blacks receive more discipline than whites is based TOTALLY on the color of their skin, and to ignore the clear and distinct family problems facing black children is IN ITSELF A RACIST way to look at things.

BLACK LIVE MATTER is a great slogan. Instead of aiming exclusively at police and schools who absolutely try to help, aim it where it should be aimed, and NO PROGRAMS nor any admonitions toward that end exist to my knowledge.