Originally Posted by RichieLion

B.S., and you know it. Your insulting comments on my supposed sources of news is not appreciated, but I don't expect anything of real value in this forum from you anyway.

Richie, Richie Richie. You know that only you hold the title as the best insulter on this site so don't give up the title so quick. You need not share it with anyone else.

Originally Posted by Bucco

A dumb comment.

From me, I have just gotten sick of the double standard...example.....I criticize President Obama and I am called a racist or a radical. Those who what to criticize President Bush find it funny to call him by various names instead of offering what they expect from anyone else on this President. Then the same people call for being civil....just plain dumb

I might add, that from my perspective, I also dont understand people who need to call folks they dont agree with by little cute names.....it is degrading to them and the poster in my opinion. These are the same people who DEMAND respect from others.

Boy oh boy, can I understand that! I wasn't on the forum 48 hours and it was happening to me, not just degradation but out right lies too! Anyway, if nothing else, I can at least get a good laugh at them and counter the aggrivation they're trying to impose!

Originally Posted by The Villager II

Richie, Richie Richie. You know that only you hold the title as the best insulter on this site so don't give up the title so quick. You need not share it with anyone else.

Belated Congratulation Richie! But perhaps you should really give the trophy back!

Originally Posted by skyguy79

Belated Congratulation Richie! But perhaps you should really give the trophy back!

Thanks Sky, I appreciate the recognition. A big difference is I ,by and large, address the liberals as a group, and one or another of them take umbrage and attack me personally. I then might respond directly to that person and am then called "hateful", or some other name. There's a big difference there.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Thanks Sky, I appreciate the recognition. A big difference is I ,by and large, address the liberals as a group, and one or another of them take umbrage and attack me personally. I then might respond directly to that person and am then called "hateful", or some other name. There's a big difference there.

I fully understand where you're coming from. The DNC must put out a manual to their base on how to do what liberals are doing and how to post even extremely loony, no sense nonsense posts. You see some of the unbelievable comments that are emerging on the new Voter Fraud thread? Unbelievable! Absolutely unbelievable!!!

Anyway, I've witnessed this kind of behavior for a long time in the media and I've personally experienced it extensively on Facebook where I'm a whole lot more political that I am here... a whole lot more! On Facebook however, there are people that would made the antics on here look like amateur hour, probably because there are rules that hold them back. They do try to stretch the line of the rules, but it does at least hold them back somewhat.

On Facebook and through personal emails, I've dumped a total of 3 friends so far, friends that I actually know personally and just because they had to resort to being nasty and insulting. Couldn't care less though because a friend that get as nasty and insult, like they did, have no character and are no friend anyway!

So enjoy your trophy and don't let them take that away from you like their the mostly liberal government officials take and wastes your tax dollars!

Originally Posted by coralway

It took a Dem. to put a dent in our foe.

Actualy it took the United States Special Operations Group to put a "dent in our for." Facts are facts, didn't matter who was in office at the time, its the military that does the work.

Originally Posted by Posh 08

I was raised to say President this or Senator that. Not the disrespectful and easy last name stuff. The JFK or LBJ was good. But then again I was raised below the Mason Dixon Line.

Can you tell me what states are separated by the Mason Dixon Line?

I know but do you.

Originally Posted by Figmo Bohica

Can you tell me what states are separated by the Mason Dixon Line?

I know but do you.

Yes....Mason and Dixon

Originally Posted by rubicon

Yes....Mason and Dixon

Now can you tell me who was buried in Grant's tomb?

Originally Posted by rubicon

Yes....Mason and Dixon

You must be referring to the other 7 states that our leader thinks are states, is this the name of two of them. I see that you also don't know what states are separated by the Mason Dixon Line. Google it, learn something new today.

Originally Posted by rubicon

Yes....Mason and Dixon

Hey...I resemble that comment . . .

Originally Posted by rubicon

Now can you tell me who was buried in Grant's tomb?

No one, Grant is not buried. He is above ground.

Originally Posted by RichieLion

Bucco, your observations are right on target. I am also attacking the liberal media for their non-coverage of this story and their reporting of trash.

I applaud your comments.

Oh my goodness! This kinda sounds like The Villages Daily Sun is liberal media?????

Originally Posted by skyguy79

There are many justifyable reasons why Obama must go this November, toping the list with Obamacare, catastrophic stimulus spending and legislation that had to be passed to find out what was in it. But this issue violating Catholic's freedom of religion rights is in itself justification to send him into a happy retirement where we'll be contributing to his entitlement benefits for many years to come!

,

skyguy: Unfortunately far too many people do not understand what Obama is trying to create here. We are fortunate that the Supreme Court 9-0 pushed back on Obama and his Administration concerning the Hosanna v EEOC case because if they ruled in Obama's favor then it would have removed the buffer between individuals and the state. The Catholic issue you raised is another attempt;albeit for different reasons. If this law is allowed to stand then what is next Catholic agency can't operate adoption agencies unless they allow gay couples to adopt. The Boy Scouts viewed as a religious organization won't be allowed to assemble, etc.......................

Clearly Obama and his Admin believe and speak of the "freedom to worship" whereas the majority of us see it broader as the "freedom of religion' Why the difference ....Obama said it best during his 2008 campaign when he talked about those "small town Americansas bitter people clinging to guns and religion".

Meanwhile Joe Biden, a Catholic has bowed his head in shame at Obama's antics.

The american people chose wrong in 2008

Well, it seems as though the Republicans are talking religion and morality once again. Bring up David Vitter, Newt Gingrich, and Mark Folley and see their reactions.