Anybody who wants to have this country get back on track will need to be sure to not vote for any career politicians. They know politics only....which means their top priority is their career, second is their party, then special inteand minority groups.

To fix broken entities means making changes or eliminating that which does not add value or make the improvements needed. Politicians will never ever be capable of doing that. The will not rock the political boat/system. The will not eliminate something that is not working for fear of upsetting another politician's turf.

So for sure Clinton is not qualified to get anything done other than accomplish her own personal objectives. Being dishonest and untrustworthy are not attributes one wants in a POTUS......we have seen enough of that the past 7 years.

In addition she is phony. in KY this week it was noted how her southern accent was back in full use while there. Does she think people are stupid?
Do those who advise her have no more brains than to keep phonying up her visits?

Originally Posted by Guest

Anybody who wants to have this country get back on track will need to be sure to not vote for any career politicians. They know politics only....which means their top priority is their career, second is their party, then special inteand minority groups.

To fix broken entities means making changes or eliminating that which does not add value or make the improvements needed. Politicians will never ever be capable of doing that. The will not rock the political boat/system. The will not eliminate something that is not working for fear of upsetting another politician's turf.

So for sure Clinton is not qualified to get anything done other than accomplish her own personal objectives. Being dishonest and untrustworthy are not attributes one wants in a POTUS......we have seen enough of that the past 7 years.

In addition she is phony. in KY this week it was noted how her southern accent was back in full use while there. Does she think people are stupid?
Do those who advise her have no more brains than to keep phonying up her visits?

There is only one answer to all these problems and his name is DONALD TRUMP!!!!!

Amazing that all the Village Republicans (low information voters) are chiming in on why they think that Mrs. Clinton is dishonest, etc.

You Republicans are running scared that she is going to win the presidential election.

We Democrats are not scared of any Republican winning because they have all said stupid things about women, minority groups, or climate change.

People that think (not Republicans, because they do not know how to think for themselves) vote Democrat.

Run scared, Republicans and Tea Party, you are headed for another loss!

Originally Posted by Guest

Amazing that all the Village Republicans (low information voters) are chiming in on why they think that Mrs. Clinton is dishonest, etc.

You Republicans are running scared that she is going to win the presidential election.

We Democrats are not scared of any Republican winning because they have all said stupid things about women, minority groups, or climate change.

People that think (not Republicans, because they do not know how to think for themselves) vote Democrat.

Run scared, Republicans and Tea Party, you are headed for another loss!

Same old talking points. You sound like a broken record.

Originally Posted by Guest

Amazing that all the Village Republicans (low information voters) are chiming in on why they think that Mrs. Clinton is dishonest, etc.

You Republicans are running scared that she is going to win the presidential election.

We Democrats are not scared of any Republican winning because they have all said stupid things about women, minority groups, or climate change.

People that think (not Republicans, because they do not know how to think for themselves) vote Democrat.

Run scared, Republicans and Tea Party, you are headed for another loss!

You know I assume that you folks touting the DEMOCRATIC party on here are embarrassing yourself.

The "Village Republicans (low information voters) " are smart enough despite your insulting remark, to be aware it is mucho too early to begin campaigning as we don't even know who the candidates are.

I might add on your insult to a lot of Villagers, that just reading this forum it would indicate that the intelligent quotient and especially the grasp of actual issues, of those who lean to the right FAR outweighs the posters who simply make up cute names and cite polls.

Also, you say that posters "think" Ms Clinton is dishonest. I think, even checking your own party you will find doubters of her character. Defending her character simply points out again how ill informed you are.

You all simply enjoy the kid games and allow us adults to have intelligent conversations.

Originally Posted by Guest

Amazing that all the Village Republicans (low information voters) are chiming in on why they think that Mrs. Clinton is dishonest, etc.

You Republicans are running scared that she is going to win the presidential election.

We Democrats are not scared of any Republican winning because they have all said stupid things about women, minority groups, or climate change.

People that think (not Republicans, because they do not know how to think for themselves) vote Democrat.

Run scared, Republicans and Tea Party, you are headed for another loss!

I think having a post that insults most Villagers reflects the grasp of reality this poster does not have.

Lets add to her resume....the country, Libya, that Hillary Clinton oversaw the complete destruction of, is back in the news.

Seems people are fleeing that country, one of two called success stories (the other being Yemen) because of our action. iF ONLY we could destroy ISIS that easy.

"More than 2,000 migrants have now died this year as they tried to make the perilous crossing, the International Organization for Migration said in a statement Tuesday.

"As in 2014, the overwhelming majority died in the Channel of Sicily on the Central Mediterranean route connecting Libya and Italy, where unseaworthy vessels used by smugglers and traffickers significantly increase the likelihood of tragedies occurring," the organization said."


Rescuers try to save migrants in Mediterranean shipwreck - CNN.com

How the Democratic party can allow this woman to be their representative in a presidential campaign simply speaks to the basic tenants and beliefs that now exist on the left. That is.....win elections, which they can do....but win elections at any cost.

Originally Posted by Guest

Amazing that all the Village Republicans (low information voters) are chiming in on why they think that Mrs. Clinton is dishonest, etc.

You Republicans are running scared that she is going to win the presidential election.

We Democrats are not scared of any Republican winning because they have all said stupid things about women, minority groups, or climate change.

People that think (not Republicans, because they do not know how to think for themselves) vote Democrat.

Run scared, Republicans and Tea Party, you are headed for another loss!

Yep, we know that liberals will BLINDLY vote for any thief or liar as long as they offer handouts. Ethics mean nothing to liberals. They don't even know the definition. And "morals?" Forgetaboutit.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yep, we know that liberals will BLINDLY vote for any thief or liar as long as they offer handouts. Ethics mean nothing to liberals. They don't even know the definition. And "morals?" Forgetaboutit.

Justice for all, as long as it gets me votes.

Do the right thing, as long as there are votes to be gotten.

Just keep good attorneys on hand to help parse your words and insure that they cannot put you in the pokey.

Originally Posted by Guest

You know I assume that you folks touting the DEMOCRATIC party on here are embarrassing yourself.

The "Village Republicans (low information voters) " are smart enough despite your insulting remark, to be aware it is mucho too early to begin campaigning as we don't even know who the candidates are.

I might add on your insult to a lot of Villagers, that just reading this forum it would indicate that the intelligent quotient and especially the grasp of actual issues, of those who lean to the right FAR outweighs the posters who simply make up cute names and cite polls.

Also, you say that posters "think" Ms Clinton is dishonest. I think, even checking your own party you will find doubters of her character. Defending her character simply points out again how ill informed you are.

You all simply enjoy the kid games and allow us adults to have intelligent conversations.

It is interesting about Ms Clinton.

She wants to be certain things.

Her past makes her certain things.

And it confuses her party.

The link below is a discussion of how she will eventually win the nomination but how it will not come without pain of a sort....this quote from the article is sort of an example of that pull that is going on...

"In July, the American Federation of Teachers became the first union to endorse Mrs. Clinton, with union President Randi Weingarten calling her “a tested leader who shares our values.”

But on the union’s Facebook page, several teachers reacted angrily. One person wrote: “We have a great candidate by the name of BERNIE SANDERS who stands by labor and the movement and you endorse a corporate Democrat!”

Hillary Clinton-Bernie Sanders Race Is a Dilemma for Many Democrats - WSJ

The New York Daily News is historically a LEFT leaning newspapers, and thus this article appearing that surprised me a bit. Almost as much as the attack on Hillary Clinton by the New York Times which we know is a friend of the left.

In any case....

"Without a doubt, the Times’ treatment of the story has been sloppy and the Clinton campaign had good reason to pounce. But the bad news for Team Hillary is that this issue is going to fester. Indeed, over the next months, given the law, precedent and facts already on the record, the imbroglio holds the potential to kill her candidacy.

The law is plain. Under the Espionage Act of 1917, “gross negligence” in the handling of national defense information is a punishable offense. If such information is “removed from its proper place of custody,” the responsible government official faces a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment.

The Obama Justice Department has been making vigorous use of this and related statutes that punish the mishandling of government secrets, prosecuting leakers of classified information in the fiercest crackdown since Richard Nixon’s plumbers. The highest ranking official hit to date is Gen. David Petraeus, whose secrecy violations resulted in a fine and two years of probation.

Now comes the case of Hillary Clinton’s use for official purposes of a private email server housed in her Chappaqua home. Even though the referral to the Justice Department was not criminal in nature, the facts do not look good for Clinton.

According to the inspectors general, four of a sample of 40 emails drawn from the 30,000 emails the former secretary of state turned over to the State Department late last year contained information that was classified at the time it was generated and remains classified today."

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/g...icle-1.2311178

To their point, this is NOT going away anytime soon and this should give everyone pause....

"McClatchey News Service reports that among the emails are secrets generated by five separate U.S. intelligence agencies. A State Department official has cautioned that hundreds of other Clinton emails may also contain classified material. A release of documents on Friday revealed 37 more replete with government secrets.


This is emerging as a major security breach. A private server that could readily be penetrated by hackers or a foreign intelligence agency would certainly not qualify as a “proper place of custody” for government secrets. The national security division of the Justice Department will be compelled to investigate.

How this will play out is impossible to predict. But there is a precedent of surpassing importance."

The article then goes on to detail one of the precedents, which was a member of Bill Clintons team. It went on for years until finally President Clinton gave him a pardon. Not a road that the Clntons want to travel.

And remember what I highlighted in red comes directly from the State Department warning more to come.

Originally Posted by Guest

Amazing that all the Village Republicans (low information voters) are chiming in on why they think that Mrs. Clinton is dishonest, etc.

You Republicans are running scared that she is going to win the presidential election.

We Democrats are not scared of any Republican winning because they have all said stupid things about women, minority groups, or climate change.

People that think (not Republicans, because they do not know how to think for themselves) vote Democrat.

Run scared, Republicans and Tea Party, you are headed for another loss!

Dear Guest: Hmmm

Cattle futures, selling over nights in the Lincoln Bedroom, Rose Law firm documents that suddenly appear in the West wing, were dead broke*, under attack while on inspection during the Iraq-Aghan war oops wasn't even close, Benghazi and what difference does it make , Clinton Charitable Foundation and selling U S uranium mines to Russia, personal server and no classified e-mails ever sent or received

*Reported income of $139 million during those hardship years of 2007-2014.
But they did give $15 million to charity..Great...Wait all but $200,000 went to you guessed it the Clinton Charity Foundation (WSJ 8/5)

Geezzz talk about having no class and a lot of greed

Personal Best Regards:

It becomes very humorous that these posters, well let me say at least one poster, keeps posting about Jeb Bush and the two gaffes he made this week, both of which will be in the wind as time wears on and have little to no importance except to her..the poster.

I find these kind of things all over the country recently and to me, this seems relatively important...

"True to the Clinton playbook, former secretary of State Hillary Clinton is trying to wave away legitimate questions about her appalling behavior as either baseless “partisan” attacks or narrow legalisms normal people don’t care about.

Even if you ignore the very live question of whether or not she’s guilty of criminal transgressions, you’re still left with a woman with abysmal judgment."

The article begins on how almost the entire 8 years that Clinton was in office it was one scandal or another "When her husband was in the Oval Office and embroiled in myriad of scandals, Bill Clinton’s defenders would often say the president isn’t above the law but he isn’t below the law, either. In other words, the president should be judged only by a legal standard. This always struck me as more than a little absurd. Yes, the law matters. Even so, it is but just one relatively short stretch of a much longer border dividing the realms of right and wrong."

Goldberg: Ready for Hillary?

Beautifully ended...

"Wise people learn from their mistakes. And one could argue Clinton has. But she learned the wrong lessons. Instead of changing her behavior, she learned how to better hide the evidence of it. Even former Clinton staffer James Carville surmised she created a private server to hide her emails from congressional oversight.

What hasn’t changed is the Clinton way of obfuscating and parsing, attacking motives and deploying attack dogs. That’s what she does. And if you want more of it, than you are indeed “Ready for Hillary."

I want to know if the Clintons ever returned the china/silverware that they stole from the White House when they departed. THIEVES!!

If Hillary is the best that the Dems have to offer, they need to resurrect Kennedy(if only). Dems would be better off backing Biden. At least, that would be an honorable support. Oh yeah, I forgot that we are talking about Dems. No ethics and no morals. Sorry if I am bitter, but they were the party of my father, and they have really disappointed me for a long time.