Where do they get them all.....I did not see it but as I read it, I was struck by the continuation of the radical folks in this administration but the President is immune for some unknown reason...

"Glenn Beck showed an absolutely damning video of Anita Dunn on his show yesterday. As everyone knows, she is the White House communications director who has declared war on Fox News. The video shows Dunn giving a speech in which she highlights the two most important political philosophers shaping her outlook on politics: Mao Zedong and Mother Teresa. The first “political philosopher” Dunn is praising was a tyrannical dictator who imprisoned, tortured, and killed millions of his own people. In fact, it is estimated that the Chinese Communists — led, inspired, and controlled by Mao — have killed 65 million Chinese citizens since 1949 through the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, and the Gulag system of slave-labor prisons (the “Laogai” system) that Mao implemented."

http://corner.nationalreview.com/pos...YzMzczYjE3N2U=

She is also not simply a peripheral person to the President as I did some research I found this from when she was announced to take this job, albeit temporarily...

"Anita Dunn, a veteran Democratic strategist and top adviser on Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, will take over as White House communications director at least temporarily, according to sources familiar with the move."

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21959.html

The beat goes on with this administration...they do not seem to have a need to be open and honest, and if they say they have no radical leaning, then they dont !!!

It's absolutely frightening. To say this crowd is dangerous to America is an understatement. We are under assault.

may we have your reaction to what is being presented.
The total and complete absence of commentary on these types of subjects is some what perplexing.

Non Obama supporters feel free to offer a view/perspective.

btk

It's the same with the "Safe School" Czar. He appears to be a supporter of NAMBLA as he wrote the forward in a book by the founder I believe it was.

"President Obama's "safe schools czar" is a former schoolteacher who has advocated promoting homosexuality in schools, written about his past drug abuse, expressed his contempt for religion and detailed an incident in which he did not report an underage student who told him he was having sex with older men."

It is almost unbelievable that anyone would support this President and his chosen Czars that now run our country.

Originally Posted by billethkid

may we have your reaction to what is being presented.
The total and complete absence of commentary on these types of subjects is some what perplexing.

Non Obama supporters feel free to offer a view/perspective.

btk

I think Mother Teresa is someone we should all look up to.....

Originally Posted by cologal

I think Mother Teresa is someone we should all look up to.....

Not unexpected for you COLOGAL to ignore the radical element in this administration !!!

Cannot recall in my lifetime such folks being exposed in just a short 9 months HOWEVER.....still ok with folks like you !

Originally Posted by cologal

I think Mother Teresa is someone we should all look up to.....

I suspect that we have a better chance of getting an honest statement from Mother Teresa than anyone in this administration.

Originally Posted by Bucco

Not unexpected for you COLOGAL to ignore the radical element in this administration !!!

Cannot recall in my lifetime such folks being exposed in just a short 9 months HOWEVER.....still ok with folks like you !

Bucco....exactly how is this supposed to affect the country? Even Newt Gingrich has quote Chairman Mao. Glen Beck seems to have a staff whose only job is to pour over ages old video...speechs etc.

Originally Posted by cologal

Bucco....exactly how is this supposed to affect the country? Even Newt Gingrich has quote Chairman Mao. Glen Beck seems to have a staff whose only job is to pour over ages old video...speechs etc.

COLOGAL...of course this person is not going to affect the country and I cant imagine why you would even say something like that.

My point is, in every administration there are appointments that you can disagree with, BUT I HAVE NEVER seen such a large amount of what is easily called RADICAL people so close to a President !

Of course, still reeling over your remark...that one person does nothing to the country however having our President surrounded by folks with radical views is not very comfortable !

Now, you may not feel these people, and you do know it is not JUST THIS ONE, have the right stuff to advise our President...I respectfully disagree !

I once heard someone say "Liberalism is the most gutless choice you can make, you don't really have to take a stand for anything."

I hear a lot of that these days from folks. It absolutely does not matter what BO does. He's their guy and it's A-OK. Even if they know deep down it's bad they will somehow rationalize it away.

Czars don't matter anyway, BO is in control of things, it will all be ok. As long as it sounds good and makes you feel good it must be ok.

It's no different with the health care debate. Everyone should have insurance. That's how Liberals think. It sounds really good and makes them feel really good. Nothing else matters and the consequences be damned. It's the intention that matters.

Originally Posted by dklassen

I once heard someone say "Liberalism is the most gutless choice you can make, you don't really have to take a stand for anything."

I hear a lot of that these days from folks. It absolutely does not matter what BO does. He's their guy and it's A-OK. Even if they know deep down it's bad they will somehow rationalize it away.

Czars don't matter anyway, BO is in control of things, it will all be ok. As long as it sounds good and makes you feel good it must be ok.

It's no different with the health care debate. Everyone should have insurance. That's how Liberals think. It sounds really good and makes them feel really good. Nothing else matters and the consequences be damned. It's the intention that matters.

Do you realize that GW Bush had more CZAR's than Obama....probably not because Fox Noise failed to tell you that.

So predictable, that's my point exactly. Doesn't matter who the current Czars are, what they believe or where they came from. GW had a few more and that's all that matters.

If BO the anointed one appointed them they must be ok. After all, he only has the best intentions for us all.

"Kevin Jennings, the radical homosexual activist who founded one of the biggest organizations in the nation to promote "gay" activities in public schools, needs to "come clean," according to the Washington Times.

"A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sophomore that he was having homosexual sex with an 'older man.' At the very least, statutory rape occurred. Fox News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse. That former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama's 'safe school czar.' ... Clearly, the process for vetting White House employees has broken down," the Times editorial board said.

"In this one case in which Mr. Jennings had a real chance to protect a young boy from a sexual predator, he not only failed to do what the law required but actually encouraged the relationship."

Anyone here ok with our new "Safe School Czar"

Cologal?

Fox News pointed out that Bush had as many advisors as Obama.

They also pointed out that they were not called Csars because they were Capitalists not Socialists.

Originally Posted by dklassen

So predictable, that's my point exactly. Doesn't matter who the current Czars are, what they believe or where they came from. GW had a few more and that's all that matters.

If BO the anointed one appointed them they must be ok. After all, he only has the best intentions for us all.





Anyone here ok with our new "Safe School Czar"

Cologal?

First of all we have heard at length about Obama appointing all of these czar and how bad that was...then only to find out that the previous administration appointed more. But of course that doesn't matter because to point that out is Bush bashing and clearly no one around here bashes the current administration.

Let me think....is that the one that Hannity has the hots for?

So why is this guy so bad.......

He is gay...could that be the problem? He was a member of ACT UP a group whose purpose it was to call attention to the AIDS crisis when the Regan administration had their head in the sand. I would recommend you read the book "And the Band Played On". The people you listen to would have us believe that ACT UP promotes the radical homosexual agenda...I wish just once someone would explain that Bull**** to me. Or maybe its because he did drugs. Nah that can't be it because ole Rushie did drugs and Bushie was a drunk look at them now....Maybe its because he shouldn't be in this position maybe its the wrong position kinda like Gail Norton being Secretary of the Interior. Having Norton in that position was like picking a German Shepard to the Secretary of Cats.

Clearly Hannity is always right.....and he really isn't worried about Beck pushing him out of his prime time spot on Fox.

Originally Posted by cashman

Fox News pointed out that Bush had as many advisor's as Obama.

They also pointed out that they were not called Czars because they were Capitalists not Socialists.

I really don't think that the real Czars were Socialists either...Go back and check your history the Russian Czar were royalty overthrown by the Communists.

Once again WRONG. No socialists here.