Originally Posted by Guest

I agree with most posters on here that I could not imagine voting for someone for the highest office of the land who is that careless and/or untrustworthy. Even if I had intended to vote for her in the first place, that would be the final straw.

Interestingly, I was just on a 3-day getaway with a bunch of women and when talk of Hillary came up, the resounding opinion was the same. Maybe 4+ years ago, some would have voted for her but after her stint as SOS, all said that they would never vote for her now. It seems that those who did not realize, or were in denial of who she really is, have now reached an epiphany. We can only hope that this extrapolates to the masses and that our country will be saved from the likes of Hillary as President.

Originally Posted by Guest

I absolutely love this ludicrous comment!

Let's turn back to 2008. Let's substitute in "die hard conservatives to back such a poor choice to represent the Republican party. Let's substitute "woman vice presidential candidate". WE HAVE SARAH PALIN.

Go ahead with the bash Palin diversion. Palin is not running for office now, so "HELLOooo" pay attention. Clinton is the subject of today, not Palin or Bush or Reagan, or Lincoln.

Originally Posted by Guest

FOX under the influence of the right wing GOP made Hilary break the law. It's a conspiracy, just like how they made it up that she was (not) shot at, and her husband had an affair. As a matter of fact, they must have paid Lewinsky to "not" have sex with Bill. It's all a FOX and Republican conspiracy. Even though she admitted to using a non-gov server for her gov work. Even though she knew it was wrong. It's those pesky republicans and FOX that made this stuff up.

Does this not make folks think, just a little bit about how serious it is to elect a person that blatantly disregards rules and laws? Someone that has total disregard for national security? What kind of mind set do these die hard liberals have to have to back such a poor choice to represent the Democrat party? But, by all means elect your first woman president. You didn't vet your choice for first black president and look at what we have. And you wonder why we have no respect for your continued poor choices? Thank goodness this election will be settled by the Independent voters. Someone has to be the parents in this family.

Are these the same Independent voters who decided the elections of 2008 and 2012?

IMO: This whole email server issue can be solved if The Clinton Foundation deletes all their correspondence from this particular server and transfers their records to a new server. Then the government, or whoever, can have all of the remaining information. The same government has no reason to see any of the Clinton Foundation Records without probable cause.

Bill Clinton is a very, very smart individual and probably thought of this solution himself, without my help. After all, he is going to be credited with singlehandedly bringing down the republican party by encouraging Donald Trump to run for president, if current published reports are true.

Originally Posted by Guest

Are these the same Independent voters who decided the elections of 2008 and 2012?

IMO: This whole email server issue can be solved if The Clinton Foundation deletes all their correspondence from this particular server and transfers their records to a new server. Then the government, or whoever, can have all of the remaining information. The same government has no reason to see any of the Clinton Foundation Records without probable cause.

Bill Clinton is a very, very smart individual and probably thought of this solution himself, without my help. After all, he is going to be credited with singlehandedly bringing down the republican party by encouraging Donald Trump to run for president, if current published reports are true.

You don't have an understanding of the rules and laws regarding gov property. Let me see if I can make it a bit simpler. If a police officer pulls out his notes while on the stand, his WHOLE notebook can be scrutinized by the court. That's the law of evidence.

The server not only had possible security violations regarding classified material, but it had gov correspondence on it. The whole server can be seized as evidence. Tampering with evidence is breaking the law and can be construed as obstruction of justice or hampering of an official investigation.

As far as your glee about bringing down the Republican party, I wonder why your type gets bent out of shape when your party has been labeled rightly the socialist party. You are obviously NOT Democratic.

And do you REALLY think that the Clintons can be trusted to delete only Foundation information? If so, I have some ocean front property in Kentucky that I'll sell you REAL cheap.

If you think that Clinton is smart and deserves credit for anything, then it's obvious that you are lacking in scruples, ethics and morality. Not an accusation, just an observation. Pond scum may have it's uses, but it's still nasty.

Originally Posted by Guest

You don't have an understanding of the rules and laws regarding gov property. Let me see if I can make it a bit simpler. If a police officer pulls out his notes while on the stand, his WHOLE notebook can be scrutinized by the court. That's the law of evidence.

The server not only had possible security violations regarding classified material, but it had gov correspondence on it. The whole server can be seized as evidence. Tampering with evidence is breaking the law and can be construed as obstruction of justice or hampering of an official investigation.

As far as your glee about bringing down the Republican party, I wonder why your type gets bent out of shape when your party has been labeled rightly the socialist party. You are obviously NOT Democratic.

And do you REALLY think that the Clintons can be trusted to delete only Foundation information? If so, I have some ocean front property in Kentucky that I'll sell you REAL cheap.

If you think that Clinton is smart and deserves credit for anything, then it's obvious that you are lacking in scruples, ethics and morality. Not an accusation, just an observation. Pond scum may have it's uses, but it's still nasty.

Finally a post that is not condescending or demeaning in any way. You must have proofread it carefully before hitting send. BTW, the general consensus is that Bill Clinton is indeed smart, both intellectually and streetwise. Both sides of the aisle know this.

Originally Posted by Guest

Go ahead with the bash Palin diversion. Palin is not running for office now, so "HELLOooo" pay attention. Clinton is the subject of today, not Palin or Bush or Reagan, or Lincoln.

No, it is just too easy to bash Palin and her reality television family. Well, okay, just one dig at her wonderful parenting skills. Bristol gets pregnant twice - and the second time while engaged to a different guy(a Medal of Honor recipient) than the baby daddy- and speaking to teens about abstinence. What a role model!

Originally Posted by Guest

No, it is just too easy to bash Palin and her reality television family. Well, okay, just one dig at her wonderful parenting skills. Bristol gets pregnant twice - and the second time while engaged to a different guy(a Medal of Honor recipient) than the baby daddy- and speaking to teens about abstinence. What a role model!

Did she go to planned parenthood and get an abortion so that they can sell the baby parts? And how much of this effects your vote for Billary (if she isn't in jail)?

Tell you what, if Billary and Palin were to visit Barnes and Noble next week, which one of them do you think would get the largest audience? I know where I would be. Hillary looks too much like something out of my favorite TV show (Walking Dead). If I am going to get bitten by one of them, I think it...........

Stay on point. If you can't, don't post.

Originally Posted by Guest

No, it is just too easy to bash Palin and her reality television family. Well, okay, just one dig at her wonderful parenting skills. Bristol gets pregnant twice - and the second time while engaged to a different guy(a Medal of Honor recipient) than the baby daddy- and speaking to teens about abstinence. What a role model!

Originally Posted by Guest

Don't believe everything you hear on Fox News.

The answer to your two questions are no and no

And you are wrong and wrong.

Originally Posted by Guest

Fox News has nothing to do with this.

You think using a personal system behind the back of the President (which is true) is using good judgement ?

You think that using this personal computer system do to the classified work of the Secy of State which has been deemed by the Justice Dept and FBI as not secure is good judgement ?

You think that using this personal server and then saying to the country...trust me which is what happened is good judgement ?

I sure want you to make no decision on my behalf.

And by the way, and I can repeat them...NOTHING I READ was from FOX NEWS...not one thing....gee, it has been all over the news...what is it that you watch that is not covering this story ?

I will give you this...you sure have total and complete dedication to your political party if you find this is using good judgement

Absolutely right!

Originally Posted by Guest

If this turns out to be nothing, people are going to scream that it was a cover up. People here are already doing that. When I say people, I mean Republicans.

How did this come up? It was the fifth Benghazi congressional hearing. Trey Gowdy with his slip of the tongue calling it a prosecution. When you talk about good judgment, are you talking about leaking classified documents, or her judgment in thinking Republicans won't use everything and anything real or imaginary to bring Clinton down?

That's really funny. It's all a GOP conspiracy to beat her, right?

Romney was a bully because of a childhood prank, that no can prove even happened.
Romney didn't pay his taxes (Reid) but that was a lie.
Romney is a Mormon so Christians shouldn't vote for him. Even though liberals are atheists and baby killers.
Palin had chest implants - lies
Palin said that Obamacare would have death panels, ha,ha and it turned out to be true and the Dems changed it. They still have panels to cut of treatment though.
Bush planned 9/11

Do we really need to go through all the lies perpetrated by liberals so that they can get all indignant?

Clinton's problems are not fabricated. They're true. She even admitted them. She says "what difference does it make?"

Originally Posted by Guest

That's really funny. It's all a GOP conspiracy to beat her, right?

Romney was a bully because of a childhood prank, that no can prove even happened.
Romney didn't pay his taxes (Reid) but that was a lie.
Romney is a Mormon so Christians shouldn't vote for him. Even though liberals are atheists and baby killers.
Palin had chest implants - lies
Palin said that Obamacare would have death panels, ha,ha and it turned out to be true and the Dems changed it. They still have panels to cut of treatment though.
Bush planned 9/11

Do we really need to go through all the lies perpetrated by liberals so that they can get all indignant?

Clinton's problems are not fabricated. They're true. She even admitted them. She says "what difference does it make?"

You should not be so cruel as it's obvious that liberalism is a mental diisorder! what:

Originally Posted by Guest

You should not be so cruel as it's obvious that liberalism is a mental diisorder! what:

Ouch!! So harsh!!