Originally Posted by Guest

Well Rockyard. It isn't much of a choice for sure.
I stand with the traditional folks, members of the GOP, usually successful, older and have a lot of experience in winning in life in their backpack.

You mean the ones who disowned Trump early on and still have their back turned ?

But the gave up the GOP romSteve Bannon via Trump. He owns it.

A Trump loss or win will assure Democrats rout in 2018 and they will own congress. If he wins the Democrats will control everything for a long long time.

Believe it or not, his candidacy has given the Democratic Party the good guy position, which in the past was all Republican

Bill and Hillary are responsible for the deaths of over 50 people associated with them.

Bill has sex with 13 year old girls

Hillary is a lesbian.

Since we are going to put out there, all the questionable incidents in politicians' lives, we might as well put ALL the unproven speculation.

All that may be true, BUT look at the direction our country is going AND look at who has been part of this awful direction...not TRUMP....

When you know the first thing out of someone's mouth is I'm going to sue, you think twice before saying anything, especially if they have deep pockets. Here is an interesting story on Roy Cohn and Trump.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/us...-roy-cohn.html

I don't understand the world of inherited wealth and power.

Originally Posted by Guest

Partisan kool aide in the remaining hours of desparation.

How about an equally critical assessment of Clinton's illegal , law breaking, security violating felonious activity with the same magnifying glass.

Nobody, certainly me has disagreed with any critique of Clinton.

All I have tried to point out is that allowing NOTHING BUT HATE of Clinton to motivate you is not very bright.

1. Her proposals are much better than his. I mean by light years. Her proposals do not reduce the budget, but his take the debt to an unheard of level. Just one example.

2. If Trump is elected, all YOU rail against with the Democrats will simply get larger. He is universally hated within his own party. He ha ZERO chance of unifying the country, thus the Democrats will own congress after 2018 and for a long time.

3. If Trump wins, Steve Bannon will be your king forever. He if the conspiracy theories, etc. I believe justbthat is enough not to support Trump.

Lastly, those of you who think that being opposed tomTrump means you support Clinton are not paying attention. Read a stat today, something like 28% of mail in ballots in Florida alone FROM REPUBLICANS were not voting Trump.

It is your country, and the future of your kids and grab
No kids, and NO..NO...NO do I support Clinton, but as hard as it might be for you to accept, Clinton is the best choice given the alternative.

Originally Posted by Guest

All that may be true, BUT look at the direction our country is going AND look at who has been part of this awful direction...not TRUMP....

You are correct. I suggest you look at congress and the refusal of the so called Tea Party to even consider compromise...that is why Boehner packed it in...and you get your answer.

This country always ha been based on compromise. Already "our congress" says if Clinton wins we will bring government to a halt. That blame is easily placed.

Originally Posted by Guest

Bill and Hillary are responsible for the deaths of over 50 people associated with them.

Bill has sex with 13 year old girls

Hillary is a lesbian.

Since we are going to put out there, all the questionable incidents in politicians' lives, we might as well put ALL the unproven speculation.

You might want to look up the word "alleged" and learn its definition.

Why are so many Republicans not questioning why Russia is so interested in getting Trump elected?

Surely they don't think that the e-mail hacks only being about Hillary and the DNC, is by chance do they?

Can someone hate Hillary so much, that they have no problem with Putin (who IS Russia) trying to give the election to Trump?

I can't even fathom the depth of that kind of hatred.

Hold onto the Senate. Mitch Daniels 2020. If the Republican majority House would stop spending more money than they take in that would be a great help. Politics will not change with Trump, only a real balanced budget amendment will change politics. There is no downside for pols and voters to continuing as we are now. IMO

Originally Posted by Guest

You will need to supply a link or more to that story. I certainly cannot locate it and it should be big news.

Either you misunderstood or just made it up.

Please never doubt the veracity of what I post.

It was reported live on Fox a short while age and repeated on Brit Hume

see Bret Baier (@BretBaier) | Twitter

"I said sources described an "avalanche of evidence" in case & barring obstruction they'd likely continue 2 push to try for an indictment""

YOu will not see it on the other cables they secret 95%

the gal who civilly is accusing rape....or...the states going after Trump U ?

Trump U no plaintiff, the other case that girl was thrown out of court several times, she keeps finding lawyers to bring her case. at best his word against hers if it gets that far.
No one is taking about in the news

They will be tied to foreign countries, and not exclusively Russia, various SERIOUS mob ties,. They are the two largest, but CERTAINLY not limited to those two areas.

No one is talking about mob ties, Russia issue was dropped by FBI yesterday.

Where the hell do get your news?

try reading few here grasshopper There's more than the Clinton News Network

Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) | Twitter
Trey Gowdy (@TGowdySC) | Twitter
Jason Chaffetz (@jasoninthehouse) | Twitter
Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) | Twitter
https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle
https://twitter.com/mitchellvii

Originally Posted by Guest

he will make Bill Clinton a choir boy.

No one can

Originally Posted by Guest

If hillary is indicted obama will pardon her. Then you will know the democrats true face.

He can't pardon her till after trial, do you think that will happen before Jan 20?

He also will not damage his legacy with an Abuse of Power

Originally Posted by Guest

Why are so many Republicans not questioning why Russia is so interested in getting Trump elected?

Surely they don't think that the e-mail hacks only being about Hillary and the DNC, is by chance do they?

Can someone hate Hillary so much, that they have no problem with Putin (who IS Russia) trying to give the election to Trump?

I can't even fathom the depth of that kind of hatred.

The reason you can't is you have your head in the sand,
FBI just found no connection to Russia, yesterday, case closed

the hacks were Wikileaks not Russia, move on

Originally Posted by Guest

Please never doubt the veracity of what I post.

It was reported live on Fox a short while age and repeated on Brit Hume

see Bret Baier (@BretBaier) | Twitter

"I said sources described an "avalanche of evidence" in case & barring obstruction they'd likely continue 2 push to try for an indictment""

YOu will not see it on the other cables they secret 95%



Trump U, the other case that girl was thrown out of court several times, she keeps finding lawyers to bring her case. at best his word against hers if it gets that far.



No one is talking about mob ties, Russia issue was dropped by FBI yesterday.

Where the hell do get your news?

try reading few here grasshopper There's more than the Clinton News Network

Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) | Twitter
Trey Gowdy (@TGowdySC) | Twitter
Jason Chaffetz (@jasoninthehouse) | Twitter
Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) | Twitter
https://twitter.com/IngrahamAngle
https://twitter.com/mitchellvii







No one can





He can't pardon her till after trial, do you think that will happen before Jan 20?

He also will not damage his legacy with an Abuse of Power

Hard to comment on all of this.

I suggest you find the difference between an opinion pices and news. That would help a lot.

I also suggest you widen you reading. NO, the media does not lie. You just nedvto read. Example, the gal suing had her case thrown out the first time because she had no lawyer, and it was thrown out on a LEGAL technicality, not a factual difference. She now has lawyers.

Originally Posted by Guest

The reason you can't is you have your head in the sand,
FBI just found no connection to Russia, yesterday, case closed

Wrong.

They stated that they haven't found any "clear link" to Russia (meaning 'yet'). That certainly doesn't mean there isn't any.

The USA's intelligent community has told Trump and Pence that they are certain Russia is behind the leaks, but only Trump (not even Pence) is refusing to believe it.

Why do you think that is?

Trump refusal to accept government assessments on Russian hacks dismays former officials - The Washington Post

Former senior U.S. national security officials are dismayed at Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s repeated refusal to accept the judgment of intelligence professionals that Russia stole files from the Democratic National Committee computers in an effort to influence the U.S. election.

The former officials, who have served presidents in both parties, say they were bewildered when Trump cast doubt on Russia’s role after receiving a classified briefing on the subject and again after an unusually blunt statement from U.S. agencies saying they were “confident” that Moscow had orchestrated the attacks.

Once again, I ask why Wikileaks is only obsessing with Hillary and the DNC?

Here is an interesting article that would raise huge questions from any reasonable person.

Julian Assange Is A Russian Front-Man, Not A Freedom Fighter

For more sensible people, however, the evidence is damning. First and foremost, WikiLeaks—citizens of the world that they are—never seem able to leak anything damaging to the interests of the Russians. They likewise avoid antagonizing the Chinese or any other autocratic regime that might take umbrage or engage in retaliation.

Almost every leak of any consequence is aimed squarely at the United States and its allies, and never as assistance to noble activists anywhere else.

Likewise, the involvement of WikiLeaks in the Edward Snowden affair, catalogued ably by authors like John Schindler, Edward Lucas, and others, was so obviously facilitated by the Russians that it should be used as a case study in Espionage School 101. Recall that when Snowden showed up in Russia—a destination Assange recommended—WikiLeaks dispatched a fixer from their staff named Sarah Harrison to meet Snowden in Hong Kong and stand by his side in Moscow. From the time Snowden arrived in Russia, Harrison stuck to him like glue.

the hacks were Wikileaks not Russia, move on

Hey, if you hate Hillary more than you love this country and aren't concerned about how much effort is being made by Putin/Russia in trying to affect this election...you might as well just admit it.

And I guarantee that if Trump's e-mails were also being released, you and the rest of the Trump supporters would be calling on taking massive action against Russia.

Simply unbelievable.

Originally Posted by Guest

the gal suing had her case thrown out the first time because she had no lawyer, and it was thrown out on a LEGAL technicality, not a factual difference. She now has lawyers.

Really who should read

The accuser initially filed the case on her own behalf in California, but it was tossed for not stating an articulable violation of her civil rights. The case has since been refiled in New York, under the representation of a patent lawyer named Thomas Meagher.

A patent lawyer handling the case hasn’t inspired the most confidence.

the whole case has zero media interest due to accusers credibility along with an ambulance chaser layer try to get his name in the news.

they don't want to go down that rabbit hole.

this issue isn't worth discussing

Originally Posted by Guest

Really who should read

The accuser initially filed the case on her own behalf in California, but it was tossed for not stating an articulable violation of her civil rights. The case has since been refiled in New York, under the representation of a patent lawyer named Thomas Meagher.

A patent lawyer handling the case hasn’t inspired the most confidence.

the whole case has zero media interest due to accusers credibility along with an ambulance chaser layer try to get his name in the news.

they don't want to go down that rabbit hole.

this issue isn't worth discussing

Maybe...we will see as she has a lawyer and hearing up coming.

Did you ever think you would be defending a possible President on rape charges of a child ? Or for conning folks ?

One case of the women gets to court and he must testify, and we shall see I suppose.

By the way, just to be sure you understand, if Clinton violated the law, she should be indicted. Please....those against Trump do not feel she gets a pass.