Originally Posted by Guest

Dear Poster:

You poor devil you are now chasing ghosts. I read though this entire thread as I always do on every thread before I speak AND GUESS WHAT I NEVER MADE ONE COMMENT HERE. and, yet here you are taking my name in vain, defaming me slandering me and making up fake news and noise. Oh yea its called being a progressives who work as collectives and attempt their poor imitation of alinsky speak.

Now my comments. trump was wrong to address the issue of Nordstrom's policy. He was wrong to respond to Howard Stern and should have reprimanded him immediately for such talk about his daughter. And anyone watching Stern has stronger stomach than me because i view Stern in the same manner as I do kardashian and The View, The Talk, etc mindless noise.

As for Ivana Trump the problem progressives have is that Ivana has broken many class ceilings and she has done so outside the feminist collective. And they hate her because she is beautiful. We have all seen it played out incorporation when some want-to-be thinks he/she is being passed over because the employee getting all the intention is handsome or beautiful and so they work to under mine their target never offer the opportunity to determine if in fact said employee really has the necessary bona fides.

Personal Best Regards:

Did you read post 19 ? The post where both of us were referenced ? I do not post generalities. If I disagree with you I will be specific. YOUR NAME was taken in post 19, but you knew that because you read it all. I suggest that you appear to be a VERY SELECTIVE reader. I suggest you avoid anything of substance unless it can be turned into an attack on other large groups.

I am not a "poor devil" as you refer to me and am not "chasing ghosts". I responded DIRECTLY to post 19.

In addition, I mentioned, not by name because they were not mentioned by name in post 19, others like you who avoid issues and attempt to turn everything into some attack on others.

Example, I do not like Trump, but have made it clear that I agree with the basis of his EO, and suggested based on factual reading how he might succeed.

I WILL ASK YOU SINCE YOU DIRECTLY ACCUSED ME OF WHAT YOU CALL FAKE NEWS. PLEASE BE SPECIFIC IN YOUR CHARGE. WHEN I ACCUSED YOU OF PLAGARISM TWICE, I SUPPLIED LINKS..WHEN YOU COPIED FROM RUSSIAN FAKE NEWS SITES, I GAVE THE LINKS SO PEOPLE COULD SEE. WHEN YOU ACCUSED, USING MADE UP STORIES ABOUT CNN REPORTING, I SUPPLIED LINKS AND INFORMATION TO YOU. PLEASE DO THE SAME FOR ME.

Of course, but every single response from you is the same...it NEVER changes. You twist until you can lecture (NOT DISCUSS) in the evils of ALL progressives.

Your un yielding defense of Trump is legend. You are silent on Trumps criticism of members of the judicial...you are silent on his public critique of Nordstrom...facts is, no matter the issue, you will defend him and his group, no matter what, and then jump into a lecture condemning many millions of Americans that you label as one.

Your even commenting on Ivanka Trumps looks is offensive and personal. Unless I missed it, younstand alone in making her looks some kind of issue.

I cannot wait to hear your defense of Gen. Flynn, or any lie told by the White House.

Originally Posted by Guest

‘Go buy Ivanka’s stuff!’: Kellyanne Conway gives president’s daughter ‘free commercial’ on Fox

This from a Presidential spokeswoman.

Ivanka Trum does look like a class act but this reeks coming from Kellyanne CONway.

It is beyond time for Conway to be fired !!!

Ivanka's line of clothes are all manufactured in China. What happened to buy American, hire American? That's for others, not the family of scum-sucking, bottom feeders.

IMO Nordstrom's can expect a big increase in sales.

Originally Posted by janmcn

Ivanka's line of clothes are all manufactured in China. What happened to buy American, hire American? That's for others, not the family of scum-sucking, bottom feeders.

IMO Nordstrom's can expect a big increase in sales.

Stock is up 7%.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Can any of the Trump supporters explain WHY the Donald Trump clothing as well as the Ivanka Trump clothing is made overseas and NOT in the USA since he proclaims to be such a great patriot?

There also has been much said on the higher prices that Americans will be paying for products made in Mexico. Most of the talk has centered on avacodos or beer. You do realize, I hope, that American cars have many internal components that are made in Mexico. This 20% import tax being talked about is going to add a few THOUSAND more dollars to car prices. What sayest thou about that, Trump supporters?

Originally Posted by Guest

It is beyond time for Conway to be fired !!!

Really?

Where were these cries for someones head to toll when much more significant actions were undertaken or said by Obama people.

She said something about the presidents daughter's clothing line. This is an example of issues of substance or significance?

Of course not. Only for the resistance folks, those who haven't accepted the loss in November 2016, those who are part of the establishment that feels threatened who are busy and dedicated to making banquets out of ham sandwiches.

Talking about a line of clothes?

How lowly, pathetic, desparate can the bar go?

Originally Posted by Guest

Really?

Where were these cries for someones head to toll when much more significant actions were undertaken or said by Obama people.

She said something about the presidents daughter's clothing line. This is an example of issues of substance or significance?

Of course not. Only for the resistance folks, those who haven't accepted the loss in November 2016, those who are part of the establishment that feels threatened who are busy and dedicated to making banquets out of ham sandwiches.

Talking about a line of clothes?

How lowly, pathetic, desparate can the bar go?

This is pathetic, and illustrates how brain washed you people are.

This is a member of the White House staff. If this happened with any President, in any WH, Republican or Democrat, every American should not be shocked, but scared.

You really make this about of line of clothes ? You actually are ok with the lack of ethics involved. You support this behavior, and then wonder about our children's education. You are supposedly a mature adult, and this post is supposed to represent your narrow, shallow thinking ?

"“The most fatal illusion is the settled point of view. Since life is growth and motion, a fixed point of view kills anybody who has one.”
― Brooks Atkinson

Originally Posted by Guest

This is pathetic, and illustrates how brain washed you people are.

This is a member of the White House staff. If this happened with any President, in any WH, Republican or Democrat, every American should not be shocked, but scared.

You really make this about of line of clothes ? You actually are ok with the lack of ethics involved. You support this behavior, and then wonder about our children's education. You are supposedly a mature adult, and this post is supposed to represent your narrow, shallow thinking ?

"“The most fatal illusion is the settled point of view. Since life is growth and motion, a fixed point of view kills anybody who has one.”
― Brooks Atkinson

I at no time said I supported anything of the kind.

What was obviously missed or intentionally ignored was the message. There really are more significant issues of substance and bigger fish to fry.

And if there were no ethics issues by the Obama WH over 8 years then nobody else following him has a problem what so ever with anything.

Originally Posted by Guest

I at no time said I supported anything of the kind.

What was obviously missed or intentionally ignored was the message. There really are more significant issues of substance and bigger fish to fry.

And if there were no ethics issues by the Obama WH over 8 years then nobody else following him has a problem what so ever with anything.

Your obsession with Obama on almost every post on "significant issues of substance" is disturbin.

Obama malfeasance, terrible policies, Clinton whatever is NO excuse for unethical behavior or lack of competence of this administration.

Originally Posted by Guest

I at no time said I supported anything of the kind.

What was obviously missed or intentionally ignored was the message. There really are more significant issues of substance and bigger fish to fry.

And if there were no ethics issues by the Obama WH over 8 years then nobody else following him has a problem what so ever with anything.

btm - what part of "ethics" don't you understand? Conway violated the law. She needs to be terminated completely from the administration. Your minister needs to counsel you further on the difference between right and wrong. Maybe the new pastor will do that.

Originally Posted by Guest

Did you read post 19 ? The post where both of us were referenced ? I do not post generalities. If I disagree with you I will be specific. YOUR NAME was taken in post 19, but you knew that because you read it all. I suggest that you appear to be a VERY SELECTIVE reader. I suggest you avoid anything of substance unless it can be turned into an attack on other large groups.

I am not a "poor devil" as you refer to me and am not "chasing ghosts". I responded DIRECTLY to post 19.

In addition, I mentioned, not by name because they were not mentioned by name in post 19, others like you who avoid issues and attempt to turn everything into some attack on others.

Example, I do not like Trump, but have made it clear that I agree with the basis of his EO, and suggested based on factual reading how he might succeed.

I WILL ASK YOU SINCE YOU DIRECTLY ACCUSED ME OF WHAT YOU CALL FAKE NEWS. PLEASE BE SPECIFIC IN YOUR CHARGE. WHEN I ACCUSED YOU OF PLAGARISM TWICE, I SUPPLIED LINKS..WHEN YOU COPIED FROM RUSSIAN FAKE NEWS SITES, I GAVE THE LINKS SO PEOPLE COULD SEE. WHEN YOU ACCUSED, USING MADE UP STORIES ABOUT CNN REPORTING, I SUPPLIED LINKS AND INFORMATION TO YOU. PLEASE DO THE SAME FOR ME.

Of course, but every single response from you is the same...it NEVER changes. You twist until you can lecture (NOT DISCUSS) in the evils of ALL progressives.

Your un yielding defense of Trump is legend. You are silent on Trumps criticism of members of the judicial...you are silent on his public critique of Nordstrom...facts is, no matter the issue, you will defend him and his group, no matter what, and then jump into a lecture condemning many millions of Americans that you label as one.

Your even commenting on Ivanka Trumps looks is offensive and personal. Unless I missed it, younstand alone in making her looks some kind of issue.

I cannot wait to hear your defense of Gen. Flynn, or any lie told by the White House.

Look pal, I made several attempts to work with you and to get along. You appear are argumentative by nature. I don't know if its honest or a put on and i really don't care. Again I never posted on this thread and only did when you used my name in vain. Its all in print and all for the board to see. Please you want to be the winner here. OK you win I am everything you claim Now go away

Personal Best Regards:

Back to the topic.

Ivanka's best move would be to sell her line (online). she doen't need brcik and mortar.

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Look pal, I made several attempts to work with you and to get along. You appear are argumentative by nature. I don't know if its honest or a put on and i really don't care. Again I never posted on this thread and only did when you used my name in vain. Its all in print and all for the board to see. Please you want to be the winner here. OK you win I am everything you claim Now go away

Personal Best Regards:

Yep...your name was used in response to a comment about me by name, not by you, but also referring to you.

I responded because you clearly said you read every post but obviously missed that one so I pointed it out to you by number.

You then accused me of some kind of fake news, and I challenged you to show me how or where as I did in your two cases of PLAGARISM, and fake news cites.

You several attempts with me have been to avoid and express contempt.

So, PAL, you accuse a lot of people of a lot of things, then preach. I simply ask you to back up your accusations, and always will.

You have avoided backing up accusations about millions of Americans, and I thought it would be easy for you to back up your accusation about me personally. If you avoided accusations with no regard to proving what you say, and your silly little accusations, might be better..

I just do not like you to make accusations with no foundation, and pretend you don't understand. I suspect you understand very clearly.

Stick with the rules of TOTV, stop with saying things about others with no backup...opinion are fine, but you ACCUSE, and in this case you accused me.

Originally Posted by rubicon

Look pal, I made several attempts to work with you and to get along. You appear are argumentative by nature. I don't know if its honest or a put on and i really don't care. Again I never posted on this thread and only did when you used my name in vain. Its all in print and all for the board to see. Please you want to be the winner here. OK you win I am everything you claim Now go away

Personal Best Regards:

PBR has been watching old Humphrey Bogart movies again.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

PBR has been watching old Humphrey Bogart movies again.

I wonder if RubiTHECon has to stand on his soapbox to see the screen?