Originally Posted by Guest

Naive is perhaps a better description of liberals than "open minded". I have also found that while liberals claim to be open minded, they are not open minded when it comes to dissenting opinions, ideas, views and ideology.

Very good response. Short and concise.

Originally Posted by Guest

Liberals have always been easy to fool.

Originally Posted by Guest

I knew you weren't human but you certainly had me fooled for a little while.

What part did you not agree with? Or, are you a typical female and just don't like hearing the truth? Does it injure your PC sensitivities?

Originally Posted by Guest

What does that have to do with anything? A baseball player paid $55 million a year can still understand what it is like to bat at a baseball thrown by a college player paid nothing.


She sounded a lot better than Donald Trump whose hate filled rhetoric has already done a lot of damage to this country.

I have not heard Trump say he "hates" anyone. I guess your liberal talking points need to be updated. Are you sure you are not using 2008 campaign talking points?

I have heard Trump say that he loves the Military, the Police, the firefighters, etc. I have heard him say that he wants to make America great again, after Obama goes on his "apology" tours and disparages America. I have heard Trump say he wishes to protect our manufacturing industry. I have heard him say he wishes to reduce crime in America. I have heard him mention that he wants to protect national security (unlike Hillary's disregard for the same). So, say again where you heard him say he "hates" anyone?

My focus has always been about "we the people". I would not and have never supported anyone irrespective of label that did not have this nation's interest at heart. Despite the 24/7 spin if a voter looks objectively s/he will be able to see the real person behind the mask.

I am saddened that our trusted leaders thought so little of "we the little people" that they concocted a weak accounting of why Hillary should not be charged. This sort of corruption is natural to Russia, /China, /cuba or other Latin American countries but America.

People are out in the streets protesting Trump, cops etc but not one protest surrounding the inside cover up job conducted by our president, attorney general and top cop...where is the outrage

Originally Posted by Guest

Naive is perhaps a better description of liberals than "open minded". I have also found that while liberals claim to be open minded, they are not open minded when it comes to dissenting opinions, ideas, views and ideology.

I'll put it this way. If I was at work and I didn't like the philosophy or decision of the boss at that time, I could discuss that with my friends at lunch. Some friends would agree and some would disagree, but none of us wanted him dead.

There were others who wanted him dead but they weren't my friends. They had no moral compass.

Originally Posted by Guest

My focus has always been about "we the people". I would not and have never supported anyone irrespective of label that did not have this nation's interest at heart. Despite the 24/7 spin if a voter looks objectively s/he will be able to see the real person behind the mask.

I am saddened that our trusted leaders thought so little of "we the little people" that they concocted a weak accounting of why Hillary should not be charged. This sort of corruption is natural to Russia, /China, /cuba or other Latin American countries but America.

People are out in the streets protesting Trump, cops etc but not one protest surrounding the inside cover up job conducted by our president, attorney general and top cop...where is the outrage

Ditto....

Originally Posted by Guest

I'll put it this way. If I was at work and I didn't like the philosophy or decision of the boss at that time, I could discuss that with my friends at lunch. Some friends would agree and some would disagree, but none of us wanted him dead.

There were others who wanted him dead but they weren't my friends. They had no moral compass.

BLM line the streets and demand death to police. Which of the two do you think they will be voting for? These are supposed liberals and will vote for Hillary. Hillary tells us in her speeches that "whites" need to understand blacks." She sympathizes with BLM and she endorses their violent behavior.

Hillary understands................

how to manipulate the weak minded for their vote.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, you called it right!

Donald Trump IS "Bird crap on a rail". Yes, Hillary ISbetter than Trump!

Now that is a convincing argument !

I am certain that you have changed the vote of many on this site !

Originally Posted by Guest

I'm watching a speech by Hillary broadcasting live. She was explaining how she understood the economic inequalities in America. Although I'm not surprised a lot of Americans are hanging on every word. Someone who earns a quarter of a million dollars for a :45 speech, an amount some working people in this country would take 10 years to earn, shouldn't be even entering this discussion. Just for record I am not a Trump supporter, I'm writing in Mitch Daniels from Indiana.

Vote for a real candidate...one of the 3rd party, someone you'd like to see win.

Originally Posted by Guest

What does that have to do with anything? A baseball player paid $55 million a year can still understand what it is like to bat at a baseball thrown by a college player paid nothing.


She sounded a lot better than Donald Trump whose hate filled rhetoric has already done a lot of damage to this country.

The parties, both D and R are what did the damage, and you'll vote for ANOTHER crook.

Originally Posted by Guest

The Clintons only become interested in income inequality during election season. In all her years of public service, what has she done to solve the income inequality problem - NOTHING! She even pays her female staff less than her male staff.

They probably do less work. Very rarely are men and women's jobs "identical". Even in an office, the men usually do the "hard or dirty work". We're more valuable to have around, we're more versatile, broken nails and messed hair doesn't preclude doing what is necessary.

Originally Posted by Guest

the title of the thread;

Clinton understands.....is an oxymoron!!!

Clinton is not merely just bird $hit on a rail. She is bird$hit on the rail that has fermented and aged in the sun before hatching. Hence she is above other non fermented and AGED bird$****!!

She is VERY cleaver, cleaver enough to fool you.

Originally Posted by Guest

from your source


"During her time in the U.S. Senate, Clinton paid women in her office 72 cents for each dollar paid to men, according to a report by Washington Free Beacon."

Who is the Washington Beacon?

"The Washington Free Beacon is an American politically conservative political journalism website that publishes news and opinion commentary."

There is another site with different results and a different opinion.

Gender Pay Gap in Clinton’s Senate Office?

Again, do the SAME work men do and you'll get paid the same. Besides, if you have children, why are you working and having your children "raised" by 3rd world, ESL, Lawanda?

Originally Posted by Guest

The Pew "Research Center, for example, did estimates based on hourly earnings of both full- and part-time workers and found that women earn 84 percent of what men earn. Why? According to Pew’s surveys, women were more likely to take career interruptions to care for their family, which can hurt long-term earnings. In addition, Pew noted, “women as a whole continue to work in lower-paying occupations than men do.” And last, Pew noted “some part of the pay gap may also be due to gender discrimination.” Women were nearly twice as likely as men to report that they had been discriminated against at work because of their gender."

I think it is unrealistic to think that in all cases the salaries will be equal for many different reasons.

But were they really? Were their nails and hair more important than the work?

Men and women's interpretation of "equality" are usually very different.

Originally Posted by Guest

Hillary is just blowing smoke up everyone's posterior when she promises to make women's wages equal. They already are equal. If a woman is doing the same job, she gets paid the same. It's federal law. So, if anyone wishes to listen to her, they need to keep this in mind when she is moving her lips. SHE IS A LIAR, ALWAYS HAS BEEN AND ALWAYS WILL BE.......until she drops dead...hopefully sooner, rather than later.

She blows smoke up EVERYONE'S butt...

Originally Posted by Guest

Liberals have always been easy to fool.

Conservatives too...you're both suckers to "your party", mindlessly voting them in...to our destruction.

Originally Posted by Guest

The downside of being open minded is that you expect everyone has a moral compass.

Actually, you expect nobody has one, you expect ALL possibilities.

Originally Posted by Guest

Naive is perhaps a better description of liberals than "open minded". I have also found that while liberals claim to be open minded, they are not open minded when it comes to dissenting opinions, ideas, views and ideology.

Yes, naive IS the better descriptor. The conservatives are the same way, very UNopen minded. Abortion and religion come to mind.

Originally Posted by Guest

What part did you not agree with? Or, are you a typical female and just don't like hearing the truth? Does it injure your PC sensitivities?

They NEVER say, because they have no leg to stand on.

Originally Posted by Guest

My focus has always been about "we the people". I would not and have never supported anyone irrespective of label that did not have this nation's interest at heart. Despite the 24/7 spin if a voter looks objectively s/he will be able to see the real person behind the mask.

I am saddened that our trusted leaders thought so little of "we the little people" that they concocted a weak accounting of why Hillary should not be charged. This sort of corruption is natural to Russia, /China, /cuba or other Latin American countries but America.

People are out in the streets protesting Trump, cops etc but not one protest surrounding the inside cover up job conducted by our president, attorney general and top cop...where is the outrage

You're a source of funds...that is ALL you are to the D or R party, get that through your head and leave the party, stop voting for their corrupt crooks.

Originally Posted by Guest

I'll put it this way. If I was at work and I didn't like the philosophy or decision of the boss at that time, I could discuss that with my friends at lunch. Some friends would agree and some would disagree, but none of us wanted him dead.

There were others who wanted him dead but they weren't my friends. They had no moral compass.

Depend on what the boss was going to do...take possession of your first born? Then maybe he should be dead. Sorry, just a stupid comment to show maybe death is justified in certain cases.

Originally Posted by Guest

BLM line the streets and demand death to police. Which of the two do you think they will be voting for? These are supposed liberals and will vote for Hillary. Hillary tells us in her speeches that "whites" need to understand blacks." She sympathizes with BLM and she endorses their violent behavior.

She KNOWS that THEY will be the new majority, from age 6 down thay ARE already the majority. God help us!

WHY are you LETTING it happen?

Originally Posted by Guest

Now that is a convincing argument !

I am certain that you have changed the vote of many on this site !

May have, there's unlimited stupidity and ignorance.