IG says Hillary FAILED IG says Hillary FAILED - Page 3 - Talk of The Villages Florida

IG says Hillary FAILED

 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 05-29-2016, 02:33 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A reporter is not a subject matter expert. A liberal rag is not credible to give an unbiased opinion.

NO MALICE is required to have broken the law. But, she did have intent as evidence is in her emails to her minions, instructing them to remover classification marking before sending them to her. Even then, intent would not be necessary. The fact that classified information was removed from a secure network and distributed via a non-secure network is evidence of a broken law.

WP suggests that a hacker that plead guilty of hacking into her system/server didn't really do it, is ludicrous.

But, you liberals keep believing in republican conspiracies and UFOs and misuse your privilege to vote by voting for another radical, criminal in this case. Also a liar and a thief, as well as a tax fraud.
  #32  
Old 05-29-2016, 05:34 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
A reporter is not a subject matter expert. A liberal rag is not credible to give an unbiased opinion.

NO MALICE is required to have broken the law. But, she did have intent as evidence is in her emails to her minions, instructing them to remover classification marking before sending them to her. Even then, intent would not be necessary. The fact that classified information was removed from a secure network and distributed via a non-secure network is evidence of a broken law.

WP suggests that a hacker that plead guilty of hacking into her system/server didn't really do it, is ludicrous.

But, you liberals keep believing in republican conspiracies and UFOs and misuse your privilege to vote by voting for another radical, criminal in this case. Also a liar and a thief, as well as a tax fraud.
ALL the D and R politicians are liars, thieves, and tax evaders.
  #33  
Old 05-29-2016, 05:56 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
ALL the D and R politicians are liars, thieves, and tax evaders.
And you probably are also. If you are going to generalize, don't forget to be inclusive.
  #34  
Old 05-29-2016, 06:45 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

With party control of 99% of ALL fed gov. Agencies the cover up and systematic erasing of electronic trail has be going on for couple years. This happened first with clintons and her AIDS having 9 months or more to erase files from the server probably with help from the server.

This IMO why she when around fed gov. Secure record keeping sites securing her business from history record keeping and have the ability to remove it.

As far as Obama link? This has been erased the first 9 months before she had to turn over her server for hearings. Any other business or agency under suspension information would of been seized immediately. Not giving the suspected criminal 9 months to doctor or easy files.

Now, this next guestions are will the democratic controlled federal agencies have guts to go after there next head pulpit? IMO I doubt it, that's why it's being dragged out to hide and cover up the evidence. Department heads will be sacrificed as before with no crimes charged and will probably be promoted!
  #35  
Old 05-29-2016, 08:09 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
And you probably are also. If you are going to generalize, don't forget to be inclusive.
No, and I'm also not trying to control people and take their money.
  #36  
Old 05-29-2016, 10:42 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
ALL the D and R politicians are liars, thieves, and tax evaders.
Progressive Handbook Rule Number 3 :

When the debate becomes too close to the truth then generalize and change the argument .
  #37  
Old 05-29-2016, 11:06 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Progressive Handbook Rule Number 3 :

When the debate becomes too close to the truth then generalize and change the argument .
"Not all progressives are liberal

Progressivism is a problem-solving method. Historians generally date Progressive Era as 1890-1920, but the progressive method did not end with that date. The progressive method is not an ideology but a pragmatic search for solutions that work, grounded in a healthy skepticism. Thus, for example, Prohibition was a progressive project and was based on the social science of that era, but “The Great Experiment” of Prohibition failed in practice and progressives also worked for its repeal. The 20th century can reasonably be summarized as the rise and spread of the progressive method."

would you agree?
  #38  
Old 05-29-2016, 11:17 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
A reporter is not a subject matter expert. A liberal rag is not credible to give an unbiased opinion.

NO MALICE is required to have broken the law. But, she did have intent as evidence is in her emails to her minions, instructing them to remover classification marking before sending them to her. Even then, intent would not be necessary. The fact that classified information was removed from a secure network and distributed via a non-secure network is evidence of a broken law.

WP suggests that a hacker that plead guilty of hacking into her system/server didn't really do it, is ludicrous.

But, you liberals keep believing in republican conspiracies and UFOs and misuse your privilege to vote by voting for another radical, criminal in this case. Also a liar and a thief, as well as a tax fraud.
off topic but you have the expertise

How did Snowden have access to top secrets? As a system admin? Are there thousands of system admins working as contractors? Is the security on par with 2015 technology or more like 2000 technology?
  #39  
Old 05-29-2016, 12:05 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
"Not all progressives are liberal

Progressivism is a problem-solving method. Historians generally date Progressive Era as 1890-1920, but the progressive method did not end with that date. The progressive method is not an ideology but a pragmatic search for solutions that work, grounded in a healthy skepticism. Thus, for example, Prohibition was a progressive project and was based on the social science of that era, but “The Great Experiment” of Prohibition failed in practice and progressives also worked for its repeal. The 20th century can reasonably be summarized as the rise and spread of the progressive method."

would you agree?
President Wilson a former college professor at Princeton was an enthusiastic " Progressive ". And as were many Progressives in his day he was a strong proponent of " Human Eugenics " a philosophy and junk science which held that most races were inferior to the Caucasian Race .

His followers and supporters embraced him and his belief system just as firmly and blindly as those who are promoting Hillary do today .
  #40  
Old 05-29-2016, 12:20 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
President Wilson a former college professor at Princeton was an enthusiastic " Progressive ". And as were many Progressives in his day he was a strong proponent of " Human Eugenics " a philosophy and junk science which held that most races were inferior to the Caucasian Race .

His followers and supporters embraced him and his belief system just as firmly and blindly as those who are promoting Hillary do today .
Today, self-styled progressives are wont, with considerable abandon, to label as racists those who object to their attempts at social engineering. They would do well to rein in their rhetorical excesses and curb their enthusiasm for the administrative state — for the Progressives of yesteryear, on whom they model themselves, really were racists in the precise and proper sense of the term, and in formulating public policy they were true to their principles.

Read more at: | National Review

The labels people put on others are so confusing and misleading. Why bother at all?
  #41  
Old 05-29-2016, 12:44 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

" Why bother at all " --- They use the tactic because sadly it has been successful for them time and time again .

It is very ironic that all of the issues which the " Progressives " rail against today and falsely accuse the Conservatives of promoting were ideas conceived and promoted in former times by tier own Party and it`s leaders .
  #42  
Old 05-29-2016, 01:04 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
" Why bother at all " --- They use the tactic because sadly it has been successful for them time and time again .

It is very ironic that all of the issues which the " Progressives " rail against today and falsely accuse the Conservatives of promoting were ideas conceived and promoted in former times by tier own Party and it`s leaders .
Maybe a better question is why are people willing to be labeled? My guess is they don't really know what the label means. Or maybe it's too much trouble to start every post with a disclaimer.
  #43  
Old 05-29-2016, 01:57 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
off topic but you have the expertise

How did Snowden have access to top secrets? As a system admin? Are there thousands of system admins working as contractors? Is the security on par with 2015 technology or more like 2000 technology?
Snowden was a contractor working for the government and had access to classified information. Yes, we have thousands of civilian contractors working for the Gov. They asked me to come back as a working "consultant" but I declined because I enjoyed traveling with my family and as a contractor, my wife would not be traveling with me. Especially, to some of the less than desirable countries I would be working in.

Classified information is ALWAYS stored in secured locations, in safes/vaults or on secured and encrypted electronic media, such as a closed and encrypted computer network. It can never/NEVER be mingled accidentally on an open system such as the Internet because it is a totally different system. The only way that anyone could transmit classified information via an email account on the Internet is if it was purposely moved from one location to another and installed onto the open network. If classified information is discussed on an open network, then that is also a violation, because it is still classified whether marked as such or not. Only the originator is allowed to give declassification instructions. Destruction of classified material must be documented and witnessed. I am paraphrasing and not giving exact quotes of the regulations/laws pertaining to the handling of classified.
  #44  
Old 05-29-2016, 05:54 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Snowden was a contractor working for the government and had access to classified information. Yes, we have thousands of civilian contractors working for the Gov. They asked me to come back as a working "consultant" but I declined because I enjoyed traveling with my family and as a contractor, my wife would not be traveling with me. Especially, to some of the less than desirable countries I would be working in.

Classified information is ALWAYS stored in secured locations, in safes/vaults or on secured and encrypted electronic media, such as a closed and encrypted computer network. It can never/NEVER be mingled accidentally on an open system such as the Internet because it is a totally different system. The only way that anyone could transmit classified information via an email account on the Internet is if it was purposely moved from one location to another and installed onto the open network. If classified information is discussed on an open network, then that is also a violation, because it is still classified whether marked as such or not. Only the originator is allowed to give declassification instructions. Destruction of classified material must be documented and witnessed. I am paraphrasing and not giving exact quotes of the regulations/laws pertaining to the handling of classified.
Here's a geeky way of explaining it. How Unsafe Was Hillary Clinton's Secret Staff Email System?
  #45  
Old 05-29-2016, 06:18 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Hillary Clinton failed to report several hacking attempts: IG - Washington Times

"The 83-page report, obtained by The Washington Times, is devastating in its evaluation of Mrs. Clinton’s behavior, saying it can find no record of her getting approval from either security or legal staffers for her unique arrangement. The report also undercuts many of her campaign’s explanations for her use of the system, dismisses comparisons to her predecessors’ email use, and points to repeated hacking attempts that she failed to report."

Can't wait to see the FBI investigation report. Of course, I am not living under the delusion that the AG will prosecute. Obama's AG.
The Washington Times??? You've got to be kidding. The WT was founded by Moonies back in the 80's and is the standard conservative bias propaganda machine that Republicans depend on. Factual, no.
 

Tags
report, failed, repeated, points, hacking


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.