Mr. Rubicon - any reply regarding your segregationist post being racist or not?

Originally Posted by Guest

"Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
In other words, ANY reaction by a white person is wrong. Argumentation? The real problem with white society/culture, is that black culture (as a whole) realizes they can't compete on the great grounds of civilization against white people. They are a jealous, bitter, envious race/culture that is constantly using violence to try and get what they want and cannot achieve with brains and patience. White people do not wake up in the morning and wonder "Hmmm, just what can I do to screw up black people today?" It's more of "How can I avoid areas where these dangerous bitter fools will be today?""




What does that have to do with the truth? HE isn't making them act the way they do. HE isn't goading them on...encouraging their bad behavior.

Do you have a problem with WHAT he said? Anything untrue?

I think it's YOU who have a problem...it's called delusion...failure to see the truth in something obvious.

The OT seemed to be fine with slavery...and Jesus never mentions black people.

I asked a question, is he to ashamed to answer?

Originally Posted by Guest

I would ask you if you considered yourself a Christian, but you already stated that you are not. But, you certainly want to hold conservatives to Christian standards. Do you hold all orientals to Buddhist standards? By the way, do you realize that you have asked a Jew if they considered himself a Christian, in the past? I bet he was laughing his *** off.

I'm not holding them to different standards, they should read their bible. Going to church, just means you show yourself as a hypocrite when you do not obey your bible.

Originally Posted by Guest

Look at the Supreme Court decision of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and you see the phrase of "separate but equal" in determining that separate facilities were fine and not discriminating.

However, that was overturned in 1954 with Brown v. Board of Education that separate facilities did in fact discriminate against a group of people.

So, the answer to your question is YES. What do you say and back up your reply with fact please.

The announcement that California State University, Los Angeles agreed to the demands of black student groups at the school to establish separate dorm housing for blacks ignited the predictable furor.

The critics say it’s wrong, dangerous and sends the horrible message that segregation is OK and, even more appalling, paid for at a California public university on the taxpayer dime. After all, this is 2016, liberal California and not 1956 segregated Jackson, Mississippi. The backers of separate housing say it’s much ado about nothing since other campuses have “themed housing.” That’s the chic euphemism for separate housing and space for black, Hispanic, and other minority students. And besides, so the argument goes, separate housing can be a good, even a necessary thing, to give black students a safe culturally comfortable environment and reinforcing environment to live and learn in.
Huffington Post 09/08/2016.

Many religious sects separate themselves from mainstream society based on their religious belief not racism.

Even today we have a number of schools which are all boy or all girl schools, again nothing attached to racism.

Recollection fails me but there is an African nation began by American blacks to separate themselves from whites.

Darwinian's invoke his theories of evolution to explain the eventual creation of man vis a vis intelligent Design. Yet we find that evolution sought fit to evolve black, white, yellow and red races. And we know now that the DNA of each race is different. So under evolution can equality exist? Does it even come into play?

Those who lean to Intelligent Design, like me, believe God created all people to be equal. However it doesn't make me a racist if I prefer to marry a Caucasian or live exclusively among them any more than those black colleges students who want separate dorms or those American blacks that settled into their African nation or Orthodox Jews who live in a community.

Succinctly stated the term"racist" is reserved for progressives only and for their exclusive use. the problem with progressives is they live a dichotomy, either you agree with them or your wrong.

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

The announcement that California State University, Los Angeles agreed to the demands of black student groups at the school to establish separate dorm housing for blacks ignited the predictable furor.

The critics say it’s wrong, dangerous and sends the horrible message that segregation is OK and, even more appalling, paid for at a California public university on the taxpayer dime. After all, this is 2016, liberal California and not 1956 segregated Jackson, Mississippi. The backers of separate housing say it’s much ado about nothing since other campuses have “themed housing.” That’s the chic euphemism for separate housing and space for black, Hispanic, and other minority students. And besides, so the argument goes, separate housing can be a good, even a necessary thing, to give black students a safe culturally comfortable environment and reinforcing environment to live and learn in.
Huffington Post 09/08/2016.

Many religious sects separate themselves from mainstream society based on their religious belief not racism.

Even today we have a number of schools which are all boy or all girl schools, again nothing attached to racism.

Recollection fails me but there is an African nation began by American blacks to separate themselves from whites.

Darwinian's invoke his theories of evolution to explain the eventual creation of man vis a vis intelligent Design. Yet we find that evolution sought fit to evolve black, white, yellow and red races. And we know now that the DNA of each race is different. So under evolution can equality exist? Does it even come into play?

Those who lean to Intelligent Design, like me, believe God created all people to be equal. However it doesn't make me a racist if I prefer to marry a Caucasian or live exclusively among them any more than those black colleges students who want separate dorms or those American blacks that settled into their African nation or Orthodox Jews who live in a community.

Succinctly stated the term"racist" is reserved for progressives only and for their exclusive use. the problem with progressives is they live a dichotomy, either you agree with them or your wrong.

Personal Best Regards:

regarding this in your post...

"Recollection fails me but there is an African nation began by American blacks to separate themselves from whites."

LIBERIA....basically founded by American Colonization Society, a group of an overwhelming majority of white men, who felt that free blacks could not be integrated into white America.

American Colonization Society (1816-1964) | The Black Past: Remembered and Reclaimed

Liberia - Wikipedia

Originally Posted by Guest

I asked a question, is he to ashamed to answer?

If you are alluding to Me see I consider Myself a fisherman... Post #24

Originally Posted by RubiTHECon

Succinctly stated...

Yeah, like you've EVER been 'succinct?'

Originally Posted by RubiTHECon

... the term"racist" is reserved for progressives only and for their exclusive use. the problem with progressives is they live a dichotomy, either you agree with them or your wrong.

Personal Best Regards:

As usual...you're wrong.

And your whole diatribe is simply meant to obfuscate, your now out in the open...obvious racism.

Yes, Virginia, racism DOES exist (especially the insidious, vulgar and heretofore hidden type)...and you keep proving it.

So thanks for that.



Deepest Sincere Wishes:

Originally Posted by Guest

I'm not holding them to different standards, they should read their bible. Going to church, just means you show yourself as a hypocrite when you do not obey your bible.

You're a hypocrite and you don't read the Bible, so what makes you qualified to judge someone else? Get over yourself and discuss the issues or go find somewhere else to play. Or is current events too deep for you?

I'm glad for My **** stirring abilities..

Originally Posted by Guest

"Racism rests on two basic assumptions: that a correlation exists between physical characteristics and moral qualities; that mankind is divisible into superior and inferior stocks. Racism, thus defined, is a modern conception, for prior to the XVIth century there was virtually nothing in the life and thought of the West that can be described as racist. To prevent misunderstanding a clear distinction must be made between racism and ethnocentrism ... The Ancient Hebrews, in referring to all who were not Hebrews as Gentiles, were indulging in ethnocentrism, not in racism. ... So it was with the Hellenes who denominated all non-Hellenes—whether the wild Scythians or the Egyptians whom they acknowledged as their mentors in the arts of civilization—Barbarians, the term denoting that which was strange or foreign."

"Mankind"...is white people. There are different SPECIES...not races.

ALL classifications are a "modern conception. That's WHEN they started classifying. Most white people had never seen a negroid prior to the 1600s.

A clear distinction needs to be made between the different Homo species. We're just killing ourselves with our futile attempts to "mainstream" them. They've all been failures.

The correct term is Goyum, Goy...the non-semites are beneath them. Is it not "species" too? They're related through the mother, They all look alike to me, they might be from similar genetic stock differentiationable from other groups of people. There just may be enough differentiation to be classified as another species too.

The term "barbarian" comes from the sound of their speech, it started as the Romans mocking the way they talk.

" The word barbarian was used originally by the Greeks to refer to any non-Greek: Egyptians, Persians, Indians, Celts, Germans, Phoenicians, Etruscans, Macedonians, Carthaginians, Vikings, Goths – all of these became known as barbarians. The ancient Greek word βάρβαρος (bárbaros) meant “babbler.” To the Greek ear, someone who did not speak the Greek language babbled, producing the onomatopoeic sound “bar bar bar” which became bárbaros, and later barbaria in Latin."

Originally Posted by Guest

Now a question for the group. Are segregationist racist?

Personal Best Regards:

No...they want to separate species.

Originally Posted by Guest

Look at the Supreme Court decision of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and you see the phrase of "separate but equal" in determining that separate facilities were fine and not discriminating.

However, that was overturned in 1954 with Brown v. Board of Education that separate facilities did in fact discriminate against a group of people.

So, the answer to your question is YES. What do you say and back up your reply with fact please.

Yes they discriminated...because they KNEW trying to "educate" blacks is a waste of time and resources. How far have we gotten? BLACK majority schools are violent and dangerous hell holes where NOBODY would send their kids. It IS a waste of time and money trying to "equalize" them. Look how far the standards have HAD to fall for "no child left behind"...WE mock how bad the education system has gotten.

Originally Posted by Guest

I asked a question, is he to ashamed to answer?

You made this up...you took two separate posts and put them together to appear as one. Why would someone do that?

Originally Posted by Guest

I'm not holding them to different standards, they should read their bible. Going to church, just means you show yourself as a hypocrite when you do not obey your bible.

Obey the Bible? You know...that includes the OT...you don't get off easy. You could eliminate 95% of "Christians" if you enforced ALL the "rules". What makes Christianity so popular is...it's the only one where you can be forgiven for not following all the rules. Embrace Jesus...easy to do during emotional times...and you're in.

Originally Posted by Guest

The announcement that California State University, Los Angeles agreed to the demands of black student groups at the school to establish separate dorm housing for blacks ignited the predictable furor.

The critics say it’s wrong, dangerous and sends the horrible message that segregation is OK and, even more appalling, paid for at a California public university on the taxpayer dime. After all, this is 2016, liberal California and not 1956 segregated Jackson, Mississippi. The backers of separate housing say it’s much ado about nothing since other campuses have “themed housing.” That’s the chic euphemism for separate housing and space for black, Hispanic, and other minority students. And besides, so the argument goes, separate housing can be a good, even a necessary thing, to give black students a safe culturally comfortable environment and reinforcing environment to live and learn in.
Huffington Post 09/08/2016.

Many religious sects separate themselves from mainstream society based on their religious belief not racism.

Even today we have a number of schools which are all boy or all girl schools, again nothing attached to racism.

Recollection fails me but there is an African nation began by American blacks to separate themselves from whites.

Darwinian's invoke his theories of evolution to explain the eventual creation of man vis a vis intelligent Design. Yet we find that evolution sought fit to evolve black, white, yellow and red races. And we know now that the DNA of each race is different. So under evolution can equality exist? Does it even come into play?

Those who lean to Intelligent Design, like me, believe God created all people to be equal. However it doesn't make me a racist if I prefer to marry a Caucasian or live exclusively among them any more than those black colleges students who want separate dorms or those American blacks that settled into their African nation or Orthodox Jews who live in a community.

Succinctly stated the term"racist" is reserved for progressives only and for their exclusive use. the problem with progressives is they live a dichotomy, either you agree with them or your wrong.

Personal Best Regards:

It can't happen soon enough...AND it's the future IF we don't stop the minority majority sweeping through right now. WE will become the social underclass.

Segregation is NECESSARY. We will NEVER live together as equals.

A place they can be safe and secure...living their delusions of equality. They want "their safe space" so they're not constantly reminded just how inferior they are.

Zoos separate the different species...why not us?

TELL me about the "all black" schools and how they compare to the "all boy, all girl" schools...go ahead...I DARE you. THEY ARE NOT US.

Evolution MADE different SPECIES...like Darwin's finches. Each with different abilities.

No...equality cannot exist. Is there equality between a cat and a dog? WE ARE DIFFERENT SPECIES.

"People" is the key word...They are not us.

Unfortunately...NOBODY wants to live with blacks...so they ALWAYS end up alone, in poverty, in isolation...because they're NOT us. Blacks don't get along with ANYONE...

Originally Posted by Guest

regarding this in your post...

"Recollection fails me but there is an African nation began by American blacks to separate themselves from whites."

LIBERIA....basically founded by American Colonization Society, a group of an overwhelming majority of white men, who felt that free blacks could not be integrated into white America.

American Colonization Society (1816-1964) | The Black Past: Remembered and Reclaimed

Liberia - Wikipedia

And they were RIGHT...blacks cannot as a people integrate into our modern society. They were completely correct.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yeah, like you've EVER been 'succinct?'





As usual...you're wrong.

And your whole diatribe is simply meant to obfuscate, your now out in the open...obvious racism.

Yes, Virginia, racism DOES exist (especially the insidious, vulgar and heretofore hidden type)...and you keep proving it.

So thanks for that.



Deepest Sincere Wishes:

You are right about this poster. He had hidden his racism but it has now surfaced. Very ugly. Well, he has no intelligentsia backing him. Obviously, Don Baldwin and Larbud are dumb as a box of lint.

Just a shame that we have people like them in The Villages. Fortunately, they are just a tiny fraction of The Villages population.

Originally Posted by Sandtrap328

You are right about this poster. He had hidden his racism but it has now surfaced. Very ugly. Well, he has no intelligentsia backing him. Obviously, Don Baldwin and Larbud are dumb as a box of lint.



Just a shame that we have people like them in The Villages. Fortunately, they are just a tiny fraction of The Villages population.

Judging by the many Trump stickers on golf carts here, I would dispute what you just stated. At least Don has the gonads to wear his thoughts on his sleeve. He says what he means and means what he says. I'll take his form of racism any day over a country club republican.

Wow all these arrows launched at me and not one of these posters addressed my comments.

Here is the fundamental difference between conservatives and progressives.

Conservatives adhere to the wording of the US Constitution and through it with added Amendments have
set the standards that all men are created equal and that all rights come from GOD. we believe in the rule of law
Whereas
progressives desire to change the constitution to fit their ideology. The federal government and the Supreme court to legislate from the bench attempting to dominate people and people's thoughts and beliefs. Its suffocating but to progressives its a trade off for they get safe spaces.

In essence they prefer the rule of man vis a vis the rule of law. But the fallacy of their approach is lost on them
because they operate in a collective.

They abhor individual thinkers because they have been inbred to believe that government should rule them.
they fall into that trap.

and governments control people by creating division and chaos. so that if one desires a cogent debate on race s/he is a racist because individual thought and free speech are no longer allowed.

You witnessed it here on these pages. Just because I raised the debate of "Is a separatist a racist" all the progressive yelled back rubicon is a racist. Not one progressive desired to enter into cogent debate on the question. Progressive predictably are reactive and very emotional and that's their argument name calling

Interesting indeed.

personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

regarding this in your post...

"Recollection fails me but there is an African nation began by American blacks to separate themselves from whites."

LIBERIA....basically founded by American Colonization Society, a group of an overwhelming majority of white men, who felt that free blacks could not be integrated into white America.

American Colonization Society (1816-1964) | The Black Past: Remembered and Reclaimed

Liberia - Wikipedia

Dear Guest: Thank you for that reply. I was not aware of the entire history of this nation.

My reading of what you referenced is that a number of prominent white men early on recognized the folly of slavery and the civil unrest it was causing and made a good faith decision to return blacks back to their nation country.

The reading pertaining to Charles Taylor convicted of war crimes help my recollection of this nation

We could spent several hours on conversing about Liberia.

bottom line slavery was wrong and this nation moved to make a course correction a number of times and that fact shouldn't be left out in any discussion on this topic. thanks again for the help

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by RubiTHECon

Wow all these arrows launched at me and not one of these posters addressed my comments.

Here is the fundamental difference between conservatives and progressives.

Conservatives adhere to the wording of the US Constitution and through it with added Amendments have
set the standards that all men are created equal and that all rights come from GOD. we believe in the rule of law
Whereas
progressives desire to change the constitution to fit their ideology. The federal government and the Supreme court to legislate from the bench attempting to dominate people and people's thoughts and beliefs. Its suffocating but to progressives its a trade off for they get safe spaces.

In essence they prefer the rule of man vis a vis the rule of law. But the fallacy of their approach is lost on them
because they operate in a collective.

They abhor individual thinkers because they have been inbred to believe that government should rule them.
they fall into that trap.

and governments control people by creating division and chaos. so that if one desires a cogent debate on race s/he is a racist because individual thought and free speech are no longer allowed.

You witnessed it here on these pages. Just because I raised the debate of "Is a separatist a racist" all the progressive yelled back rubicon is a racist. Not one progressive desired to enter into cogent debate on the question. Progressive predictably are reactive and very emotional and that's their argument name calling

Interesting indeed.

personal Best Regards:

You are so dumb...it's sometimes painful to watch.

An entire diatribe that is not only false, but that you aren't even smart enough to realize...that your question was answered many times over.

Of course segregation is racist...you vacuous twit.

That you spent so much time writing a diatribe of your opinions, then once again actually try to convince intelligent people that it is 'fact'...simply further exposes your ignorance.

So at least...thanks for that.


Deepest Sincere Wishes: