She needs a haircut, a makeover and a trip to Barney's. Her husband should stop dressing like a scarecrow.

This thread is little more than chum on the water....and about as much sense.

She is a dolt, and a pathetic laughing stock. I agree, we have better things to spend our time on.

Sorry, but I feel that God has a lot more authority here than 5 non-elected judges. They just don't mean much to me. I will stand behind her as well as lots of other US Citizens.

Funny how the Dems threw her to the wolves, just because she mentioned "God." That should prove something to you. Typical of liberals to be against religion. Any other time (ie., Hilary) they would be making outrageous excuses for her.

n

Originally Posted by Guest

Sorry, but I feel that God has a lot more authority here than 5 non-elected judges. They just don't mean much to me. I will stand behind her as well as lots of other US Citizens.

When the Supreme Court justices decide for the conservative viewpoints, you agree that they should be followed, I presume.

Originally Posted by Guest

On the other hand, liberals want to protect Hilary, who is a felon and no doubt a felon that just hasn't been convicted yet. There are felony laws for what she did. She deserves to go to jail for a very long time, but liberals think national security is a lark and not to be taken seriously.
.

Hey, get back to the other 6 dwarfs, Dopey!

Hillary has not been arrained in court, not been tried, not been found guilty (except by Faux News stooges) so she cannot be a felon.

You, on the other hand, have been found not guilty by reason of insanity!

Originally Posted by Guest

Hey, get back to the other 6 dwarfs, Dopey!

Hillary has not been arrained in court, not been tried, not been found guilty (except by Faux News stooges) so she cannot be a felon.

You, on the other hand, have been found not guilty by reason of insanity!

That hickamajig at the end always does it for me.

Just a sucker for intellectuals.

Originally Posted by Guest

Hey, get back to the other 6 dwarfs, Dopey!

Hillary has not been arrained in court, not been tried, not been found guilty (except by Faux News stooges) so she cannot be a felon.

You, on the other hand, have been found not guilty by reason of insanity!

She is clearly a felon, just not a convicted felon as you imply.

Her emails being plastered all over the internet must be a Republican conspiracy and couldn't be her's. From what I have read of those emails, she is easily a felon, just not convicted yet. And knowing the CLintons, she won't be convicted of a felony. Just because a person is not convicted, does not make then innocent. And idiots that voted for Obama will probably be stupid enough to elect Hilary too. She has no regard for national security and most liberals I know could care less also. After all , they live in their little purple haze Obama Utopia and are oblivious to the real world.

Originally Posted by Guest

This RIGHT has been long fought for the LGBT community and even when upheld by the highest court in the land, this disrespectful jerk says NO! She has no business working in a public office sworn to defend all the rights of all the people of this great nation. When you refuse to follow the laws of this country, you give up your right to represent any of the law abiding US citizens. PUT HER BEHIND BARS with the rest off he criminals.

Fags on the Supreme Court should not have been able to rule " conflict of personnel interest" just like the fag that over turned Cala voters in the I think 9th district court. Nobody should be able to over rule the citizens votes.

Originally Posted by Guest

This RIGHT has been long fought for the LGBT community and even when upheld by the highest court in the land, this disrespectful jerk says NO! She has no business working in a public office sworn to defend all the rights of all the people of this great nation. When you refuse to follow the laws of this country, you give up your right to represent any of the law abiding US citizens. PUT HER BEHIND BARS with the rest off he criminals.

Dear Guest: What right are you addressing? It can't be marriage because the homosexual community has had that right for a very long time. It can't be survivorship issues because those legal issues have been available for a very long time.

The highest court in the land a) had no right to make a decision on this issue as it should have been left to each state to decide b) in making its decision it placed politic ahead of facts and voted based on judicial activism c) made law were none was ever intended based on the anticipated reaction by the the majority of people who did not want the definition of marriage

As to Kim Davis' reaction first let me state I am not interested in defending any person but rather the issue itself.

The law of the land based on Dredd Scott and other property laws for hundreds of years was that slavery was right and slaves were property and in fact so were women. So you agree that all those acts of disobedience marches riots etc were illegal and those laws should have continued on the books?

Were those people who disagree with the Supreme Courts decision also wrong in their protest?

Now whether you agree or disagree so far please explain why Muslim are allowed all their rights to exercise their beliefs and not Christian. Why is a person can make a religious claim of non-killing conscious objector and escape military service for so many years prior to the all volunteer military.

Explain why its a right to legalize drug use but not a right to legally own firearms?

Should we count the ways in which a conservative point of view is non-existent and in educational institutions and in fact if a conservative student attempt to exercise his/her beliefs they are intimated with the threats of failing grades.

Why on college campuses are males presumed guilty of rape and denied their due process?

Finally you claim a great believe in the laws of this nation and demand criminals be sent to jail so shouldn't those Planned Parenthood participants guilty of the unborn slaughter and selling of baby parts be given their just punishment ? If found guilty if breaches and accepting illegal contributions, etc shouldn't Hillary Clinton go to jail? Is it only Christians who practice their faith go to jail. Heck I bet you believe Kim Davis ought to be fed to the lions

Personal Best Regards:

IMO this should of been nation vote and not decided by any district or Supreme Court. If the majority wants it then that will be the law which can't be over turned. That way you keep special and personal interest out of it. This is what you get when few decide for the majority.

Originally Posted by Guest

IMO this should of been nation vote and not decided by any district or Supreme Court. If the majority wants it then that will be the law which can't be over turned. That way you keep special and personal interest out of it. This is what you get when few decide for the majority.

And you are definitely entitled to your opinion. However, according to the Constitution, that is not how it is done in the USA. The constiutionality of the law of the land is decided by the Supreme Court.

Originally Posted by Guest

And you are definitely entitled to your opinion. However, according to the Constitution, that is not how it is done in the USA. The constiutionality of the law of the land is decided by the Supreme Court.

You can have your civil union. That's what a court house marriage is. But, real marriage is blessed by God and he ain't gonna bless gay marriage. God's word, the Bible will tell you that. Gays might even get a radical church preacher to marry them, but it won't mean anything. You can force law, but you can't force God's endorsement, no matter how you try to convince normal people that deviant actions are normal. It has nothing to do with equal rights, and minorities should be offended that they are grouped in with deviant abnormal behavior, when it comes to civil rights progress. The Supreme in Supreme Court does not make them supreme to the Lord, and America is going to find that out real fast.