Originally Posted by Guest

This forum is primarily a bash Obama site. Where you started your so called unbias question with the word liberal it kind of sets the tone, don't you think. Believe me there are some of us whom are conservative and think Bush 43 did much more damage to this economy than Obama but understand he had a lot of help. So I guess we agree the economy was toast before Obama got it and there is really not much he can do.

1. If you read the OP I typed that I was challenged to begin a thread that had no intent to bash Obama and that was the intent. It was about as neutral as you can get. The question I asked DID NOT contain the word liberal. Here it is once again..."Why do voters put so much stock in economic performance when economists say the President does not affect it ?"


2. I will give you guys credit for twisting anything to protect St. Obama. This is not the first thread that has been twisted this way. I am not accusing you because not sure who you are however I think I know but not for sure. You are one of the group who thinks everything is for fun and games. So enjoy your selfs and keep PMing between you all giggling like little girls.

Originally Posted by Guest

1. If you read the OP I typed that I was challenged to begin a thread that had no intent to bash Obama and that was the intent. It was about as neutral as you can get. The question I asked DID NOT contain the word liberal. Here it is once again..."Why do voters put so much stock in economic performance when economists say the President does not affect it ?"


2. I will give you guys credit for twisting anything to protect St. Obama. This is not the first thread that has been twisted this way. I am not accusing you because not sure who you are however I think I know but not for sure. You are one of the group who thinks everything is for fun and games. So enjoy your selfs and keep PMing between you all giggling like little girls.

Priceless! This thread was dead in the water until my post 2. That has been my only post in this thread. You asked your conservative friends to try and do the impossible not attack liberal posters in this thread. How long did that last?

What did I twist? How the hell is it a twist, when I have posted the same thing the article you referenced is stating, and did it a long time before the article was written? When I said it, I am protecting St. Obama. Well, the devil is a saint too. When are you going to stop attacking the devil, Obama?

What did I tell you about underlining? You can have a long post, and people here will pick out one line in the post, underline it, and attack it. Didn't you see that happen here?

When are you people here going to get it through your thick skulls, I am a moderate independent? No one but no one here will state why my choice for president, John Kasich, is unacceptable as the Republican candidate for president.

Why don't you answer your own question about the reason people put so much stock in changing the party running the government during recessions? Do you think that the opposing party is going to let the condition of the economy slide in its campaign ads? Of course, they are not. Negative ads ,and the blame game is the name of the beast in presidential campaigns, and has been that way for a long time.

If you want people here to lose their attitude, and not fire cheap shots at each other, maybe you should set an that example. There are no saints on this board only sinners. Open your eyes, and look at the threads on this board. You want to kill the liberals/moderates on this board say something good about Obama. Your fingers would probably fall off your hands typing that message.

Originally Posted by Guest

Priceless! This thread was dead in the water until my post 2. That has been my only post in this thread. You asked your conservative friends to try and do the impossible not attack liberal posters in this thread. How long did that last?

What did I twist? How the hell is it a twist, when I have posted the same thing the article you referenced is stating, and did it a long time before the article was written? When I said it, I am protecting St. Obama. Well, the devil is a saint too. When are you going to stop attacking the devil, Obama?

What did I tell you about underlining? You can have a long post, and people here will pick out one line in the post, underline it, and attack it. Didn't you see that happen here?

When are you people here going to get it through your thick skulls, I am a moderate independent? No one but no one here will state why my choice for president, John Kasich, is unacceptable as the Republican candidate for president.

Why don't you answer your own question about the reason people put so much stock in changing the party running the government during recessions? Do you think that the opposing party is going to let the condition of the economy slide in its campaign ads? Of course, they are not. Negative ads ,and the blame game is the name of the beast in presidential campaigns, and has been that way for a long time.

If you want people here to lose their attitude, and not fire cheap shots at each other, maybe you should set an that example. There are no saints on this board only sinners. Open your eyes, and look at the threads on this board. You want to kill the liberals/moderates on this board say something good about Obama. Your fingers would probably fall off your hands typing that message.

Please Joe..you never make sense..just leave.

You attack, defend Obama, and them blame everyone for being mean to you.

Do you REALLY think that much of yourself ?

Originally Posted by Guest

This forum is primarily a bash Obama site. Where you started your so called unbias question with the word liberal it kind of sets the tone, don't you think. Believe me there are some of us whom are conservative and think Bush 43 did much more damage to this economy than Obama but understand he had a lot of help. So I guess we agree the economy was toast before Obama got it and there is really not much he can do.

You got that right. Obama hasn't shown he can do anything. He is the most inept president yet. Gotta love you liberals' persistence though. As long as you have Bush to blame, Obama can play more golf.

Originally Posted by Guest

Please Joe..you never make sense..just leave.

You attack, defend Obama, and them blame everyone for being mean to you.

Do you REALLY think that much of yourself ?

Defending Obama is fine. If he just left the "poor me" attitude at home and stopped directly attacking other posters and just stick to the subjects.

Originally Posted by Guest

Defending Obama is fine. If he just left the "poor me" attitude at home and stopped directly attacking other posters and just stick to the subjects.

Well, an attack on Obama is an attack on a liberal. After all, with their egos, do they really want to admit that they voted for an inept loser, not once but twice?

Originally Posted by Guest

Well, an attack on Obama is an attack on a liberal. After all, with their egos, do they really want to admit that they voted for an inept loser, not once but twice?

You make it sound as though President Obama lost two elections. No, it was the Republicans who voted for inept losers not once, but two times in a row!

My broker says past performance is no guarantee of future performance, but I do cut back my exposure in stocks during a republican administration.

Originally Posted by Guest

My broker says past performance is no guarantee of future performance, but I do cut back my exposure in stocks during a republican administration.

If BS was music you would be a brass band!

Originally Posted by Guest

You make it sound as though President Obama lost two elections. No, it was the Republicans who voted for inept losers not once, but two times in a row!

We've seen two terms of your inept loser. Republicans did not win the election so we don't know if they were going to be inept or not. You elected an entertainer instead of a president. He may be able to entertain you but he has yet to prove he can be presidential. Losing the election did not make them inept. But, he has proven he is inept. Some people are just not prepared, experienced or have the leadership enough to do the job. He is an example.

His impact on economics? He has had plenty of help in Reid and Pelosi, as well as his czars. He has attempted to hose up our economy but even though it has been the slowest rebound in history, he has yet to totally destroy it. Thank goodness for the rich that kept it going in spite of Obama and his cronies.

Originally Posted by Guest

We've seen two terms of your inept loser. Republicans did not win the election so we don't know if they were going to be inept or not. You elected an entertainer instead of a president. He may be able to entertain you but he has yet to prove he can be presidential. Losing the election did not make them inept. But, he has proven he is inept. Some people are just not prepared, experienced or have the leadership enough to do the job. He is an example.

His impact on economics? He has had plenty of help in Reid and Pelosi, as well as his czars. He has attempted to hose up our economy but even though it has been the slowest rebound in history, he has yet to totally destroy it. Thank goodness for the rich that kept it going in spite of Obama and his cronies.

You didn't by chance read the articles in the first post in this thread. They were there in bold also, and repeated several times in other posts. The president has no effect on the economy. How can you destroy something when you have no effect on it?

We have elected a wannabe entertainer twice in Obama. I guess republicans really like entertainers as president. So, the leader in their race for the nomination is a real entertainer, Trump.

Originally Posted by Guest

Please Joe..you never make sense..just leave.

You attack, defend Obama, and them blame everyone for being mean to you.

Do you REALLY think that much of yourself ?

I have never not even once caste the first stone. I am pulling a Trump. Never fire the first shot, but go overboard in the response. The second part of that statement is wrong. So I am pulling a half Trump. People are being mean to me. Who talks like that other than five year old? In your world, the world of the five year olds, I should take my ball, and go home.

Maybe you should act like an adult. If I don't make sense, why don't you tell me why I don't make sense, or is that too much to ask?

Originally Posted by Guest

You didn't by chance read the articles in the first post in this thread. They were there in bold also, and repeated several times in other posts. The president has no effect on the economy. How can you destroy something when you have no effect on it?

We have elected a wannabe entertainer twice in Obama. I guess republicans really like entertainers as president. So, the leader in their race for the nomination is a real entertainer, Trump.

Sorry, but if you don't think this tyrant hasn't had detrimental effect on the economy, along with his cronies, then you can't blame Bush for the recession. That's simple enough.

If one does not think that Obama has had any effect on the economy, then they either believe he is incompetent or lazy and didn't do his job. Which is it?

Of course he has had an effect on the economy....

HE DAMPENS AND STIFLES any activity that results in capitalism progress and improvement.

And lest we not forget his impact on keeping the unemployed continuously paid for not working.....forever.

And the impressive, explosive growth in the number of people on food stamps.

Also his affordable care and the massive insurance premium increases that come along with it.

Change the definition of what constitutes unemployment.

Put 'em all in a bag a shake them up and out comes Obama's impact on the economy......more poverty.....more racism......increasing costs to live.....and of course more dependency on the government hand outs.

Yes....he certainly has had an effect.