Originally Posted by Guest

Go easy on cnm, was bullied and is fragile.

I believe the he/she is unhinged and may do something drastic like indulge in a chocolate binge. It does not take much to set her off on a tangent of adjectives. Of course, being a schizo, she-he doesn't remember calling names and insists that someone else is doing the name calling. Mentally challenged, yes. I think I would probably diagnose her as suffering from a Schizoaffective disorder.

Originally Posted by Guest

I believe the he/she is unhinged and may do something drastic like indulge in a chocolate binge. It does not take much to set her off on a tangent of adjectives. Of course, being a schizo, she-he doesn't remember calling names and insists that someone else is doing the name calling. Mentally challenged, yes. I think I would probably diagnose her as suffering from a Schizoaffective disorder.

Well God bless cnm, at least it's not advanced Parkinson's.

Originally Posted by Guest

Well God bless cnm, at least it's not advanced Parkinson's.

But she knows how to spell it and has stayed at a Holiday Inn Express.

Originally Posted by Guest

I certainly hope that you are not crushed when Trump wins by a landslide. Do you really think that anything that happens in a debate this late in the game will make a difference? How is Hillary going to get anyone to turn out to vote for her? Pay them? That's a possibility, considering Soros is her puppet master and quite rich.

Five Debate Moments that Changed Elections | The Fiscal Times

Originally Posted by Guest

Five Debate Moments that Changed Elections | The Fiscal Times

Democrats are NOT going to turn out to vote for Crooked Hitlery. There are some misinformed that might turn out, but at least a third are current on events and will not vote for a felon. The Clinton clan has one foot out the door, just waiting for a bit of a push.

You need to stop creating false rumors. All of my registered Democrat friends are voting for Hillary. I know many registered Republicans, including my husband, are voting for Hillary.

Originally Posted by Guest

You need to stop creating false rumors. All of my registered Democrat friends are voting for Hillary. I know many registered Republicans, including my husband, are voting for Hillary.

You really think your husband is voting for Hillary? Maybe he just doesn't want to hear you shriek!
http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/749563

Originally Posted by Guest

You need to stop creating false rumors. All of my registered Democrat friends are voting for Hillary. I know many registered Republicans, including my husband, are voting for Hillary.

He is absolutely voting for Hillary and a number of his friends. They do not like Trump.

Originally Posted by Guest

You need to stop creating false rumors. All of my registered Democrat friends are voting for Hillary. I know many registered Republicans, including my husband, are voting for Hillary.

And I want to add "all the brothers" I know will be voting for trump.

https://youtu.be/4jBxeZP6M8E

Originally Posted by Guest

You need to stop creating false rumors. All of my registered Democrat friends are voting for Hillary. I know many registered Republicans, including my husband, are voting for Hillary.

I have asked 12 family members (Democrats) and they said they will either vote for Trump or not vote at all. This isn't the DemocratIC party of my old dad.

Originally Posted by Guest

You need to stop creating false rumors. All of my registered Democrat friends are voting for Hillary. I know many registered Republicans, including my husband, are voting for Hillary.

BS. I bet your husband is a closet deplorable and just doesn't want to listen to you screech when he tells you that he is voting for Trump. Doesn't matter anyway. Hitlery will only get about a third of the libtard voters to turnout to vote. No real man will vote for crooked hitlery. Only a fool that doesn't care about law and order would vote for a felon.

"On Happening Now today, Jenna Lee discussed with Lichtman whether last night's debate or future debates can influence the prediction.

Lichtman emphasized that for the first time in more than 30 years, he's "hedging" his prediction because Trump - as he showed in last night's debate - could prove to be a "history-shattering candidate."

"[Trump] could change patterns that have held since 1860 in this country and enabled me to correctly predict every election since 1984," he explained.

The professor pointed out that Trump is the only candidate in decades who has refused to release his tax returns and appears to "lack the basic knowledge and temperament to be commander-in-chief."

"We have two competing historical forces. On one hand, this should be a change election. We should get a Republican president. But on the other hand, we have a candidate who could shatter patterns of history because of his unique status, which we saw on display last night."

Professor Predicting Trump Win, But Could Debate Change That? | Fox News Insider

Look all of you " Deplorables " , when are you going to learn that the only data or narrative source that can be really trusted is that of the DNC .

Originally Posted by Guest

Look all of you " Deplorables " , when are you going to learn that the only data or narrative source that can be really trusted is that of the DNC .

Yep, just ask Debbie WhatsHerName. She'll set you straight.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yep, just ask Debbie WhatsHerName. She'll set you straight.

" Half are Deplorable and the other half are just stupid or something ".