Originally Posted by Guest

As far as I know, Iran's Khameni has not been invited to sign books for sale at The Villages Barnes & Noble.

As far as Ann Coulter, her writing is very sophomoric and she thinks she has great satirical wit. She is only half right.

If Coulter called you a Fuc-ing Lutheran to your face, you would be angry at that and probably would not read her column again - much less buy a book from the ignorant slut.

I suggest you don't buy her book.

I think her wit was misplaced and taken out of context. How many times does it take for you to get that she is strongly pro-Israel??

Instead of your trendy feel-good protest, I further suggest you do something that MATTERS, if you are truly pro-Israel. The existential threat to Israel's survival posed by Iran is an excellent place to start.

Originally Posted by Guest

As far as I know, Iran's Khameni has not been invited to sign books for sale at The Villages Barnes & Noble.

As far as Ann Coulter, her writing is very sophomoric and she thinks she has great satirical wit. She is only half right.

If Coulter called you a Fuc-ing Lutheran to your face, you would be angry at that and probably would not read her column again - much less buy a book from the ignorant slut.

That's OK, I doubt the "ignorant slut" would buy your book either

I will check back later to see if this thread has ascended up to the gutter from its current depths!

Originally Posted by Guest

There you go again ... deliberating distorting the reality. You KNOW that Cruz's father is an ardent anticommunist. Yet you distract because you're losing the debate ... nothing new there.

Did he fight with Castro? Yes or No....

Originally Posted by Guest

I think "the" most anti-Semitic person around is Debbie Blabbermouth.

Even though she's a Jew, she voted for the Iran deal knowing it will harm Israel. But, she had to cover her political a** in that she's a muckety muck in the Democrat party.

That's pretty offensive and despicable.

In all the time I have referenced the person in question I have called her by name Ann Coulter. You however go directly to name calling.

So sad for you!!

Originally Posted by Guest

Did he fight with Castro? Yes or No....

What difference does it make, as your Clinton would say. Are you going to protest Cruz because of his father? I'm sure that the Villages would miss you ........not.

Originally Posted by Guest

The "F###ing Jews" remark did go over my head

Another example of your deciding not to know the full context of the interview in it's totality. So, it DID go over your head, but the one that is leading you, probably knew that it would. Otherwise, your leader would have no control at manipulating you. It doesn't take much to lead the naive.

Originally Posted by Guest

There are still blue collar democrats around including myself and I was out there protesting!!!

And naive enough not to know what you were protesting. Funny.

Originally Posted by Guest

I think Obama has signed, knowingly or unknowingly, Israel's death warrant over the next 20 years with the Iran deal. It won't happen in an instant nor necessarily with a nuke as you say.

That's why, when I see credulous and gullible protestors, a lot of them carrying Israeli flags, upset over a supposed anti-Semitic remark, I have to shake my head at the sheer and utter foolishness (or is it cluelessness) of the true believers on the Left.

Wow ... just amazing to watch. It probably would literally take a nuclear flash to shake some of them out of their ignorance.

As a new day dawns on the political forums, here is a possibly unpopular post in regards to decorum.
These are political forums, so emotion tends to run high. Add to that the anonymous nature of the posts, and it becomes an insult fest. Fine, those seem to be the rules of the game, if you can't handle it, play elsewhere. But I would hope that at the end of the day, we realize it should all pretty much be in good fun. If you are SO serious, SO committed to your cause, I suggest you apply the following litmus test: Would I respond face to face verbally the same way I posted a response anonymously?

Vile personal attacks are another matter. You are making personal assumptions about someone you do not know. They do not come anywhere near reflecting poorly on the victim as they do on the attacker. Remember, the poster you villainized may live next door to you. If you doubt it, why not walk outside and tell your neighbor that you just called someone on TOTV a "#^%$#" because he expressed opinion "xyz". You should have just a little fear that YOU will then get slammed, to the ground. ESPECIALLY if I am your neighbor

Originally Posted by Guest

That's OK, I doubt the "ignorant slut" would buy your book either

Funny how you take the statement out of context of the interview. Of course, how would you know, you haven't read the transcript yet. You are just as misinformed as your leaders, Pelosi and Reid that say you have to pass the bill before you can read it and know what's in it. You have no problem with their poisonous verbiage and slander, because you probably don't even pay attention. Your mind is still reminiscing about the good old days of Vietnam protests, also based on your ignorance. I bet your family is real proud of their loony senior family member, marching around the town square protesting against a working person. If you had read the transcript or listened to the interview that you use as an excuse to ostercise Coulter, you would notice (if not totally stupid) that the interviewer was baiting her, pushing her to give a heated and spontaneous response. His interview was boring and he was desperate to get it noticed. Kind of like getting assigned to reporting a story on a local garden show. But, being naive as you are, and not so religious as you claim (it's obvious) you jumped at a chance to relive old times, when tie dyed shirts, tabs of acid and free sex was your great rush. You must be very bored and unhappy. Too bad you haven't taken advantage of all the great activities available in the Villages.

Originally Posted by Guest

I suggest you don't buy her book.

I think her wit was misplaced and taken out of context. How many times does it take for you to get that she is strongly pro-Israel??

Instead of your trendy feel-good protest, I further suggest you do something that MATTERS, if you are truly pro-Israel. The existential threat to Israel's survival posed by Iran is an excellent place to start.

That's the point, she's not "truly pro-Israel" at all. She just needed to protest something. The Villages doesn't offer her enough of an outlet for her old memories of protesting and fighting police lines during the Vietnam war. She admitted that, in the theme of her argument.

Originally Posted by Guest

Funny how you take the statement out of context of the interview. Of course, how would you know, you haven't read the transcript yet. You are just as misinformed as your leaders, Pelosi and Reid that say you have to pass the bill before you can read it and know what's in it. You have no problem with their poisonous verbiage and slander, because you probably don't even pay attention. Your mind is still reminiscing about the good old days of Vietnam protests, also based on your ignorance. I bet your family is real proud of their loony senior family member, marching around the town square protesting against a working person. If you had read the transcript or listened to the interview that you use as an excuse to ostercise Coulter, you would notice (if not totally stupid) that the interviewer was baiting her, pushing her to give a heated and spontaneous response. His interview was boring and he was desperate to get it noticed. Kind of like getting assigned to reporting a story on a local garden show. But, being naive as you are, and not so religious as you claim (it's obvious) you jumped at a chance to relive old times, when tie dyed shirts, tabs of acid and free sex was your great rush. You must be very bored and unhappy. Too bad you haven't taken advantage of all the great activities available in the Villages.

Nice response, but directed at the wrong person. Please re-read post 152.

Originally Posted by Guest

Nice response, but directed at the wrong person. Please re-read post 152.

You're right. I clicked on the wrong post when I went to respond. One shouldn't operate in a computer forum until one has first consumed two cups of java in the morning. I am sure the the post will still have the same effect.

Originally Posted by Guest

You're right. I clicked on the wrong post when I went to respond. One shouldn't operate in a computer forum until one has first consumed two cups of java in the morning. I am sure the the post will still have the same effect.

I hope it does. Posts like that one reflect the "sound-bite" nature of the political scene---the totality of the message as a whole is ignored in favor of distorted little phrases that belie the truth.

PS---I only noticed after MY 2 cups of coffee