He was registered to vote as a female, unaffiliated. Does that make him technically or non-technically transgender? Just wondering.

Originally Posted by Guest

Last time I looked they didn't break any laws. Just another conservative hysteria fit.

How about sharing with us what you looked at and where.

Originally Posted by Guest

He was registered to vote as a female, unaffiliated. Does that make him technically or non-technically transgender? Just wondering.

Clerical transgender....LOL

Originally Posted by Guest

I get it. You really do believe that the videos of PP selling body parts is fabricated. That is so naive and almost funny To think that there are actually poor idiots in this world that think only what they are told to think.

And since someone killed someone else near your summer home, it's a disaster in near comparison of the twin towers being destroyed.

It's not terrorism, but you folks go ahead in your hysteria and cry about that big bad terrorist. Just some dumb deranged schmuck with anger issues, but maybe your messiah in D.C. will agree with you. Something to take the heat off of his ISIS brothers.

You should seek some help for your anger issues.

While this attack is not on the scale of the Twin Towers it still an act of terror.

Originally Posted by Guest

How about sharing with us what you looked at and where.

Liberals don't BREAK the law, they just bend it to their will. Hilary didn't break the federal laws when she exposed top secret material on the Internet. PP didn't break the laws forbidding the sale of body parts, just slightly bent to rules a bit to make a profit. After all, cars expensive and you know how doctors don't make much.

Originally Posted by Guest

Ah now I get it.
What they do is OK because they don't charge for the parts?

BS!

The Supreme Court ruled on this many years ago....women have the right to safe abortions. Therefore Planned Parenthood is providing a legal service to women.

I am a woman who has never needed an abortion nor do I believe could I choose that option but I don't impose my beliefs on others. That choice is theirs

To answer your question, the medical community requires this material for research. Women can legally donate the tissue and PP can legally charge for the shipping fees.

So yes it is ok for PP to provide this service.

Originally Posted by Guest

You should seek some help for your anger issues.

While this attack is not on the scale of the Twin Towers it still an act of terror.

I saw a buck that was rutting once, years ago up North. He was so out of control that he ran into a parked police car and left what looked like bullet holes in the car door, with his antlers. Definitely an act of terror. Or, do you think that it was just a difference in political ideology?

Originally Posted by Guest

I saw a buck that was rutting once, years ago up North. He was so out of control that he ran into a parked police car and left what looked like bullet holes in the car door, with his antlers. Definitely an act of terror. Or, do you think that it was just a difference in political ideology?

Just like a male... Always rutting fixated on sex

Originally Posted by Guest

Liberals don't BREAK the law, they just bend it to their will. Hilary didn't break the federal laws when she exposed top secret material on the Internet. PP didn't break the laws forbidding the sale of body parts, just slightly bent to rules a bit to make a profit. After all, cars expensive and you know how doctors don't make much.

I don't believe there is ant evidence the emails where on the internet just on a secured server.

Originally Posted by Guest

I don't believe there is ant evidence the emails where on the internet just on a secured server.

She was using an UNSECURED, UNENCRYPTED server on the Internet. She violated Federal law related to handling of classified material. If you need the specific laws she broke, I also have them. I worked for the gov. information management and I do know the law. Excusing her because of who she is, is not productive for our country. She should be held accountable just as any other employee of the U.S. government. I have seen employees severely punished as a result of negligent mishandling of classified material. As a matter of fact, it even takes a specific type of shredder to destroy some levels of classified material. So, in my opinion excusing her is not an option. She violated some very serious laws and rules that jeopardized national security and could have or might have damaged our national integrity. Anyone that has ever worked in IT knows how serious this issue is.

Originally Posted by Guest

She was using an UNSECURED, UNENCRYPTED server on the Internet. She violated Federal law related to handling of classified material. If you need the specific laws she broke, I also have them. I worked for the gov. information management and I do know the law. Excusing her because of who she is, is not productive for our country. She should be held accountable just as any other employee of the U.S. government. I have seen employees severely punished as a result of negligent mishandling of classified material. As a matter of fact, it even takes a specific type of shredder to destroy some levels of classified material. So, in my opinion excusing her is not an option. She violated some very serious laws and rules that jeopardized national security and could have or might have damaged our national integrity. Anyone that has ever worked in IT knows how serious this issue is.

You might want to check the regs when she took the position

Originally Posted by Guest

You might want to check the regs when she took the position

They are the same now as when she took the position. Classified information is protected on a secured and encrypted system, not on the internet. She violated the law regarding handling and destruction of classified information. The worst part was that she did not ONLY had confidential information on her unclassified system at home, like a certain convicted general, but she even had information of secret and top secret nature. She is definitely as guilty as some of our worst spies. Many in our congress do not even know how seriously she violated the laws. They are just shooting in the dark. Anyone that works for the gov with classified knows what she did. I recently spoke to a friend that still works in the State Dept and he just shook his head in wonder of how she has gotten away with it. Any half-@ss hacker could have, might have had access to her information and the classified on her server. On top of that, the service provider that worked on her server was not cleared for classified information and had access to it. Nope, she is a major felon and should be behind bars.

Originally Posted by Guest

You might want to check the regs when she took the position

Regulations can get you fired if you violate them. Federal laws violated can and should get her incarcerated. There is NO excuse for what she did.

Originally Posted by Guest

Regulations can get you fired if you violate them. Federal laws violated can and should get her incarcerated. There is NO excuse for what she did.

UNLESS one is a lawyer trained politician!!!

Colin Powell admitted he did the same thing. Would you like to see him incarcerated as well? I didn't think so.