Originally Posted by Guest

Better get used to it. She'll be riding on a 747 next. Trump will keep hosing you suckers.

Are the U.S. Marshalls transporting prisoners by 747 now?

Just so you know I am voting for Trump.

I'm voting for Trump also. So is my wife, three daughters and my son. As a matter of fact, out of my mostly Democrat family, I know of only one that says she is voting for Hillary, but it is doubtful she will even turn out to vote.

Dear OP

Let me begin by stating application of moral equivalency is not the way I would analyze or judge a situation. Good or bad and moral equivalency is usually applied to bad is a wasted exercise. A person's actions should be based solely on what that person did or did not do. Moral equivalency's intent is obvious...Nice try for Hillary but if you had to try why didn't you compare her to the actions of Charlie Rangel or Terry McAuliffe?

I would like to thank the poster who provided the link to fact checked. It has lost its credibility with me.

Trump was accused of exaggerations Quite possible indeed because he is full of himself.

Hillary's alleged malfesance go quit farther. We now know thankful from Wikileak that Trump was right in reinforcing Sanders claims that the system was rigged for Hillary. further Wikileak provided proof that the Democrats orchestrated the so called protests against Trump. These protests could have gotten out of hand and resulted in serious consequences

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Dear OP

Let me begin by stating application of moral equivalency is not the way I would analyze or judge a situation. Good or bad and moral equivalency is usually applied to bad is a wasted exercise. A person's actions should be based solely on what that person did or did not do. Moral equivalency's intent is obvious...Nice try for Hillary but if you had to try why didn't you compare her to the actions of Charlie Rangel or Terry McAuliffe?

I would like to thank the poster who provided the link to fact checked. It has lost its credibility with me.

Trump was accused of exaggerations Quite possible indeed because he is full of himself.

Hillary's alleged malfesance go quit farther. We now know thankful from Wikileak that Trump was right in reinforcing Sanders claims that the system was rigged for Hillary. further Wikileak provided proof that the Democrats orchestrated the so called protests against Trump. These protests could have gotten out of hand and resulted in serious consequences

Personal Best Regards:

Good, level headed post...

We do need some NEW Leadership in this country. Four to Eight more years of the same road we are going down will be terrible for my kids and grandkids. Sure Trump will make mistakes as they all do but at least it will be NEW Leadership. The Clinton's already had the Whitehouse for 8 years.
And by the way did Hillary ever return the china and silverware??

Originally Posted by Guest

We do need some NEW Leadership in this country. Four to Eight more years of the same road we are going down will be terrible for my kids and grandkids. Sure Trump will make mistakes as they all do but at least it will be NEW Leadership. The Clinton's already had the Whitehouse for 8 years.
And by the way did Hillary ever return the china and silverware??

It's NOT new leadership if the same old parties are in control, it's meet the new boss, same as the old boss. If you want CHANGE in leadership, you MUST eliminate the D and R party.

New doesn't mean better. Given Trumps record and personality defects, in my opinion he would be a step backwards. Many prominent republicans, including Trump, have said how Hillary would make a good President. My vote us with her.

Originally Posted by Guest

New doesn't mean better. Given Trumps record and personality defects, in my opinion he would be a step backwards. Many prominent republicans, including Trump, have said how Hillary would make a good President. My vote us with her.

So, you value Trumps recommendation, but not Trump? Very interesting. Have you talked to a therapist regarding your confusion? And you mention Trumps successful record and then contradict yourself and say he would be a step backwards? Lady, you have major flaws yourself.

Originally Posted by Guest

So, you value Trumps recommendation, but not Trump? Very interesting. Have you talked to a therapist regarding your confusion? And you mention Trumps successful record and then contradict yourself and say he would be a step backwards? Lady, you have major flaws yourself.

They ALL do...and we let them vote! What were we thinking? Why WEREN'T we thinking?

Originally Posted by Guest

They ALL do...and we let them vote! What were we thinking? Why WEREN'T we thinking?

The only flaw that I am concerned with today is yours..ha,ha.

Originally Posted by Guest

Hilarious! Dunces that plan to vote for Hillary IF she is not in jail (and probably even then) and have the audacity to attack someone better than them. You two should get together for a cold beverage. I'll even pay for it. It would be so great to see the two of you together.....oh wait????

You conveniently forget trump will go on trial for the trump university fraud, lots of luck having a president on probation. God help us if he is elected.

Originally Posted by Guest

You conveniently forget trump will go on trial for the trump university fraud, lots of luck having a president on probation. God help us if he is elected.

A civil trial is not even close to a felony criminal indictment that HELLary will get when she loses the election.

Originally Posted by Guest

You conveniently forget trump will go on trial for the trump university fraud, lots of luck having a president on probation. God help us if he is elected.

Just to be clear it is a company named " Trump University " that would be sued in a Civil not a Criminal Court and not a person by the name of Trump .

Originally Posted by Guest

Not my post but who did the fact checking. That can be slanted at times. I read a CNN fact check today and felt it was a little bias in Hillary's favor. IMO

I think what you may mean is that HE demonstrably lies MUCH more about virtually everything than SHE does, and that therefore you feel a little bias in her favor.