Originally Posted by Rockyrd

A well thought out, substantive post.

Researched and presented in such an adult manner.

Your mother must be so proud.

Go upstairs and ask her.

Just as thought out and researched as your drama filled posts...

My mom is proud of me! She tells me often. We are 1100 miles apart, but we talk almost every morning (except Thursday mornings when I volunteer).

I would love to have my mom live with me, but she is only 75 and tells me she prefers living on her own.

I do not have a basement in any of my homes in The Villages...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

[QUOTE=Guest]

Originally Posted by Guest

Here is where you ramp up with the drama...fag!

An article, that your not ready to link? No copy and paste in bold and red font??

LOL...more like another opinion columnist's made up crap, that you all to often confuse with the term "fact".

You should be concerned with what is going on in your own home, because I doubt your wife is into lesbian relationships, and you are behaving like a woman.[/QUOTE]

"Republican officials reportedly imagine Donald Trump's chief of staff and defence secretary have had conversations about "physically [restraining]" him if he "lunged for the nuclear football."

Gabriel Sherman, a contributing editor at New York Magazine, told MSNBC's All In with Chris Hayes a senior republican had told him they imagined conversations between General John Kelly and James Mattis about what to do if Mr Trump attempted to launch a nuclear strike.

Mr Sherman said: “I just want to put into context a conversation that I had with a very prominent Republican today, who literally was saying that they imagine General Kelly and Secretary Mattis had conversations about if Trump lunged for the nuclear football, what would they do? "

Republicans 'discuss Donald Trump's chief of staff tackling him to stop him lunging for nuclear football' | The Independent

"Imagine" is mentioned twice in this link - how in the world is this considered news?? I have to be missing something here, right?!?

It seems the male poster here loves to call women names, comment on their physical appearance, is frightened by the idea of menstrual blood, etc. but has no substantive, intelligent addition to the conversation. Are we dealing with a Trump doppelganger?

Originally Posted by Guest

It seems the male poster here loves to call women names, comment on their physical appearance, is frightened by the idea of menstrual blood, etc. but has no substantive, intelligent addition to the conversation. Are we dealing with a Trump doppelganger?

Abby...

Post 22, I was very specific I did not want to link to this story.

In post 30, I was called a "fag" and challenged, so in post 31, I simply posted it.

You are becoming like your brotherhood on here.

I don't post links that are not credible. I didn't post this originally because of that.

One of your buddies called me out on it, with the added insults, so I posted it sans comment.

Originally Posted by Guest

Abby...

Post 22, I was very specific I did not want to link to this story.

In post 30, I was called a "fag" and challenged, so in post 31, I simply posted it.

You are becoming like your brotherhood on here.

I don't post links that are not credible. I didn't post this originally because of that.

One of your buddies called me out on it, with the added insults, so I posted it sans comment.

Just a heads up, but I think you quoted the wrong post.

Abby 10 posted #47.

Originally Posted by Guest

Abby...

Post 22, I was very specific I did not want to link to this story.

In post 30, I was called a "fag" and challenged, so in post 31, I simply posted it.

You are becoming like your brotherhood on here.

I don't post links that are not credible. I didn't post this originally because of that.

One of your buddies called me out on it, with the added insults, so I posted it sans comment.

Ok. So you're saying it wasn't credible then? It did seem pretty ludicrous to me with the talk of how they imagined the various personnel saying these things. Don't you agree? Why would anyone even call that news? It's more akin to gossiping than news. How low can these guys go? This is a good example of why I doubt so much of the reporting out there. I've said before I'd much rather listen to someone being directly interviewed than all these news commentators referencing that an unnamed source said this or that. Seems to be a lot of that kind of reporting going on these days and we are expected to buy into it just because they said so.

Originally Posted by Guest

Ok. So you're saying it wasn't credible then? It did seem pretty ludicrous to me with the talk of how they imagined the various personnel saying these things. Don't you agree? Why would anyone even call that news? It's more akin to gossiping than news. How low can these guys go? This is a good example of why I doubt so much of the reporting out there. I've said before I'd much rather listen to someone being directly interviewed than all these news commentators referencing that an unnamed source said this or that. Seems to be a lot of that kind of reporting going on these days and we are expected to buy into it just because they said so.

Ding ding ding...we have a winner...congratulations Abby...you know that the "news" is really propaganda. Turn off the TV...close the newspapers...just do the puzzles. It's FULL of MISinformation.

Originally Posted by Guest

Just a heads up, but I think you quoted the wrong post.

Abby 10 posted #47.

I didn't even notice that and responded based off of post #47. Thanks for noting that.

Originally Posted by Guest

Ding ding ding...we have a winner...congratulations Abby...you know that the "news" is really propaganda. Turn off the TV...close the newspapers...just do the puzzles. It's FULL of MISinformation.

What, NO PRIZE?? I do like doing some of the puzzles.

Originally Posted by Guest

What, NO PRIZE?? I do like doing some of the puzzles.

You get the curse of knowing the truth...that pretty much EVERYTHING you see and hear on TV is a lie...propaganda.

You've taken the red pill. You can't go back...once you know...you can never believe them again. You'll start noticing the discrepancies...it reinforces itself. You'll begin laughing at how brazen they are with their lies.

Originally Posted by Guest

Ok. So you're saying it wasn't credible then? It did seem pretty ludicrous to me with the talk of how they imagined the various personnel saying these things. Don't you agree? Why would anyone even call that news? It's more akin to gossiping than news. How low can these guys go? This is a good example of why I doubt so much of the reporting out there. I've said before I'd much rather listen to someone being directly interviewed than all these news commentators referencing that an unnamed source said this or that. Seems to be a lot of that kind of reporting going on these days and we are expected to buy into it just because they said so.

No, stop being like all the other trolls.

I doubted the SOURCE, not a SOURCE I would like to use.

THE NEWS IS CREDIBLE IF YOU use credible sources, AND if you actually read things instead of scanning for things that represent your viewpoint.

It is total bunk that the MSM does not report facts. That is one of the things that this President has started to try to intimidate. They report facts.

I was very clear in my post that I was uncomfortable and not sure if I specified the source or not, but you are becoming like the trolls.

Defend this terrible, horrible person in the WH with whatever means. The media is picking on him......the judges pick on him...the other candidates picked on him.

It is sad..you seem so intelligent and yet you also want to put words in my mouth.

Your support for those who use obscenities is noted. At any cost defend this very bad person.

On the main board they are at the lying in support of this person.

NFL has very very seldom aired the anthem and now with you people that is an issue. HOW ABOUT TALKING ABOUT GOVERNING.....OH...wait he does not do that

Originally Posted by Guest

No, stop being like all the other trolls.

I doubted the SOURCE, not a SOURCE I would like to use.

THE NEWS IS CREDIBLE IF YOU use credible sources, AND if you actually read things instead of scanning for things that represent your viewpoint.

It is total bunk that the MSM does not report facts. That is one of the things that this President has started to try to intimidate. They report facts.

I was very clear in my post that I was uncomfortable and not sure if I specified the source or not, but you are becoming like the trolls.

Defend this terrible, horrible person in the WH with whatever means. The media is picking on him......the judges pick on him...the other candidates picked on him.

It is sad..you seem so intelligent and yet you also want to put words in my mouth.

Your support for those who use obscenities is noted. At any cost defend this very bad person.

On the main board they are at the lying in support of this person.

NFL has very very seldom aired the anthem and now with you people that is an issue. HOW ABOUT TALKING ABOUT GOVERNING.....OH...wait he does not do that

Originally Posted by Rockface Drama Queen

No, stop being like all the other trolls.

I doubted the SOURCE, not a SOURCE I would like to use.

THE NEWS IS CREDIBLE IF YOU use credible sources, AND if you actually read things instead of scanning for things that represent your viewpoint.

It is total bunk that the MSM does not report facts. That is one of the things that this President has started to try to intimidate. They report facts.

I was very clear in my post that I was uncomfortable and not sure if I specified the source or not, but you are becoming like the trolls.

Defend this terrible, horrible person in the WH with whatever means. The media is picking on him......the judges pick on him...the other candidates picked on him.

It is sad..you seem so intelligent and yet you also want to put words in my mouth.

Your support for those who use obscenities is noted. At any cost defend this very bad person.

On the main board they are at the lying in support of this person.

NFL has very very seldom aired the anthem and now with you people that is an issue. HOW ABOUT TALKING ABOUT GOVERNING.....OH...wait he does not do that

Funny, I doubted the creditability of your claim, turns out I was right.

Just another columnist's opinion piece that you considered fact and resulted in a other one of your DRAMA filled posts.

Note: If anyone sees the word "concern" in Rockface's post...it's only DRAMA...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

No, stop being like all the other trolls.

I doubted the SOURCE, not a SOURCE I would like to use.

THE NEWS IS CREDIBLE IF YOU use credible sources, AND if you actually read things instead of scanning for things that represent your viewpoint.

It is total bunk that the MSM does not report facts. That is one of the things that this President has started to try to intimidate. They report facts.

I was very clear in my post that I was uncomfortable and not sure if I specified the source or not, but you are becoming like the trolls.

Defend this terrible, horrible person in the WH with whatever means. The media is picking on him......the judges pick on him...the other candidates picked on him.

It is sad..you seem so intelligent and yet you also want to put words in my mouth.

Your support for those who use obscenities is noted. At any cost defend this very bad person.

On the main board they are at the lying in support of this person.

NFL has very very seldom aired the anthem and now with you people that is an issue. HOW ABOUT TALKING ABOUT GOVERNING.....OH...wait he does not do that

No it is NOT...it is propaganda. We ARE fed propaganda just like China, Russia, NK, and everyone else.

Originally Posted by Guest

No, stop being like all the other trolls.

I doubted the SOURCE, not a SOURCE I would like to use.

THE NEWS IS CREDIBLE IF YOU use credible sources, AND if you actually read things instead of scanning for things that represent your viewpoint.

It is total bunk that the MSM does not report facts. That is one of the things that this President has started to try to intimidate. They report facts.

I was very clear in my post that I was uncomfortable and not sure if I specified the source or not, but you are becoming like the trolls.

Defend this terrible, horrible person in the WH with whatever means. The media is picking on him......the judges pick on him...the other candidates picked on him.

It is sad..you seem so intelligent and yet you also want to put words in my mouth.

Your support for those who use obscenities is noted. At any cost defend this very bad person.

On the main board they are at the lying in support of this person.

NFL has very very seldom aired the anthem and now with you people that is an issue. HOW ABOUT TALKING ABOUT GOVERNING.....OH...wait he does not do that

Wow.......apparently I totally misread/misunderstood where you were coming from. And now I'm a troll because I don't agree with you? Thanks for explaining that.

My point was not to defend anyone and my view of the media did not start with Trump. This misinformation and swaying of the public has been going on for a long time. If you have not noticed, you have been turning a blind eye to it. I say that because YOU seem too smart to me not to know that.

I was not attempting to put words in your mouth.....did you notice the question marks? This is the problem with the written word vs speaking in person I guess. What concerns me is that it appears you want no discussion with anyone of a different opinion. That is unfortunate and may go along with the blind eye theory above. You have asked me not to engage with you before. Maybe I should stick to that. Again, unfortunate, because I don't mind differing opinions and believe that I can learn something from that type of discussion if I'm willing to listen.

Btw, I did read the source you provided - several times - because I couldn't believe what I was reading!