Trump shoots himself in the foot using the 'F' bomb in public meeting!!

 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 02-08-2016, 12:48 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Interesting article. You know they (the repubs) will disavow any responsibility.
Didn't see anything related to the subject of this thread.
  #32  
Old 02-08-2016, 02:05 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Definitely it is a low brow comment but it does show Donald as a "regular guy" who sometimes gets carried away and real emotion comes spouting out.

Many Presidents have been known as cussers. Truman, Kennedy, Johnson are the most notable.

It puts Trump in good company and not many will let one "F" bomb sway their vote.
Nixon put them all to shame

Personal Best Regards:
  #33  
Old 02-08-2016, 02:11 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Yes, let's take the country back to the 1950's where men worked and women stayed at home to take Prozac and alcohol. Men could legally beat their wives and kids but not too severely. Minorities were hidden away from good white folk and knew their place. Vote Santorum!
That is an absolute false, bias exaggeration. Everywhere in our society today women are ferred to as "b------"even by other women. there is less respect for women now than there was in the 1950's Drugs are more prevalent in today's society than they ever have been...should I go on

Personal Best Regards:
  #34  
Old 02-08-2016, 02:13 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Funny and accurate. Except Prozac wasn't marked until the late 1980s. In the 50's the happy housewife in her lovely apron took Miltown and barbiturates, and alcohol.
You actually believe women are happier in today's world?

Personal Best Regards:
  #35  
Old 02-08-2016, 02:20 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I had no problem with his statement about the shooting. It was an expression not a threat. And you know it. It only resonated with you because it was a conservative that said it. I have no intention of voting for him, but still understood what he meant. Apparently, you did not and that is probably the same reason you will vote for one of the two socialists.

Affirmative action has NOTHING to do with the constitution. Affirmative action gives preference to a group of people due to their race or gender. That is not "equal" in any definition. Go ahead and argue it but even the court supports my statement. And I have a cousin that was awarded promotions and back pay after he and some coworkers took it to court and won. So, you can take your affirmative action and do another unmentionable action with it.

And yes, when I respond to a comment that uses EXTREMES, I mean it. If you don't know what you are talking about, you really should be quiet because you just look like a fool. Next time, read the comment that I responded to before replying to my response.

If you don't like what people are doing with your liberal ideology, then do something about it, become conservative. Don't give me this cr@p about how misunderstood liberals are. Sanders is an admitted socialist, and Hillary is a radical liberal that believes in baby killing and free health care. If you can't accept the truth, you can always change to a conservative view.
I have no problem with Trump swearing in public. The comment was he was going to lose votes because of it. That is total nonsense. How many times must I say it. I am going to vote for Kasich. If the election is Trump vs. Clinton, I am going to vote for Donald Duck. Is my vote being wasted? Yes. However, that isn't as bad as wasting four years, if either Trump or Clinton is elected.

Affirmation Action was necessary, because minorities in the 50's, 60's, and 70's weren't being treated equally. It did get to the point where minorities wanted to treated more equally. If the phrase about all men are created equal wasn't in the Constitution, why would Affirmative Action laws be necessary in the first place?

Your comment was "liberal values are:". there was no talk about addressing only extreme liberals. If you are standing by your list, seek help from a qualified mental health professional.

Only in the world of conservative are there only two schools of thought, conservatives and liberals. I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but there are three. The third is moderates. Moderates want to see both parties working together to get things done. The other two are running into their corners shouting, and insulting the other, which guarantees that nothing will get done.
  #36  
Old 02-08-2016, 02:30 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As a practice I refrain from expletives and I refrain from talking about bathroom habits and I refrain from talking about my sex life.

In that same vein I recognized other people do and so turn the volume down on my hearing.

So its not Trump's language and insults that disturbs me..sticks and stones..... Its the reactions that cause Trump to act in the manner he does that concerns me. Why is it the man who claims he understands the "Art of the Deal" is unable to maintain his demeanor. Deal making is like playing poker and if Trump believes all his bluster fools the other guy well..........
I can tell you from experience if i was in a room with a guy acting like that there would be no discussion I'd walk
  #37  
Old 02-08-2016, 03:11 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
You actually believe women are happier in today's world?

Personal Best Regards:
Well, they used to live much longer than men, back then. Now, they live about the same length of time. Maybe the fact that women are more stressed than back then?
  #38  
Old 02-08-2016, 03:37 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Still don't see how any of this relates to the subject of the thread.
  #39  
Old 02-08-2016, 05:29 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
As a practice I refrain from expletives and I refrain from talking about bathroom habits and I refrain from talking about my sex life.

In that same vein I recognized other people do and so turn the volume down on my hearing.

So its not Trump's language and insults that disturbs me..sticks and stones..... Its the reactions that cause Trump to act in the manner he does that concerns me. Why is it the man who claims he understands the "Art of the Deal" is unable to maintain his demeanor. Deal making is like playing poker and if Trump believes all his bluster fools the other guy well..........
I can tell you from experience if i was in a room with a guy acting like that there would be no discussion I'd walk
You have nothing invested so walk talk is cheap!
  #40  
Old 02-08-2016, 07:10 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Funny and accurate. Except Prozac wasn't marked until the late 1980s. In the 50's the happy housewife in her lovely apron took Miltown and barbiturates, and alcohol.
While fine tuning the watermellon don't lose track of the message.
  #41  
Old 02-08-2016, 07:26 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
You actually believe women are happier in today's world?

Personal Best Regards:
A question you should ask your wife.
  #42  
Old 02-08-2016, 07:33 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
A question you should ask your wife.
Of course most of our wives are happier than they were 'X' number of years past.

And that status has absolutely NOTHING to do with politics or any politician or any government program or permissive changes to America or any specific religion or gender preference.

Most of us did it through hard work and providing for our families.

We were not distracted by all the political, race, permissive BS of the current day!!!!

Note the emphasis on the use of we and us!!!!!
  #43  
Old 02-08-2016, 09:54 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Of course most of our wives are happier than they were 'X' number of years past.

And that status has absolutely NOTHING to do with politics or any politician or any government program or permissive changes to America or any specific religion or gender preference.

Most of us did it through hard work and providing for our families.

We were not distracted by all the political, race, permissive BS of the current day!!!!

Note the emphasis on the use of we and us!!!!!


Some good points. But most of our wives and us were distracted by politics, race, and permissiveness. Just think about the late 60's and early 70's which were our late teens and 20's years. The Viet Nam war and the resulting political divide, race riots across the nation, and the drop out free love want to take you higher atmosphere that was popularized. So yes we were distracted, but like our previous generations we made it through. That is the strength of our country.
  #44  
Old 02-09-2016, 04:09 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Some good points. But most of our wives and us were distracted by politics, race, and permissiveness. Just think about the late 60's and early 70's which were our late teens and 20's years. The Viet Nam war and the resulting political divide, race riots across the nation, and the drop out free love want to take you higher atmosphere that was popularized. So yes we were distracted, but like our previous generations we made it through. That is the strength of our country.
For once, I agree with you, chi.

But, not all of our wives were involved in the above. Many were attempting to keep the house together by working at low paying jobs during the 60-70's. The statement made by the poster was about the 50's. During that period of time, women were held in pretty high regard, and were the cement that held the families together. They received a lot more respect than they are now. Today, if you treat a woman with the respect they deserve, they think you might be hitting on them, or they feel that you are being condescending. I am generalizing, of course and speaking mostly of the younger generation, not our seniors.

But, we went pretty far away from the original post regarding Trumps vulgar language. If we spoke of the 50's and such language, it would not be tolerated and would be immediately censored.
 

Tags
past, indicator, viable, candidate, ladder, perspective, fell, back, hurt, general, view, publics, appologize, emotionally, meeting, public, bomb, shoots, foot, driven, trump, poor, judgement, inexcusable, things


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 PM.