Originally Posted by Guest

Let me ask you this question, seriously. Is there really someone that gives a sh*t that he had his daughter in a meeting with the PM? And you do know that he is NOT yet the president, right? And if there is someone that cares, exactly for what reason does this concern them?

Other than you saying that he is in over his head, do you have any proof of that statement or is this just your biased opinion? You know I have said the same thing about Obama for several years after he was elected, and so have many others, but that did not seem to matter to Obama or anyone that voted for him. Of course, in my case I/we were right. And once Trump erases all of Obama's mistakes, no one will even know Obama existed.

There is a clear conflict of interest when the person running the Trump org (Ivanka) meets with a world leader.

Check out the Donald for signs of early Alzheimer's disease, a disease that killed his father. Remember how Ronnie Reagan acted in office years before being diagnosed.

Originally Posted by Guest

There is a clear conflict of interest when the person running the Trump org (Ivanka) meets with a world leader.

Check out the Donald for signs of early Alzheimer's disease, a disease that killed his father. Remember how Ronnie Reagan acted in office years before being diagnosed.

And yet Reagan is known as the best president in history. We could only hope for so much with Trump.

There is only a conflict of interest construed by those that want to believe there to be. He is not president and his daughter is part of his family. His family, that will be in and out of the White House, as would Billy if Hillary would have been elected. And Billy did not refrain from his lucrative business in their "charity" fund when she was Secstate and she did not refrain from being associated with the fund when she was Secstate. So, lets not get carried away.

Originally Posted by Guest

Let me ask you this question, seriously. Is there really someone that gives a sh*t that he had his daughter in a meeting with the PM? And you do know that he is NOT yet the president, right? And if there is someone that cares, exactly for what reason does this concern them?

Other than you saying that he is in over his head, do you have any proof of that statement or is this just your biased opinion? You know I have said the same thing about Obama for several years after he was elected, and so have many others, but that did not seem to matter to Obama or anyone that voted for him. Of course, in my case I/we were right. And once Trump erases all of Obama's mistakes, no one will even know Obama existed.

Let me try it this way.....

Imagine a movie idea...

About a very rich man who has actually called himself "the King of Debt" basically because he uses debt in running a real estate PRIVATELY OWNED company.

He runs this FAMILY BUSINESS. with his daughter and two sons.

The country, let's call it USA, has enemies and allies. One "enemy", let's call it Russia. Now Russia has nefarious goals. They want to dismantle NATO to stop people from halting their aggression in Europe; they want free reign in Syria to kill off the rebels.

That rich man, the Debt King, becomes President of the US. On his campaign, he hints he may want to at min weaken NATO; he heaps praise on Russ.

The new Presidents company is PRIVATE which allows secrecy and total privacy.. Normally, in presidential races, the candidates release their tax returns so as to rid any doubts of conflict of interests. This new President refused to do that, saying he could not because of being audited, which does not in any way prevent that release; actually many RICHER people also under audit release theirs or offer to in order to induce transparency but he still does not release them.

So, forgetting to add, the new President has done and continues to do billions of dollars in Russia, and with companies and countries that have supported terrorism.

So, this King of Debt is stopill trying to hold onto to control over his companies...he wants no real blind trust. He says his children will run the business.

So, his first meeting in person with a foreign rep, his daughter and son in law are the ones the new President insures attend the meeting.

Sound like a good movie ?

If in fact this new President can either make money or get help with large debt, should not the citizens know this might enter into our country's business ?

If transparency is the issue, and the election is over, why might he still be hiding his business interests from the country ?

Originally Posted by Guest

STOP ?

Stop ? I do not recall any such backlash on the racist, anti semitic personal attacks on this forum.

Are you requiring those who know something about Trump to be silenced ?

And do not go to Clinton or the "libtard" remarks. I am and always will be a conservative Republican......

I never posted anything about Trump policies (those we knew of) and never posted anything that was pro Clinton....

I simply am aware that our President is devoid of any traits that might even be construed as positive. I am also aware that until I see a tax return, I do not and will not trust anything he does with foreign countries. There was and is a reason for this coverup and secrecy.

I might suggest you wave a stop sign at others who simply spout out things with no facts, no understanding and frankly a lack of caring.

But if you say STOP....gee.....bye

Don't stop.

The world (and especially this site)...need more decent people like yourself.

Don't let the nasty bullies win.

Originally Posted by Guest

If in fact this new President can either make money or get help with large debt, should not the citizens know this might enter into our country's business ?

If transparency is the issue, and the election is over, why might he still be hiding his business interests from the country ?

Maybe because he is not the one that advocated transparency? It was Obama that promised it and failed.

Trump's private business is His business. You can move on now. Find something else to gig him on. His hair has already been used, so try something new.

Originally Posted by Guest

Maybe because he is not the one that advocated transparency? It was Obama that promised it and failed.

Trump's private business is His business. You can move on now. Find something else to gig him on. His hair has already been used, so try something new.

If his private business interferes with my country's business then it becomes all of our business. He knew that when he ran, but didn't expect to win....just expect more on this

This probably will not come as a surprise to anyone, but Ivanka Trump and husband, Jarod Kurshner. are registered democrats. Two New York Jews being democrats, who could see that coming?

Originally Posted by Guest

This probably will not come as a surprise to anyone, but Ivanka Trump and husband, Jarod Kurshner. are registered democrats. Two New York Jews being democrats, who could see that coming?

Old news.

Originally Posted by Guest

If his private business interferes with my country's business then it becomes all of our business. He knew that when he ran, but didn't expect to win....just expect more on this

And yet, you care nothing about REAL justice. Why aren't you screaming about prosecuting Hillary for all her crimes? Because it does not suit your fancy, right? Hypocrite.

Originally Posted by Guest

And yet, you care nothing about REAL justice. Why aren't you screaming about prosecuting Hillary for all her crimes? Because it does not suit your fancy, right? Hypocrite.

1. According to our justice system, Clinton has committed no crimes.

2. As often is said on here...she lost get over it. Why is she the subject of any post. Donald J Trump is President Elect.

Originally Posted by Guest

1. According to our justice system, Clinton has committed no crimes.

2. As often is said on here...she lost get over it. Why is she the subject of any post. Donald J Trump is President Elect.

Because as proved by this election, Hillary (and women/blacks in general) are hated more...than people love this country.

Originally Posted by Guest

1. According to our justice system, Clinton has committed no crimes.

I thought pot was only approved for Med use in Fl.

Where are you buying it?

Originally Posted by Guest

1. According to our justice system, Clinton has committed no crimes.

2. As often is said on here...she lost get over it. Why is she the subject of any post. Donald J Trump is President Elect.

Not true. She has not been exonerated in court. The FBI found plenty of evidence of her culpability regarding felonies. They just said they were not going to charge her. That's where the problem is. I am not a lawyer, but I do have some law enforcement experience and even I could present a good enough case to get her convicted in a court of law. And yes, I probably know more about handling classified information in the State Dept environment than Comey. I had to be an expert or go to jail, at the very least be fired from the State Dept. So, if I do not know more than he does, I bet I know as much as he does on the State Dept side.

Sorry, but I will not "get over it" until Hillary is held accountable for her multitude of criminal violations. Violations that contributed to the deaths of several Americans. You do not care about those Americans dying but others do.

F**king Hillery did this to Chris Stevens and others

Anyone think she's not a lying scumbag





March 23, 2011: In this email, Clinton’s then-chief of staff Jacob Sullivan wrote to Clinton about the NATO mission in Libya. Sullivan also wrote that someone named Bill was “trying to make sure Chris Stevens gets into E. Libya.”
March 27, 2011: This is an email between two State Department officials that was then forwarded to Clinton. Regarding his location and travel plans, the email said, “The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to Benghazi. He will stage off shore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground. The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”
April 8, 2011: An email among State Department employees that was later forwarded to Clinton said, “Security situation in Benghazi remains quiet. Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”
April 10, 2011: Another email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton marked said, “The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi. The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout.
April 24, 2011: A final email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton: “Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination. He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa, but that is some way off.”