Originally Posted by Guest

Replacement candidates so we can actually discuss issues.

Impossible

My bet is that if anyone is charged, it will be Trump well before Clinton. We have not even scratched the surface with him.

Silly, get to casino quick they need your money

Sorry...thought this dang thread was about Trumps secret and HUGE debt to China, Russia and the like. Imagine, a President PERSONALLY indebted to those countries in the millions ??? WOW

Where did he personally guarantee the loans?

Russia? where?

Huge debt, you know little about biz buddy, that is about 5% of his assets, peanuts.


Nothing that he's says rises to the level of her perjury, lies and money laundering.

see if this helps understand better (perhaps Cpa can explain better)


Debt ratios can be used to describe the financial health of individuals, businesses or governments. Like other accounting ratios, investors and lenders calculate the debt ratio for a business from major financial statements.

The debt ratio for a given company reveals whether or not it has loans and, if so, how its credit financing compares to its assets. It is calculated by dividing total liabilities by total assets, with higher debt ratios indicating higher degrees of debt financing. Whether or not a debt ratio is good depends on the context within which it is being analyzed.

From a pure risk perspective, lower ratios (0.4 or lower) are considered better debt ratios. Since the interest on a debt must be paid regardless of business profitability, too much debt may compromise the entire operation if cash flow dries up. Companies unable to service their own debt may be forced to sell off assets or declare bankruptcy.

A higher debt ratio (0.6 or higher) makes it more difficult to borrow money. Lenders often have debt ratio limits and do not extend further credit to firms that are over-leveraged. Of course, there are other factors as well, such as credit worthiness, payment history and professional relationships.

On the other hand, investors rarely want to purchase the stock of a company with extremely low debt ratios. A debt ratio of zero would indicate that the firm does not finance increased operations through borrowing at all, which limits the total return that can be realized and passed on to shareholders. While the debt to equity ratio is a better measure of opportunity cost than the basic debt ratio, this principle still holds true: there is some risk associated with having too little debt.

Generally speaking, larger and more established companies are able to push the liabilities side of their ledgers further than newer or smaller companies. Larger companies tend to have more solidified cash flows, and they are also more likely to have negotiable relationships with their lenders.

Debt ratios are also interest rate sensitive; all-interest bearing assets have interest rate risk, whether they are business loans or bonds. During times of high interest rates, good debt ratios tend to be lower than during low-rate periods. The same principal amount is more expensive to pay off at 10% than it is at 5%.

This still doesn't effectively answer the question regarding a good or bad debt ratio. There is a sense that all debt ratio analysis must be done on a company-by-company basis. Balancing the dual risks of debt – credit risk and opportunity cost – is something that all companies must do. Certain sectors are more prone to large levels of indebtedness than others, however. Capital-intensive businesses, such as manufacturing or utilities, can get away with slightly higher debt ratios when they are expanding operations. Evaluate industry standards and historical performance relative to debt levels. Many investors look for a company to have a debt ratio between 0.3 and 0.6.

Cnm et al have zero facts concerning trump wrongdoing. Every treasonist thing Hillary has done dictates that even if elected she will be impeached. But the smart money is on trump!

Think about it husband wife impeachment, funny. Two pieces of Merda

Originally Posted by Guest

Cnm et al have zero facts concerning trump wrongdoing. Every treasonist thing Hillary has done dictates that even if elected she will be impeached. But the smart money is on trump!

Think about it husband wife impeachment, funny. Two pieces of Merda

Interesting how you folks know so much about Trumps money.

He lied SUBSTANTIALLY on his original filed documents, and will not allow the voters to see his tax return, even those not being audited.

I put them both in the same category....I can't defend or support Clinton based on what I don't know, and Trump, WHO BY THE WAY HAS MANY MORE SECRETS simply based on Clinton leading a very public life.

Trump has already lied numerous times on his finances...we now know he sort of misstated his number of bankruptcies for one, and lied on his initial filings.

So, I guess it is pick your poison. We know more about Clinton, but anyone...ANYONE, since this is about Trump...ANYONE who says they know anything at all about Trumps finances lis just blowing smoke.

Originally Posted by Guest

Cnm et al have zero facts concerning trump wrongdoing. Every treasonist thing Hillary has done dictates that even if elected she will be impeached. But the smart money is on trump!

Think about it husband wife impeachment, funny. Two pieces of Merda

Funny, we KNOW he will be going to court based on accusations of fraud concerning Trump U, and can only surmise about the states that we're going to prosecute until something occurred..in Florida a substantial "contribution" to the attorney general.

We KNOW about all the fines he has paid base in his PERSONAL actions regarding race in his businesses.

We KNOW he has told so many lies on this campaign they have seperate websites to keep up. The one that made me laugh was how he boasted about his hotels supplying child care for employees. Of course, the correction was it was ONLY for guests.

We know a lot, but you are correct....Trump has more secrets than Clinton for sure.

Originally Posted by Guest

Trump has already lied numerous times on his finances...we now know he sort of misstated his number of bankruptcies for one, and lied on his initial filings.

lied, like what?

He never filed bankruptcy ever.

He had 4 companies that filed a chapter 11, do you you know that in an 11 people are paid albeit less but better than zero.

all employees are paid in full along with all taxes as mandated under the Bankruptcy Act.

In an 11 the company and all employees kept working, it is a positive not negative thing to do rather than close the doors and walk away, it's called reorganization, thousands of companies exercise their rights to do so.

Eastman Kodak, Texaco, Dow Corning, Delta Airlines and United Airlines. oh and the small company called GM.

"Bankruptcy does not have the stigma attached to it that is used to have,"

Originally Posted by Guest

lied, like what?

He never filed bankruptcy ever.

He had 4 companies that filed a chapter 11, do you you know that in an 11 people are paid albeit less but better than zero.

all employees are paid in full along with all taxes as mandated under the Bankruptcy Act.

In an 11 the company and all employees kept working, it is a positive not negative thing to do rather than close the doors and walk away, it's called reorganization, thousands of companies exercise their rights to do so.

Eastman Kodak, Texaco, Dow Corning, Delta Airlines and United Airlines. oh and the small company called GM.

"Bankruptcy does not have the stigma attached to it that is used to have,"

Actually it was 6 times. He said never, then 4, but the number is 6.

Would not call it a positive thing because people lose lots of money, but I suppose it is how you view it. But it is a practice he has perfected.

On the lies, you certainly must be kidding. He lies...well, recently there were fact checks done on his first ad, and there was a lie every 4 seconds.

If you believe him to be honest, then you certainly must live in a cave.

He is just about the most pathological liar, self centered egoist, insensitive, unfeeling, immoral .....but I digress from his debts and ties to foreign countries.

Time will come soon when he will be called on lots of this. He is spending his time now proffering the conspiracy theories being fed. I knew about the health of Clinton conspiracy...just heard about he and that Hannity joker lying about Trump sending a helicopter to save some marines...he made that up.

How the heck do you elect a person like that to anything, and then weigh a man who lies like he does having vast financial interests in Russia and China ? When I think back to the attacks in Romney, I must laugh.

Trumps time is coming...that I KNOW and the books on this person are ugly.

I feel bad for his supporters, as I did with Madoffs. They are following a pied piper of lies.

Speaking of the multiple Trump lies, this piece was sad, but humorous....

"The lying started at 7:27 a.m. and did not stop until after dark.
Even for Donald Trump, Monday, Aug. 1, was a banner day for bull****.
With 100 days until Election Day, the Republican presidential nominee decisively rejected suggestions that he make some attempt to appear statesmanlike in his campaign against Hillary Clinton, opting to commit fully to the erraticism and dishonesty that characterized his performance in the Republican primary. "

15 Hours of Donald Trump’s Lies - The Daily Beast

Then this piece from Newsweek....

"That makes no sense, and here’s a crucial thing to know about Trump: He never tries to make his lies or delusions or fantasies make sense. He just spews to explain away the inexplicable."

Donald Trump’s History of Lying Under Oath

Experience tells me that most Trumpers do not read or CARE about lying. They join Trump in blaming the media, not saints for sure, but he believes them to be always wrong.....

EXCEPT if they, using his words "like him"

"The consensus among non-partisan observers is that the speech that Donald Trump gave about ISIS was so full of lies, inconsistencies, and gibberish that it made no sense."


The Reviews Are In: Trump ISIS Speech Was Full Of Lies And Gibberish That Made No Sense

Originally Posted by Guest

Still waiting for one fact about trump that is worse than Hillarys factual past. Just one.

trump going to trial for trump university. Once a con man, always a con man.

that is not yet decided, correct.

or do you know otherwise?

Originally Posted by Guest

trump going to trial for trump university. Once a con man, always a con man.

How does that work out with our top secrets being place on unsecured devices by what's her name???

Not an expert, but you seem to completely change the thread every time you get responses you don't like.

The thread is about Trump. You said he didn't lie. It has been shown that he is pathological.

Then you go to Clinton instead of facing the fact they both suck..big time.

Keep on the thread. Lots others for you to vent on Clinton

Some interesting reading......

Trump ranks higher than Hitler in psychopath test - NY Daily News

Originally Posted by Guest

The thread is about Trump. You said he didn't lie. It has been shown that he is pathological.

Has he lied to Congress?

She did

Who committed Perjury?

Who may be facing RICCO charges?

who made over 100 million dollars after leaving the WH broke?

Who risked top secrets in private servers.

Who dropped the ball in Bengazi?

His lies are nothing in comparison.

Are we better off now in the last 8 years, do we want another 4 of the same.

Trumps debt is nothing a non issue moreover, it's corporate not personal