Originally Posted by Guest

First of all, I object to the phrase "our" President ...

"the ONE" is appropriate. What a disappointment, is another way to describe him.

Originally Posted by Guest

I am typing this and already sorry that I am responding.

You are to be applauded for your total and complete support for the President, You would support this man under any or all circumstances.

Just a few and there are so many....but just a few suggestions.

First, visit the CBO analysis, which is a fluid and dynamic figure, but study the impact of the ACA on our economy, the cost WHEN IT FINALLY IS FINALLY TOTALLY IN OPERATION which is not now. Tell me how this country can afford that ?

On the Iran deal, while there is so much to say let me just ask you this question. Already, Iran is in Russia illegally negotiating ICBMS. England, France and Russia are all opening embassies as quick as they can because the money going into their coffers, along with China is going to be a massive amount. Iran is already making threats. Iran has already magically discovered more material than they knew they had....read sarcasm. They will do their own inspection of military site selected by them and get back to us.

Ok...let us assume that in the first year, Iran is caught with their hands in the cookie jar so to speak, in one way or the other...doing something they should not be doing. We say, that deal will be done.

Ok....how do you think those countries that now have a better economy and are dealing in trade with Iran will handle that ? Do you think they will say...oh, they cheated....lets pull the plug on the deal.

NOPE....all our bluster is just that...bluster. This is a NON REVERSABLE DEAL.

And as bad a deal as could be done. We rolled over on all our pre conceived ideas on what we want

I do compliment you though...you will support this administration at and on anything.

And please, despite your support for the President, can you skip the racial crap. it is insulting and does not apply, although, as the President feels it applies in everything.

Thank you so much for going out of your way to respond. There is so much to talk about the Iran deal, but instead of that you ask a question. Who answers a question with a question, a person that doesn't want to answer the initial question. That's who!

"They will do their own inspection of military site selected by them and get back to us." Where in the name of creation did you get that from? The IAEA will let them take their own samples as long as a IAEA inspector is there. That statement came for the head of the IAEA. I thought that you trusted the IAEA. The IAEA will be reporting their finding on the inspection by year end. They will have an inspection of all Iranian nuclear sites, and every suspected nuclear sites. The initial portion Iranian money will not be released until the IAEA is satisfied that Iran has meet the requirements under the agreement.

If we back out of the deal, then Iran doesn't have to cheat, because there is no deal. We are standing there alone with our thumps up our ass wondering what happened. You said all the other P5plus1 countries in the country have an economical reason to trade with Iran, and they are going to do it anyway. So, what the hell are we gaining by not accepting the deal? If Iran cheats, at least we have something to bring up with the UN.

Concerning race, you explain to me why Colin Powell is being ignored by members of his own party, and they refuse to listen to what he has to say on the Iranian agreement?

I am a liberal Democrat. That's funny, because I am voting for John Kasich in the 2016 Republican primary.

I do admire your support for the Republican party that opposes just about everything this president is for even though they were for it in the past. Obama is for it, then we are against it.

Originally Posted by Guest

Thank you so much for going out of your way to respond. There is so much to talk about the Iran deal, but instead of that you ask a question. Who answers a question with a question, a person that doesn't want to answer the initial question. That's who!

"They will do their own inspection of military site selected by them and get back to us." Where in the name of creation did you get that from? The IAEA will let them take their own samples as long as a IAEA inspector is there. That statement came for the head of the IAEA. I thought that you trusted the IAEA. The IAEA will be reporting their finding on the inspection by year end. They will have an inspection of all Iranian nuclear sites, and every suspected nuclear sites. The initial portion Iranian money will not be released until the IAEA is satisfied that Iran has meet the requirements under the agreement.

If we back out of the deal, then Iran doesn't have to cheat, because there is no deal. We are standing there alone with our thumps up our ass wondering what happened. You said all the other P5plus1 countries in the country have an economical reason to trade with Iran, and they are going to do it anyway. So, what the hell are we gaining by not accepting the deal? If Iran cheats, at least we have something to bring up with the UN.

Concerning race, you explain to me why Colin Powell is being ignored by members of his own party, and they refuse to listen to what he has to say on the Iranian agreement?

I am a liberal Democrat. That's funny, because I am voting for John Kasich in the 2016 Republican primary.

I do admire your support for the Republican party that opposes just about everything this president is for even though they were for it in the past. Obama is for it, then we are against it.

I really wish we could us the ignore feature in political.

Enjoy your dream world where Obama rules, and racist claims are the staple.

I, personally, am so sick of the race card..it is juvenile, unfounded and used when no other response is offered.

I, personally, am also sick of this administration who showed promise, but has lied and politicized any issue, including the race issue. They are not truthful, they tell half truths, but they got you to love them.

Have you read the manner in which this man garnered the votes for Iran deal ? Have you read how he got the votes for ACA ? And then, in addition, manipulated congress on both votes. Statesman, no...politician exclusively, yes.

I read with great interest the positive reviews on the various alternatives to ACA, especially the Rubio plan and can just hope because if the ACA continues, we are bankrupt.

You asked a question I must answer. You asked what the hell are we doing making this deal.....I agree.....the sanctions were working, got them to the table where we blew it. We have insured them a nuclear weapon, and insured we are stuck with this. This is disaster in a bottle.

Always this way with this resident....ACA....he said no alternative but forgot to ask. On Iran, he said only alternative is war...he made that up, and never asked and now with his politics has insured we will never get to even discuss alternatives.

Colin Powell, distinguished military leader, ought to be ashamed of himself for placing politics ahead of the security of this nation. Its been obvious for some time now that he is a man scorned.

It is surprising that we have so many "Mr, Magoo's" that even in the face of the most obvious evidence these Magoo's continue to support Obama. Iran just yesterday again, lamented "Death To America" and the Magoo's cheer on Obama's Iran Deal. Russia is going to arm Syria and Obama still has made up his mind about the red line he drew concerning Assad's use of chemical weapons

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Thank you so much for going out of your way to respond. There is so much to talk about the Iran deal, but instead of that you ask a question. Who answers a question with a question, a person that doesn't want to answer the initial question. That's who!

"They will do their own inspection of military site selected by them and get back to us." Where in the name of creation did you get that from? The IAEA will let them take their own samples as long as a IAEA inspector is there. That statement came for the head of the IAEA. I thought that you trusted the IAEA. The IAEA will be reporting their finding on the inspection by year end. They will have an inspection of all Iranian nuclear sites, and every suspected nuclear sites. The initial portion Iranian money will not be released until the IAEA is satisfied that Iran has meet the requirements under the agreement.

If we back out of the deal, then Iran doesn't have to cheat, because there is no deal. We are standing there alone with our thumps up our ass wondering what happened. You said all the other P5plus1 countries in the country have an economical reason to trade with Iran, and they are going to do it anyway. So, what the hell are we gaining by not accepting the deal? If Iran cheats, at least we have something to bring up with the UN.

Concerning race, you explain to me why Colin Powell is being ignored by members of his own party, and they refuse to listen to what he has to say on the Iranian agreement?

I am a liberal Democrat. That's funny, because I am voting for John Kasich in the 2016 Republican primary.

I do admire your support for the Republican party that opposes just about everything this president is for even though they were for it in the past. Obama is for it, then we are against it.

Among other things, you said “… I am a Liberal Democrat”

Now that was not hard to figure out, but thanks for making the obvious more obvious anyway.

As such, you have a number of beliefs that most people with common sense believe range between the peculiar to the genuinely idiotic, including allowing Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon. Nuclear warming indeed.

Being a liberal democrat also explains your self-hatred and American loathing world view. Every time you speak, we all see yet more evidence that liberalism is a non-curable form of mental illness

It appears someone else wants to negotiate and get sanctions removed.


"(CNN)In its latest bout of saber rattling, North Korea says it is ready to use nuclear weapons against the United States and other foes if they pursue "their reckless hostile policy" toward Kim Jong Un's regime.

Kim Jong Un's regime may already have 10 to 15 nuclear weapons, according to David Albright, a former U.N. weapons inspector who now heads the non-profit Institute for Science and International Security.

In a report in February, Albright predicted that Pyongyang could increase its stockpile to anywhere between 20 and roughly Kim Jong Un's regime may already have 10 to 15 nuclear weapons, according to David Albright, a former U.N. weapons inspector who now heads the non-profit Institute for Science and International Security.

In a report in February, Albright predicted that Pyongyang could increase its stockpile to anywhere between 20 and roughly 100 nuclear weapons by 2020.

The growing nuclear arsenal poses a serious strategic challenge for the United States.

The U.S. government has repeatedly called on North Korea to commit to denuclearization as a condition of any future negotiations, but Kim's regime has repeatedly dismissed such an idea, demanding to be recognized as a nuclear power."


North Korea issues nuclear warning to U.S., other foes - CNN.com

Originally Posted by Guest

It appears someone else wants to negotiate and get sanctions removed.


"(CNN)In its latest bout of saber rattling, North Korea says it is ready to use nuclear weapons against the United States and other foes if they pursue "their reckless hostile policy" toward Kim Jong Un's regime.

Kim Jong Un's regime may already have 10 to 15 nuclear weapons, according to David Albright, a former U.N. weapons inspector who now heads the non-profit Institute for Science and International Security.

In a report in February, Albright predicted that Pyongyang could increase its stockpile to anywhere between 20 and roughly Kim Jong Un's regime may already have 10 to 15 nuclear weapons, according to David Albright, a former U.N. weapons inspector who now heads the non-profit Institute for Science and International Security.

In a report in February, Albright predicted that Pyongyang could increase its stockpile to anywhere between 20 and roughly 100 nuclear weapons by 2020.

The growing nuclear arsenal poses a serious strategic challenge for the United States.

The U.S. government has repeatedly called on North Korea to commit to denuclearization as a condition of any future negotiations, but Kim's regime has repeatedly dismissed such an idea, demanding to be recognized as a nuclear power."


North Korea issues nuclear warning to U.S., other foes - CNN.com

It appears that Obie is working overtime to destroy us. IF Biden is stressed now, can you imagine what Obie will be handing him IF he was to get elected? Poor guy. As vulgar as Biden can get with his language, can you just vision his verbal vomit when he pictures what Obie is doing to him?

Originally Posted by Guest

It appears that Obie is working overtime to destroy us. IF Biden is stressed now, can you imagine what Obie will be handing him IF he was to get elected? Poor guy. As vulgar as Biden can get with his language, can you just vision his verbal vomit when he pictures what Obie is doing to him?

All I know is that the Iran deal has a bunch of side issues and this magnifies one of them. This is a country WITH nukes and sanctions.

Wait until the ME, and with Russia helping them all to nuke tecnology, etc how long before Syria joins this group.

We already know they have and will use gas and such weapons on their OWN people.

The ME is going to be well armed with nukes, hate for the US and an ally (Russia) seeking to get back its place on the stage.

Stand by

Originally Posted by Guest

Among other things, you said “… I am a Liberal Democrat”

Now that was not hard to figure out, but thanks for making the obvious more obvious anyway.

As such, you have a number of beliefs that most people with common sense believe range between the peculiar to the genuinely idiotic, including allowing Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon. Nuclear warming indeed.

Being a liberal democrat also explains your self-hatred and American loathing world view. Every time you speak, we all see yet more evidence that liberalism is a non-curable form of mental illness

You know what is obvious your total inability to spot sarcasm. You do excel in a common practice of all Republicans taking something out of context, and then running with it.

Try looking at the sentence that followed the liberal democrat comment. How do you explain the fact that I will be voting for John Kasich in the Florida primary? I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer.

If the US backed out of the deal, it was reported that Iran could develop a nuclear bomb in two months, and they have the material to produce it. So, I guess two months is a much longer period than 15 to 25 years. From your own first hand experience, you must be real familiar with mental illness. As far as common sense is concern, try getting some.

Originally Posted by Guest

Colin Powell, distinguished military leader, ought to be ashamed of himself for placing politics ahead of the security of this nation. Its been obvious for some time now that he is a man scorned.

It is surprising that we have so many "Mr, Magoo's" that even in the face of the most obvious evidence these Magoo's continue to support Obama. Iran just yesterday again, lamented "Death To America" and the Magoo's cheer on Obama's Iran Deal. Russia is going to arm Syria and Obama still has made up his mind about the red line he drew concerning Assad's use of chemical weapons

Personal Best Regards:

This post is total nonsense. Did you listen to his Meet The Press interview? There wasn't literally anything in there that had a hint of politics. Who scorned him?

Of course, the far right in Iran said "Death to America", that is what the far right in any country yells at all of their enemies. The far right in Iran is walking lock step with the Republicans in this country in hating this deal. Are you enjoying your company?

Originally Posted by Guest

This post is total nonsense. Did you listen to his Meet The Press interview? There wasn't literally anything in there that had a hint of politics. Who scorned him?

Of course, the far right in Iran said "Death to America", that is what the far right in any country yells at all of their enemies. The far right in Iran is walking lock step with the Republicans in this country in hating this deal. Are you enjoying your company?

Total BS. I suppose you think that the Wall St protesters were also Republicans?

Originally Posted by Guest

This post is total nonsense. Did you listen to his Meet The Press interview? There wasn't literally anything in there that had a hint of politics. Who scorned him?

Of course, the far right in Iran said "Death to America", that is what the far right in any country yells at all of their enemies. The far right in Iran is walking lock step with the Republicans in this country in hating this deal. Are you enjoying your company?

"The far right in Iran is walking lock step with the Republicans in this country in hating this deal"

THIS IS NOT ORIGINAL.

The President already said it at the same time as saying those who did not agree were the "crazies".

BUT you stole it from the highest office in the land.

Oh except that hard right in Iran is NOT opposed to the deal

They simply proclaim killing us. I suppose just a subtle difference

Originally Posted by Guest

This post is total nonsense. Did you listen to his Meet The Press interview? There wasn't literally anything in there that had a hint of politics. Who scorned him?

Of course, the far right in Iran said "Death to America", that is what the far right in any country yells at all of their enemies. The far right in Iran is walking lock step with the Republicans in this country in hating this deal. Are you enjoying your company?

"the far right," "the far right", "the far right" yadda

You sound like another unhinged liberal. In addition to making an idiotic, truly ignorant comparison between the "far right" in Iran (oxymoron) and conservatives (ie constitutional government ...you know, like the Founding Fathers bequeathed us) you appear to be sputtering and spitting when you talk.

Originally Posted by Guest

"the far right," "the far right", "the far right" yadda

You sound like another unhinged liberal. In addition to making an idiotic, truly ignorant comparison between the "far right" in Iran (oxymoron) and conservatives (ie constitutional government ...you know, like the Founding Fathers bequeathed us) you appear to be sputtering and spitting when you talk.

Originally Posted by Guest

You know what is obvious your total inability to spot sarcasm. You do excel in a common practice of all Republicans taking something out of context, and then running with it.

Try looking at the sentence that followed the liberal democrat comment. How do you explain the fact that I will be voting for John Kasich in the Florida primary? I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer.

If the US backed out of the deal, it was reported that Iran could develop a nuclear bomb in two months, and they have the material to produce it. So, I guess two months is a much longer period than 15 to 25 years. From your own first hand experience, you must be real familiar with mental illness. As far as common sense is concern, try getting some.

Look, it's clear your condition as a liberal is incurable. I'm sorry about that. In the meantime, speaking of common sense, see if you can detect any in this short video regarding the Iran deal.

Iran Side Effects