Why Hillary Clinton is Clearly Qualfied to be President

» Site Navigation
Home Page The Villages Maps The Villages Activities The Villages Clubs The Villages Book Healthcare Rentals Real Estate Section Classified Section The Villages Directory Home Improvement Site Guidelines Advertising Info Register Now Video Tutorials Frequently Asked Questions
» Newsletter Signup
» Premium Tower
» Advertisements
» Trending News
» Tower Sponsors




















» Premium Sponsors
» Banner Sponsors
» Advertisements
 
Thread Tools
  #211  
Old 04-20-2015, 09:47 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
As campaigns launch, poll finds GOP field stays tight - CNN.com


The difference is that Hillary Clinton beats all her GOP rivals by a minimum of 14 points, and the leading GOP candidate, Jeb Bush is only garnering 17% of the GOP vote. This new CNN has some very interesting numbers to chew on.
Same way she poled in 2008 before being bumped off by a virtual unknown, untested, unqualified, dark horse candidate.
  #212  
Old 04-20-2015, 09:50 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default We

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Just waiting. Let us hope the same is true of better democratic candidates.
Do have a couple more options for our dems. What about Joe Biden or especially loved Elizabeth Warren? Any of the three could easily beat all the GOP candidates including Romney. Y'all need to start looking for moderation and middle of the road candidates. Someone capable of negotiation and compromise!
  #213  
Old 04-20-2015, 10:19 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Polls are essentially useless this far out. Their sole purpose is to give talking heads something to blather about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
As campaigns launch, poll finds GOP field stays tight - CNN.com


The difference is that Hillary Clinton beats all her GOP rivals by a minimum of 14 points, and the leading GOP candidate, Jeb Bush is only garnering 17% of the GOP vote. This new CNN has some very interesting numbers to chew on.
  #214  
Old 04-20-2015, 11:01 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I think it is so sad that we have reduced the office of the President of the United States to issues such as gay rights, women's rights, who can give the most freebies out while in office, etc. Not to say that these are not important issues to discuss, but shouldn't the President have more pressing issues to deal with - like the safety of our country for one thing? Aren't leadership qualities and experience more important than ideology for a President? If the majority really does think as you do, I'm afraid we are in real trouble as a country.

Give me a real leader who has integrity, experience, and a willingness and ability to bring people together, and I will vote for him or her no matter what party!


This is too hysterical. All the GOP has done is focus on taking away a woman's right to choose, birth control choices, introduce vaginal probes, personhood amendments, religious freedom laws, and now that they are on the wrong side of all these issues, they are like boohoo, boohoo, talk about something else, anything else.

Republicans can't win a presidential election any more and can't repeal these court decisions, so they will just chip away at every law they don't agree with.

The safety of the country is probably not a winning issue for the
GOP either since 9/11 and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars happened on their watch.

They can't criticize the economy too much either, since the largest recession since the great depression happened on their watch.

How about repealing the ACA? Always a biggie for republicans? Nineteen million residents who now have health care, many for the first time, might disagree with you.
  #215  
Old 04-20-2015, 11:12 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Dying wish: Don't vote for Hillary Clinton - Katherine Borgerding - POLITICO


Another old white man can't stand the thought of a woman president, even from the grave.
  #216  
Old 04-20-2015, 11:12 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Do have a couple more options for our dems. What about Joe Biden or especially loved Elizabeth Warren? Any of the three could easily beat all the GOP candidates including Romney. Y'all need to start looking for moderation and middle of the road candidates. Someone capable of negotiation and compromise!
Just out of curiosity, in your fever swamp world, do you define Elizabeth Warren as a "moderate?"
  #217  
Old 04-20-2015, 11:15 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Dying wish: Don't vote for Hillary Clinton - Katherine Borgerding - POLITICO


Another old white man can't stand the thought of a woman president, even from the grave.
More predictable anti-white male racism and bigotry from the very font of tolerance from the soul of the leftist world view ... in other words, a sick puppy who needs help.
  #218  
Old 04-20-2015, 11:50 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Dying wish: Don't vote for Hillary Clinton - Katherine Borgerding - POLITICO


Another old white man can't stand the thought of a woman president, even from the grave.
A true activist...predictable.....always slashing out.....very narrow world
  #219  
Old 04-20-2015, 12:09 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Dying wish: Don't vote for Hillary Clinton - Katherine Borgerding - POLITICO


Another old white man can't stand the thought of a woman president, even from the grave.
Has it ever occurred to you, within your anti white male racist worldview, that perhaps this guy would love to see someone like Carly Fiorina elected, instead of the dishonest shrew Hillary Clinton?
  #220  
Old 04-20-2015, 12:16 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The New York Times and Fox News have each made arrangements for additional in depth reporting on new book which details the Clintons' apparently unquenchable thirst for gaining wealth and cash, even if it means perverting the honesty and integrity of the Office of Secretary of State to do it.

The book purports to show how donations to the Clinton Foundation and speaking fees paid to former president Bill Clinton may have influenced Hillary Clinton's decisions at the State Department.

This should be interesting. The detestable, evil and (fill in your favorite hate word) "Faux News" is one thing for liberal wackos to rail at. However, when the respectable, honest, totally unbiased and often morally superior New York Times gets in bed with the same source being used by Fox ...well that could cause liberals' heads to literally explode.

Thus, I request that all liberal TOTV members please use caution when reading the link from Politico.

New York Times, Fox News strike deals for anti-Clinton research - POLITICO.com
  #221  
Old 04-20-2015, 12:20 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
This is too hysterical. All the GOP has done is focus on taking away a woman's right to choose, birth control choices, introduce vaginal probes, personhood amendments, religious freedom laws, and now that they are on the wrong side of all these issues, they are like boohoo, boohoo, talk about something else, anything else.

Republicans can't win a presidential election any more and can't repeal these court decisions, so they will just chip away at every law they don't agree with.

The safety of the country is probably not a winning issue for the
GOP either since 9/11 and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars happened on their watch.

They can't criticize the economy too much either, since the largest recession since the great depression happened on their watch.

How about repealing the ACA? Always a biggie for republicans? Nineteen million residents who now have health care, many for the first time, might disagree with you.
I'm glad you found the post hysterical. What I find amusing is that in all of your ranting above, you missed the entire point of the post that you chose to criticize.
  #222  
Old 04-20-2015, 12:56 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Has it ever occurred to you, within your anti white male racist worldview, that perhaps this guy would love to see someone like Carly Fiorina elected, instead of the dishonest shrew Hillary Clinton?
Ah now doesn't that take the wind out out the arm waving mill of feminism?
I can't wait to see how it gets spun to suit the coming rant we all know will come.
  #223  
Old 04-20-2015, 02:09 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
The New York Times and Fox News have each made arrangements for additional in depth reporting on new book which details the Clintons' apparently unquenchable thirst for gaining wealth and cash, even if it means perverting the honesty and integrity of the Office of Secretary of State to do it.

The book purports to show how donations to the Clinton Foundation and speaking fees paid to former president Bill Clinton may have influenced Hillary Clinton's decisions at the State Department.

This should be interesting. The detestable, evil and (fill in your favorite hate word) "Faux News" is one thing for liberal wackos to rail at. However, when the respectable, honest, totally unbiased and often morally superior New York Times gets in bed with the same source being used by Fox ...well that could cause liberals' heads to literally explode.

Thus, I request that all liberal TOTV members please use caution when reading the link from Politico.

New York Times, Fox News strike deals for anti-Clinton research - POLITICO.com
Murdoch Empire Colludes With 'Liberal Media' To Promote 'Clinton Cash' - The National Memo


Women of America Unite...We are not going back.
  #224  
Old 04-20-2015, 02:25 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
You know for someone who discounts biased sources such as "faux News" etc, why would you even bother to cite the left wing partisan rag you did in your post?

In any event, it's amusing to to hear an updated IWW ( ie Wobblies) slogan and let us know women "are not going back" My guess is any woman dumb enough to buy that line are in no imminent danger of that ever happening anyway ... no sane man would want them
  #225  
Old 04-20-2015, 02:41 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/20..._r=0&referrer=

This story from the New York Times is depressing tale of greed and corruption .... I wonder how the smartest woman in the world could be dumb enough to do this ?
 

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.