Why Hillary Clinton is Clearly Qualfied to be President

» Site Navigation
Home Page The Villages Maps The Villages Activities The Villages Clubs The Villages Book Healthcare Rentals Real Estate Section Classified Section The Villages Directory Home Improvement Site Guidelines Advertising Info Register Now Video Tutorials Frequently Asked Questions
» Newsletter Signup
» Premium Tower
» Advertisements
» Trending News
» Tower Sponsors




















» Premium Sponsors
» Banner Sponsors
» Advertisements
 
Thread Tools
  #241  
Old 04-22-2015, 01:21 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Only in the vein of BHO is Hillary qualified. She's a lier, is deceitful, self absorbed, has very poor moral values and no ethics. So if this is the type of person you think is qualified to run for president, then that explains how BHO was elected twice.
  #242  
Old 04-22-2015, 02:10 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Only in the vein of BHO is Hillary qualified. She's a lier, is deceitful, self absorbed, has very poor moral values and no ethics. So if this is the type of person you think is qualified to run for president, then that explains how BHO was elected twice.


  #243  
Old 04-22-2015, 02:13 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm Several posters have said Ruibo Cruz, et al will reduce social security but Clinton said she is going to protect social security.
The perative"word is "said" Social security was enacted in 1934 and despite publicity to the contrary FDR was forced to agree to social security because of the usual extortion that goes on between the two parties. Politicians have been kicking this can (social security) down the road since then as it plays nicely to the masses. Folks this thread is sounding more and more like "my father can beat your father up"

Maybe it needs a rest?


Personal Best Regards:
  #244  
Old 04-22-2015, 04:48 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[QUOTE=Guest;1049531]Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm Several posters have said Ruibo Cruz, et al will reduce social security but Clinton said she is going to protect social security.
--------

No, it is NOT the posters who have said that some of the Republican candidates will reduce Social Security retirement benefits. It has been said by THE Republican candidates themselves.

Personally, I am in favor of means testing for Social Security retirement benefits. If a retired person has enough savings and investments, they should not get the full amount of retirement and have it based on a sliding scale from a small reduction to full reduction.

Yes, everyone would still be forced to pay into SS and Medicare.
  #245  
Old 04-22-2015, 05:13 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
This is the biggest bunch of BS yet. Secret Service agents don't get to choose who they want to protect based on politics or personality. They either do the job they were hired to do or find other employment.
I`m the guy that wrote what you called B.S. I stand by what I said . This SS Agent was able to transfer to a different assignment which did not involve the First Family .
People forget that the SS is part of the US Treasury Department . Many SS Agents investigate securities and currency fraud .
  #246  
Old 04-22-2015, 05:13 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[quote=Guest;1049649]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm Several posters have said Ruibo Cruz, et al will reduce social security but Clinton said she is going to protect social security.
--------

No, it is NOT the posters who have said that some of the Republican candidates will reduce Social Security retirement benefits. It has been said by THE Republican candidates themselves.

Personally, I am in favor of means testing for Social Security retirement benefits. If a retired person has enough savings and investments, they should not get the full amount of retirement and have it based on a sliding scale from a small reduction to full reduction.

Yes, everyone would still be forced to pay into SS and Medicare.
So, how much of your Social Security are you willing to give up?
  #247  
Old 04-22-2015, 05:17 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

For those who are enthusiastic backers of Sec. Clinton for President . Please explain to us what you believe she will acomplish if she becomes the CEO of the USA .
I think that it would be insightful .
  #248  
Old 04-22-2015, 05:22 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[quote=Guest;1049669]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post

So, how much of your Social Security are you willing to give up?
All of it. I current donate all of my Social Security to charity. I would continue to do that amount even if I did not receive Social Security.

So, how much of your Social Security are YOU willing to give up?
  #249  
Old 04-22-2015, 05:25 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[quote=Guest;1049649]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Personally, I am in favor of means testing for Social Security retirement benefits. If a retired person has enough savings and investments, they should not get the full amount of retirement and have it based on a sliding scale from a small reduction to full reduction.

Yes, everyone would still be forced to pay into SS and Medicare.
Thanks for being honest ... and spoken like the true Socialist you are. You guys love to "force" people to do things as a general rule.
  #250  
Old 04-22-2015, 05:28 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
For those who are enthusiastic backers of Sec. Clinton for President . Please explain to us what you believe she will acomplish if she becomes the CEO of the USA .
I think that it would be insightful .
Actually, and better still, request some Rodham-Clinton supporter contrast her ACCOMPLISHMENTS with those of Carly Fiorina ... who really was a CEO. (worked her way up from secretary)

http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Carly_Fiorina.aspx
  #251  
Old 04-22-2015, 05:36 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[quote=Guest;1049681]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post

All of it. I current donate all of my Social Security to charity. I would continue to do that amount even if I did not receive Social Security.

So, how much of your Social Security are YOU willing to give up?
First let me say that the means testing and income redistribution was your proposal not mine. With that said, it is unlikely that I will ever receive any Social Security benefits. I sold a multi-million dollar business (sorry, Obama but I did build it) a few years ago and will not be eligible for full benefits for nearly 20 years. With means testing as you propose, I will no doubt forfeit all of it. So, to answer your question all of it.
  #252  
Old 04-22-2015, 05:41 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hillary Fat Cat Clinton is a source of continuing entertainment.

Her willingness to pander to any group, and say ANYTHING to get elected knows no boundaries. The most recent evidence of this is her pledge to topple the top 1% !! Unreal!!

Hillary Clinton Calls For 'Toppling' The 1 Percent

First of all, shes now worth $150 million so shes in the top one tenth of the one percent. Words are beginning to fail me regarding her hypocrisy.

Second, shes never had a real job her wealth has come solely from her and Bills political careers, and most recently, in effect selling influence for future access.

Third, all of her buddies and friends are the top 1% so I doubt she will screw them (although who knows?)

Fourth, theres no doubt there is a huge pool of resentful liberals with untapped sources of inner rage to whom this patently transparent appeal will resonate.

What a total joke this woman has become. Thats not to say the large number of dumbasses in this country wont elect her, just as they did with Obama, but her fakery is apparently unlimited.
  #253  
Old 04-22-2015, 05:44 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[quote=Guest;1049686]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post

Thanks for being honest ... and spoken like the true Socialist you are. You guys love to "force" people to do things as a general rule.
Socialist or Progressive? I have no problem with being called either one.

As far as forcing people to continue paying into Social Security and Medicare - just consider it a tax. We are "forced" into paying a school tax even though we have no school kids anymore, aren't we?
  #254  
Old 04-22-2015, 08:23 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Interesting news developing,,,,,

"...one of the biggest benefactors to the Clinton Foundation has been trading with Iran and may be in breach of US sanctions imposed on the country."

No big deal, right ?

http://www.newsweek.com/2015/04/24/h...de-322253.html
  #255  
Old 04-22-2015, 09:43 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So much chatter on here about Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation. How many people actually know the purpose of the Clinton Foundation? I suggest you actually research the topic BEFORE writing your pathetic posts. You will find it is a charitable foundation that has helped milliions of people around the world. Of course, to most of the right wing nuts - and gang of 6 - helping people is not what they are about.
 

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.