Originally Posted by Guest

I love most people believe Hillary to be dishonest yet the Republicans haven't told the truth about anything this whole election!! Not one of them is credible. I shiver to think of one of the Republicans with the Nuke codes in their hands!!

you are intimating you are comfortable with Clinton having the nuclear codes????????

You have just categorized yourself of a lot more than being uninformed....and out of politeness and shock will comment no further.

Originally Posted by Guest

I love most people believe Hillary to be dishonest yet the Republicans haven't told the truth about anything this whole election!! Not one of them is credible. I shiver to think of one of the Republicans with the Nuke codes in their hands!!

Telling the truth is a valid point. That aside, how about jeopardizing national security by transmitting and receiving on an unsecured computer, classified information? How about the mishandling of classified information, allowing uncleared personnel access to it while they maintained her equipment? How about the illegal and improper destruction of that classified information? How about tax fraud? How about applying for a leadership position, president, and yet abandoned men in Libya to be slaughtered? And even though you don't believe it is a sin to lie about it, tell the victim's family an outright and deliberate lie as to how they died, by blaming it on a video that only had less than 400 views? How about lying under oath? Just a few of the many issues that I find unacceptable. So, do any of the Republicans compare in equal complicity?

Realize before answering, IF you haven't run away by now, that any answer you give defending her will probably be laughed at or receive replies of a derisive nature.

Other than the fact that you do not wish to vote Republican, you have not given a legitimate reason for your vote. Having the Clinton last name or that she is a woman (debatable) is hardly a valid or common sense reason for giving her your very important vote. You seem to have some semblance of an education if you are able to read and respond on here, so I am puzzled at the implied ignorance you project regarding your political choice. Emotions can elicit radical actions, of course.

Originally Posted by Guest

Telling the truth is a valid point. That aside, how about jeopardizing national security by transmitting and receiving on an unsecured computer, classified information? How about the mishandling of classified information, allowing uncleared personnel access to it while they maintained her equipment? How about the illegal and improper destruction of that classified information? How about tax fraud? How about applying for a leadership position, president, and yet abandoned men in Libya to be slaughtered? And even though you don't believe it is a sin to lie about it, tell the victim's family an outright and deliberate lie as to how they died, by blaming it on a video that only had less than 400 views? How about lying under oath? Just a few of the many issues that I find unacceptable. So, do any of the Republicans compare in equal complicity?

Realize before answering, IF you haven't run away by now, that any answer you give defending her will probably be laughed at or receive replies of a derisive nature.

Other than the fact that you do not wish to vote Republican, you have not given a legitimate reason for your vote. Having the Clinton last name or that she is a woman (debatable) is hardly a valid or common sense reason for giving her your very important vote. You seem to have some semblance of an education if you are able to read and respond on here, so I am puzzled at the implied ignorance you project regarding your political choice. Emotions can elicit radical actions, of course.

There is a 'D' after their name and that is all that counts...good, bad, crooked, criminal, liar, cheat, unethical, dishonest, etc.......does not matter!

That is how we got Obama. And many more of the "d" names will not be fooled the third time.

Calm down and take your meds.

Originally Posted by Guest

I love most people believe Hillary to be dishonest yet the Republicans haven't told the truth about anything this whole election!! Not one of them is credible. I shiver to think of one of the Republicans with the Nuke codes in their hands!!

Bottom line. Anyone under investigation by the FBI is too dangerous to be President. She's just another Obama. If you like living with terrorism then yes vote for Hillary.

Originally Posted by Guest

Bottom line. Anyone under investigation by the FBI is too dangerous to be President. She's just another Obama. If you like living with terrorism then yes vote for Hillary.

I agree. The FBI is owned by Obama so if they are investigating Hillary, then she can't blame the GOP, unless she feels that she was ratted out by the GOP. In that case, she shouldn't have made so many enemies. Shoot, a few years ago, her own party didn't want anything to do with her. Then when she became SecState they all clambered to kiss her posterior. Everyone knows that the Clintons are despicable criminals. Heck, she even said they were broke when they left the White House, and that's probably why they stole thousands of bucks worth of property when they snuck out. I wouldn't trust either one of them with the restroom keycard, let alone with national security and the treasury checkbook.

I remember when she said she came under enemy sniper fire in the Bosnia airport and then said oh shucks I just misspoke..I remember her calling Monica Lewinsky a narcissistic loony toon.. How about, I did NOT delete work related emails only personal ones.. What are they at about 30,000 recovered so far? My favorite though, I did not send or receive classified emails on my private server, well ok maybe they're marked classified now but NOT when I sent them..Madame Secretary you want to be the Top Boss on the planet but you don't have enough common sense to assume that most likely ALL work related emails should be considered top secret, you know, just in case you're being hacked.. If she God forbid should become President how in the heck can she ALSO control a private foundation that accepts millions in wink wink "donations from foreign governments and it NOT be considered a conflict of interest even if it's Bill or Chelsea running it?? Lordy, Lordy 4 years of hearing that laugh would be unbearable....

Since, Hillary was very active in Bill's presidency, so far no one has publicly asked if this would not be a third term for the Clintons-WHICH WOULD BE ILLEGAL.

Qualifications-Bill now knows what sex is AND HE NOW KNOWS WHERE TO STAIN A DRESS IN THE WHITE HOUSE WITH NO PICTURES. We can count on this team to show us TRUTH? HONOR? MORAL LEADERSHIP?

If you think about it having Bill in the White House isn't all that bad. We did have peace and prosperity those years, and isn't that what we're all looking for? Everybody on here seems to complain about Obama and Bush 43 but not William Jefferson.
.

Originally Posted by Guest

If you think about it having Bill in the White House isn't all that bad. We did have peace and prosperity those years, and isn't that what we're all looking for? Everybody on here seems to complain about Obama and Bush 43 but not William Jefferson.
.

That's a naive statement, no offense Chi.