Originally Posted by Guest

Now, that is just hilarious. Tooo Funny! She is just as bad a disgraces as Obama, and that's saying something. She has done NOTHING good or accomplished NOTHING in service to America. At the very least Trump has created thousands of jobs. I don't personally care for Trump but I would not even think twice about voting for him over Clinton (either one of them) if the only choice was between Trump and Clinton. Clinton is despicable to put it mildly. The Clintons hate the military so why would they wish to be in command of them? Nope, my wish is for her to get what should be coming to her, jail time. She deserves to go to jail for jeopardizing national security and being culpable in the Benghazi cover up of the death of our patriots.

What is amusing is that in a battle of wits with Hillary you'd be runner up.

Originally Posted by Guest

What is amusing is that in a battle of wits with Hillary you'd be runner up.

Ahh, but I'm not running for president. Unfortunately, she is.

Originally Posted by Guest

Ahh, but I'm not running for president. Unfortunately, she is.

...and all the polls say Mrs. Clinton would beat any Republican.

Originally Posted by Guest

...and all the polls say Mrs. Clinton would beat any Republican.

And when one only looks in the mirror all they see is _ ? _.

And using wit in the same sentence with Clinton is in itself another pretense!

Originally Posted by Guest

...and all the polls say Mrs. Clinton would beat any Republican.

I guess it depends on which polls you are looking at, because I have seen polls where every Republican beats her in the election, except possibly Fiorina. And Fiorina is even in the polls with her. As we all know, polls are not accurate predictions of election results. Besides, polls can't account for Shrillary being arrested by the FBI.

Originally Posted by Guest

...and all the polls say Mrs. Clinton would beat any Republican.

True. The latest polls show Clinton with a sizable lead. The only poll that shows the Trump being ahead is the one by Fox knows dated 11/16 -11/19.

Carson has dipped precipitously in the polls among the Republican candidates. It appears he can't even manage his own campaign much less manage the country. The Republican Party wishes Trump weren't even in existence, and he's is of course talking about a third-party Canada see if necessary which would certainly be a nail in the coffin for any Republican presidential helps.

Originally Posted by Guest

True. The latest polls show Clinton with a sizable lead. The only poll that shows the Trump being ahead is the one by Fox knows dated 11/16 -11/19.

Carson has dipped precipitously in the polls among the Republican candidates. It appears he can't even manage his own campaign much less manage the country. The Republican Party wishes Trump weren't even in existence, and he's is of course talking about a third-party Canada see if necessary which would certainly be a nail in the coffin for any Republican presidential helps.

Spell check not working. He is of course, talking about a third-party candidacy which would be a nail in the coffin for any Republican presidential hopes.

Originally Posted by Guest

Spell check not working. He is of course, talking about a third-party candidacy which would be a nail in the coffin for any Republican presidential hopes.

That would require an assumption that all democrats, 100% will or would have voted for Clinton, which we know and can only be proven at the ballot box.

Because there are so many democrats that think America is not going in the right direction and are not ready to be fooled a third time....and if they like Trump.....just like many republicans will follow Trump. What none of us KNOW is will there be enough to offset whoever votes for the republican party.

However the direction, we know some of you loyalists both R & especially the D's will following and salute whoevr wears the appropriate letter after their name.....no matter what.

PS notice how low profile the Clinton campaign remains compared to Trump, Cruz and Rubio. It is easier to follow then counterpoint and much easier to not present a target!!!

Another reason to vote for Hillary. When wrong (often) she can be excused because of her "often confused" state.

Huma: Hillary 'Often Confused' | The Weekly Standard

Originally Posted by Guest

Another reason to vote for Hillary. When wrong (often) she can be excused because of her "often confused" state.

Huma: Hillary 'Often Confused' | The Weekly Standard

Well, she did bump her head, you know.

The Dems make excuses for Obama because he is black. Republicans don't allow them to use the race card to excuse his ineptitude. SO, I guess the Dems will excuse Shrillary because she is a woman. That wouldn't happen in the Republican party. Everyone is equal with us. And they can equally fail with us, also. Call it racist if you wish, but that's just fact. It was evident from the start when Reid stated that Obama could speak good "white."

Why Hillary should be president?

She shouldn't. There are too many other, better folks out there that would do a better job. An honorable job. Even in the Democrat party. Even Biden would be a better representative of the left.

Bill Clinton left the US with a surplus. The national debt spiraled during the Bush/Cheney years.

Originally Posted by Guest

Bill Clinton left the US with a surplus. The national debt spiraled during the Bush/Cheney years.

Another myth.

The ONLY president to EVER have a surplus was Eisenhower.
Clinton's budget surplus was his "proposed" spending budget for the following year during Bush's term. A budget is a proposal to spend within certain limits. Obama claims he reduced the budget deficit. That means, he reduced how much they planned to spend. Neither Clinton or Obama spent less than the tax received revenues.

You liberals claim that Obama's term did not start until after the fiscal year 9/30/2009 and that Bush was responsible for the debt up to that point. Well, that means that Clinton was responsible for the debt into Bush's firs year and did NOT have a surplus. If there was a surplus in revenues, then the national debt would have been paid down, and we all know that the national debt has never been paid down since President Eisenhower.

Originally Posted by Guest

Bill Clinton left the US with a surplus. The national debt spiraled during the Bush/Cheney years.

Bush had billion dollar deficits and Obama has averaged trillion dollar deficits. But, keep blaming Bush.

Originally Posted by Guest

Bush had billion dollar deficits and Obama has averaged trillion dollar deficits. But, keep blaming Bush.

Much easier to say Crapweasel than Bush.