Originally Posted by Guest

Workers have not seen increases in wages in the last 20 years which coincides somewhat what the creation of The Village raising your child. The reality is that we pushed married women into the workforce at an alarming rate and employers took full of advantage of this. The concept of supply and demand works 100% of the time so the more workers the lower the salaries. As costs began to rise out pacing wages, the mantra became that we need two people to carry the load which in essence was an accurate statement. However had not two members of the family been working, there would've been fewer workers and higher salaries, perhaps as much as 50% higher. Add this It is to lower tax brackets and lower taxes and no need for expensive childcare etc. and we would have been better off in the system that worked for a hundred years where one family member stayed home to raise the family and not be put in the Village Day Care where you drop your kids off to be handled ( not nurtured) by some of the lowest paid workers in Society where turnover rates are horrific.

Women's liberation has been a disaster for our country and the financial effects are still being felt. You notice the word Liberation is no longer used since no one was liberated while kids are in prison like Day Care away from their mothers.

Supporters of Women's Liberation were saying they wanted equal rights not special rights however they are continually demanding special rights such as the cost of raising children (FREE PRE K, DAY CARE, AFTER SCHOOL, ETC.)has been transferred to all taxpayers especially seniors, instead of remaining with the family.

How ironic is it that the only mothers you see taking care of their children are those immigrant women who are having loads of kids supported by government largess while The modern woman is limiting the number of children she has and at the age of three months turns them over to someone else to race.

Back to the topic, the effects of women's liberation on our society. I couldn't agree with you more. As a woman, and an educated professional in case the other side of this argument wants to slam my intelligence, I applaud you for putting into words what I have believed for a very long time. The women in my family who had to work for whatever reason, found other ways to do so without putting the children in daycare. Many others sacrificed the extra luxuries in life to stay home with their children, even though they themselves were educated professionals. Too many people want their cake and eat it too. They are not willing to sacrifice and live within their means to be more available during their children's formative years. I have seen the results of both ways over the years and the difference in most of the children is astounding.

Originally Posted by Guest

Back to the topic, the effects of women's liberation on our society. I couldn't agree with you more. As a woman, and an educated professional in case the other side of this argument wants to slam my intelligence, I applaud you for putting into words what I have believed for a very long time. The women in my family who had to work for whatever reason, found other ways to do so without putting the children in daycare. Many others sacrificed the extra luxuries in life to stay home with their children, even though they themselves were educated professionals. Too many people want their cake and eat it too. They are not willing to sacrifice and live within their means to be more available during their children's formative years. I have seen the results of both ways over the years and the difference in most of the children is astounding.

It's nice to have options.

Originally Posted by Guest

Back to the topic, the effects of women's liberation on our society. I couldn't agree with you more. As a woman, and an educated professional in case the other side of this argument wants to slam my intelligence, I applaud you for putting into words what I have believed for a very long time. The women in my family who had to work for whatever reason, found other ways to do so without putting the children in daycare. Many others sacrificed the extra luxuries in life to stay home with their children, even though they themselves were educated professionals. Too many people want their cake and eat it too. They are not willing to sacrifice and live within their means to be more available during their children's formative years. I have seen the results of both ways over the years and the difference in most of the children is astounding.

Excellent post!

Originally Posted by Guest

Excellent post!

Tonight I will leave the laptop on all night just to tire out your arms and hands. You won't smiling tomorrow.

Originally Posted by Guest

It's nice to have options.

I wonder how you became a professional if somebody didn't liberate women sometime in the past. Did you become a professional because you had to or wanted to?

Originally Posted by Guest

I wonder how you became a professional if somebody didn't liberate women sometime in the past. Did you become a professional because you had to or wanted to?

What were they "liberated" from ?

Originally Posted by Guest

You forgot in your lecture we should never have abolished slavery, bigot.

Actually I am a Republican. It was the Democrats, the Official Party of Slavery,who fought against abolishing slavery and a Republican President Lincoln who abolished Slavery although some Plantations still exist in places like Chicago and Baltimore where the slaves do the bidding of the Democrats but their lives never improve.Hillary will continues that process and enslave enliven more people.

Originally Posted by Guest

What were they "liberated" from ?

Let's be clear. The Woman's Liberation Movement liberated mo one any that is why you don't even hear the term anymore.

Originally Posted by Guest

Back to the topic, the effects of women's liberation on our society. I couldn't agree with you more. As a woman, and an educated professional in case the other side of this argument wants to slam my intelligence, I applaud you for putting into words what I have believed for a very long time. The women in my family who had to work for whatever reason, found other ways to do so without putting the children in daycare. Many others sacrificed the extra luxuries in life to stay home with their children, even though they themselves were educated professionals. Too many people want their cake and eat it too. They are not willing to sacrifice and live within their means to be more available during their children's formative years. I have seen the results of both ways over the years and the difference in most of the children is astounding.

I agree completely.myou can always spit the Day Care kids, hanging on to their mothers because they miss the nutpryuring process onky a mother can give. Sure there are option? But they do bring different results.

Originally Posted by Guest

I wonder how you became a professional if somebody didn't liberate women sometime in the past. Did you become a professional because you had to or wanted to?

BINGO!

The Queen 'B' isn't bright enough to figure out the hypocrisy in her post.

As to the person who wrote the ignorant nonsense about wages and women in the workforce, I guess they don't realize that about 70% of our economy is based on consumer consumption.

US GDP is 70 Percent Personal Consumption: Inside the Numbers | Mic

It seems most people understand, personal consumption drives the American economy. Personal consumption historically represents 70% of our nation’s GDP.

Anyone with half a brain can understand that the two-person working family, has more income and is therefore a bigger driver of our economy.

Stating that wages would be as much as 50% higher had only males stayed in the workforce, is about as dumb as one can get.

What next, go back to women being basically chattel?

And while having the ability to keep one person home with children (even if they weren't forced to due to personal issues ) is good for some, providing a better lifestyle and standard of living for your family is also good for some.

At least women (like my wife) now have that choice...which wasn't available to previous generations of females.

Seeing ANY woman complain about 'Women's Liberation' not only astounds me, but also tells me that she isn't that smart...regardless of what education she may have.





CNM

Originally Posted by Guest

What were they "liberated" from ?

Institutional misogyny.





CNM

Originally Posted by Guest

Let's be clear. The Woman's Liberation Movement liberated mo one any that is why you don't even hear the term anymore.

The part of the women's lib movement I enjoyed was when they liberated their bras. I am sure that made them feel very liberated. Being young at the time, I didn't mind it at all. Now, if only the women in The Villages would put theirs back on.............

Originally Posted by Guest

Institutional misogyny.





CNM

It was all in their minds.

Originally Posted by Guest

BINGO!

The Queen 'B' isn't bright enough to figure out the hypocrisy in her post.

As to the person who wrote the ignorant nonsense about wages and women in the workforce, I guess they don't realize that about 70% of our economy is based on consumer consumption.

US GDP is 70 Percent Personal Consumption: Inside the Numbers | Mic
double every 1; years


Anyone with half a brain can understand that the two-person working family, has more income and is therefore a bigger driver of our economy.

Stating that wages would be as much as 50% higher had only males stayed in the workforce, is about as dumb as one can get.

What next, go back to women being basically chattel?

And while having the ability to keep one person home with children (even if they weren't forced to due to personal issues ) is good for some, providing a better lifestyle and standard of living for your family is also good for some.

At least women (like my wife) now have that choice...which wasn't available to previous generations of females.

Seeing ANY woman complain about 'Women's Liberation' not only astounds me, but also tells me that she isn't that smart...regardless of what education she may have.





CNM

Read the entire post. . Wages have stagnated because of the lack of growth. Under Obama we have less than 2% growth. In order for wages to grow in any meaningful way we need 4% growth but this will not happen on the Obama and it won't happen if Hillary is elected, considering the high taxes placed on small and large businesses and regulation after regulation. The las 8 years were disasterous. If you want more of the same then vote for Hillary. It's that simple really

To the OP,

No, Obama was an example of a failed experiment. Women getting their due was just part of the evolution of a Free Country, AMERICA. Same as blacks getting their freedom and equal rights. But, there is no reason for either to blame all men or all whites. If not for those men and those whites, neither would have happened. And no, I am not that racist that spouts all that bigoted cr@p, which is his right to do.