[sounding]

Originally Posted by JMintzer

Not to mention, that the "97% of scientists" claim is horse hockey.

That number came from a study that reviewed papers that simply "mentioned" man made climate change in their paper. Not a study that those scientists agreed with the findings...

JM is correct. References to the 97% number is no different than a reference to consensus; but even Einstein had his fill of that trickery with his famous quote ... "Genius abhors consensus because when consensus is reached, thinking stops."

[tophcfa]

What other profession can you be consistently wrong at, and keep your job, besides being a weather person or an ER doctor at the former Villages Hospital?

[Taltarzac725]

Originally Posted by tophcfa

What other profession can you be consistently wrong at, and keep your job, besides being a weather person or an ER doctor at the former Villages Hospital?

I read a number of journal articles on the physics of predicting weather back in the early 1980s. There were many variables involved. Easier now with super computers but still a lot is unknown especially relating to ancient weather patterns. There is little to go on.

And global warming puts a new spin on many weather patterns.

[Two Bills]

My arthritis is a better predictor of the weather than our weather forecasters.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

Global warming deniers are hardly thinkers. Usually followers of whatever BS is on Fox News.

Really? In reality, they are they only thinkers---rejecting the brainwashing agenda of the powers that be and refusing to fall into line like the sheeple who have descended from the Scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz.

[sounding]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

Global warming deniers are hardly thinkers. Usually followers of whatever BS is on Fox News.

Thinking is fun, but data is better -- there is no data proving CO2 harms our climate.

[crash]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

What makes little sense to me is the assertion that this is just thousand or ten thousand year climate patterns while we now in 2024 suffer all kinds of weather calamities. Why not now in 2024 try to do something about the weather in the next ten to thirty years rather than waiting for Mother Nature to correct herself in ten thousand years?

Unless I am mistaken there was no one around when the earth was 14 degrees hotter to record the temperature is that a coincidence. The article was speaking on recorded human history and it was the hottest in that time frame.

We have no control over the Tonga volcano or sun spots amongst many issues but we can mitigate co2 emissions. If we wait until the deniers are convinced they are wrong it will be too late. Sort of reminds me of the people in intensive care with Covid saying it is real I wish I had got the vaccine.

[crash]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

Really? In reality, they are they only thinkers---rejecting the brainwashing agenda of the powers that be and refusing to fall into line like the sheeple who have descended from the Scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz.

They fall into the earth is flat camp people still believe that also but at least it won’t kill them.

Originally Posted by sounding

We can't change the climate, no less the weather. We've spent many years and millions of dollars trying to weaken hurricanes - with no results. Same goes for hail and rain ... which some say there are results - but there's no proof - just claims. Plus ... there's nothing for Mother Nature to correct, because there's no climate emergency.

Half correct. They can and are changing the weather. They can and are "dimming the sun" which is having negative impact on the temperature of the earth as well as creating massive changes weather conditions. They are creating new terminology to convince the world the new weather conditions are normal.

One year ago this mandate was created to report on the progress and outcomes of years of weather engineering that is promoting artificial climate change YET, at initial review of its objective attempts to say it is not occuring. This mandate calls for international support as well.

Click link at bottom of site. Download the pdf mandate and go to page 14 to see exactly what they are doing. This is a direct link to the Whitehouse .gov site. At least 9 companies are currently participating in weather engineering.

The flood in Dubai was caused by cloud seeding. They are now growing grass in the deserts. CA recently had floods because of cloud seeding. HAARP is creating weather patterns. "Heat" domes are our newest oddities. The list grows everyday.


Congressionally-Mandated Report on Solar Radiation Modification | OSTP | The White House

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by crash

Unless I am mistaken there was no one around when the earth was 14 degrees hotter to record the temperature is that a coincidence. The article was speaking on recorded human history and it was the hottest in that time frame.

We have no control over the Tonga volcano or sun spots amongst many issues but we can mitigate co2 emissions. If we wait until the deniers are convinced they are wrong it will be too late. Sort of reminds me of the people in intensive care with Covid saying it is real I wish I had got the vaccine.

We can, at a Paris accord total of $168 TRILLION. And if we can accomplish that goal, we have done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to very little to "combat" climate change. CO2 is NOT the problem. I think everyone was indoctrinating into thinking that Venus is hot because of clouds of CO2. That's not the story there, and it certainly is not true here. Yet, if I was in a position to grab some percentage of that $168 TRILLION, I'd be sure to coerce climatologists into stating "global warming" is manmade and imminent----easy, since most either work for the government or universities. I'd be sure to make the media complicit in spreading one of the biggest lies and scams ever perpetrated on the public---just tune into local weather and watch them tout "triple digit heat indices"----news flash---the heat index is ALWAYS triple digit in Florida in the summer. And I'd be sure to donate to the "correct" politicians so I could control them. Who was it that coined the term "useful idiots"????

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by crash

They fall into the earth is flat camp people still believe that also but at least it won’t kill them.

You are correct. Those who are gullible enough to believe these self-appointed climate change gurus probably believe the Earth is flat as well, while waiting for Santa Claus to slide down the chimney

[sounding]

Originally Posted by crash

Unless I am mistaken there was no one around when the earth was 14 degrees hotter to record the temperature is that a coincidence. The article was speaking on recorded human history and it was the hottest in that time frame.

We have no control over the Tonga volcano or sun spots amongst many issues but we can mitigate co2 emissions. If we wait until the deniers are convinced they are wrong it will be too late. Sort of reminds me of the people in intensive care with Covid saying it is real I wish I had got the vaccine.

Mitigating CO2 is anti-life, because CO2 is plant food ... less CO2 = less life. More importantly, no one has any proof CO2 harms our climate.

[Bay Kid]

Originally Posted by sounding

We can't change the climate, no less the weather. We've spent many years and millions of dollars trying to weaken hurricanes - with no results. Same goes for hail and rain ... which some say there are results - but there's no proof - just claims. Plus ... there's nothing for Mother Nature to correct, because there's no climate emergency.

There is only 1 person that can change the climate and it doesn't cost a penny.

[lwmilo]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

What makes little sense to me is the assertion that this is just thousand or ten thousand year climate patterns while we now in 2024 suffer all kinds of weather calamities. Why not now in 2024 try to do something about the weather in the next ten to thirty years rather than waiting for Mother Nature to correct herself in ten thousand years?

What do you suggest??? Offer an opinion.

[LeRoySmith]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

Who was it that coined the term "useful idiots"????

The owner of TOTV.