We should be much hotter We should be much hotter - Page 4 - Talk of The Villages Florida

We should be much hotter

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #46  
Old 04-16-2023, 12:46 PM
sounding sounding is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 1,290
Thanks: 734
Thanked 1,015 Times in 635 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 View Post
You mean the fake data.
The government data is indeed real, even the altered temperature data.
  #47  
Old 04-16-2023, 12:53 PM
Keefelane66 Keefelane66 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 1,855
Thanks: 930
Thanked 2,101 Times in 808 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johncolson View Post
Huh! 7 inches of snow in Ft. Lauderdale. Never happened. Some very quick and easy research shows the last time it snowed in Ft. Lauderdale was January of 1977. This was the first report of snow flurries in over 200 years and no reports of snow flurries have been not seen since.
Your mistaken it wasn't 7 inches of snow. According to news reports it was flurries Jan 1977 one day does not a cooling trend make unless you fudge the numbers.
  #48  
Old 04-16-2023, 01:06 PM
sounding sounding is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 1,290
Thanks: 734
Thanked 1,015 Times in 635 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keefelane66 View Post
Your mistaken it wasn't 7 inches of snow. According to news reports it was flurries Jan 1977 one day does not a cooling trend make unless you fudge the numbers.
Not 7 inches, and not flurries -- but it was during the Little Ice Age scare of the 60s and 70s -- which is frequently covered in the Weather Club ... Rare snow in Miami 45 years ago today | WHAM
  #49  
Old 04-16-2023, 01:28 PM
ithos ithos is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,124
Thanks: 2,707
Thanked 851 Times in 412 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=jimjamuser;2208054]
Quote:
Originally Posted by sounding View Post
Excess CO2 from infernal combustion engines IS definitely a pollutant. We have had 8 years of record HEAT worldwide. And ONLY E-vehicles, which are expensive right now can help us out of this serious dilemma.
And how is electricity for those E-Vehicles generated? Vast majority is from carbon fuels. Add to the massive amount of fuel consumed to mine all those rare earth materials and you probably end up creating more CO2 "pollution."

If the overlords were truly concerned about CO2 in the atmosphere, they would promote natural gas and nuclear as well as mandate every engine be a hybrid.

But of course we all know that CO2 reduction is not the objective.
  #50  
Old 04-16-2023, 02:02 PM
nick demis nick demis is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 405
Thanks: 144
Thanked 592 Times in 211 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastskiguy View Post
37 billion metric tons of Co2 dumped into the atmosphere every year just can't be a good thing over time. I'm sure we can all agree on that. Give a hoot, don't pollute!

Joe

Annual CO2 emissions worldwide 1940-2021 | Statista
CO2 and pollution are 2 very different things. The stats you show have been disproven by most climatologist.
  #51  
Old 04-16-2023, 02:05 PM
nick demis nick demis is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 405
Thanks: 144
Thanked 592 Times in 211 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sounding View Post
Not 7 inches, and not flurries -- but it was during the Little Ice Age scare of the 60s and 70s -- which is frequently covered in the Weather Club ... Rare snow in Miami 45 years ago today | WHAM
More people need to go to one of John Shewchuk's talks at the Weather Club meetings.
  #52  
Old 04-16-2023, 02:35 PM
sounding sounding is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 1,290
Thanks: 734
Thanked 1,015 Times in 635 Posts
Default

Overlord dittos.
  #53  
Old 04-16-2023, 02:36 PM
Fastskiguy Fastskiguy is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Linden
Posts: 587
Thanks: 633
Thanked 285 Times in 179 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nick demis View Post
CO2 and pollution are 2 very different things. The stats you show have been disproven by most climatologist.
If you have a source that CO2 emissions are decreasing I would be genuinely interested in seeing it.

Joe
  #54  
Old 04-16-2023, 03:42 PM
Hoosierb4 Hoosierb4 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 102
Thanks: 0
Thanked 48 Times in 18 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=ithos;2208104]
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimjamuser View Post

And how is electricity for those E-Vehicles generated? Vast majority is from carbon fuels. Add to the massive amount of fuel consumed to mine all those rare earth materials and you probably end up creating more CO2 "pollution."

If the overlords were truly concerned about CO2 in the atmosphere, they would promote natural gas and nuclear as well as mandate every engine be a hybrid.

But of course we all know that CO2 reduction is not the objective.
It's not quite so simple. Considering that typical gas powered vehicles are only about 20% efficient in powering cars and that electric vehicles are near 80% efficient, the numbers favor the electric vehicles, even with today's electric generation system....and that system is getting more efficient all the time.
  #55  
Old 04-16-2023, 03:55 PM
Two Bills Two Bills is offline
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,342
Thanks: 1,811
Thanked 8,105 Times in 2,842 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YeOldeCurmudgeon View Post
If the Greenhouse Gas theory is correct, then we are not getting screwed by zealots.
"If" is not a very positive word.
Sort of a maybe, possibly, or could be, not an "It is," is it?
  #56  
Old 04-16-2023, 06:17 PM
Fastskiguy Fastskiguy is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Linden
Posts: 587
Thanks: 633
Thanked 285 Times in 179 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Hoosierb4;2208148]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ithos View Post

It's not quite so simple. Considering that typical gas powered vehicles are only about 20% efficient in powering cars and that electric vehicles are near 80% efficient, the numbers favor the electric vehicles, even with today's electric generation system....and that system is getting more efficient all the time.
Going to need some sources before believing this. Can you cite them please?

Joe
  #57  
Old 04-16-2023, 06:42 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,237
Thanks: 2,245
Thanked 7,647 Times in 2,982 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fastskiguy View Post
Going to need some sources before believing this. Can you cite them please?

Joe
Here's one
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
  #58  
Old 04-16-2023, 06:55 PM
Hoosierb4 Hoosierb4 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 102
Thanks: 0
Thanked 48 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Just google gas powered vehicle efficiency vs electric vehicle efficiency and you should get plenty of sources. Another way of comparing efficiencies is to look at the cost. According to energysage.com, the cost per mile for gas is about 3 times as much as for electricity to charge yur batteries. That reflects the difference in efficiency. Again, it's not even that simple. What you correctly imply is that you need to do a "total environmental warming impact" study (TEWI). I've done a few. But, they take a lot of work and I'm retired now, so won't be doing one here.
  #59  
Old 04-16-2023, 07:12 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 7,237
Thanks: 2,245
Thanked 7,647 Times in 2,982 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosierb4 View Post
Just google gas powered vehicle efficiency vs electric vehicle efficiency and you should get plenty of sources. Another way of comparing efficiencies is to look at the cost. According to energysage.com, the cost per mile for gas is about 3 times as much as for electricity to charge yur batteries. That reflects the difference in efficiency. Again, it's not even that simple. What you correctly imply is that you need to do a "total environmental warming impact" study (TEWI). I've done a few. But, they take a lot of work and I'm retired now, so won't be doing one here.
With $3.00/gal gas and $0.11/Kwh electricity:

Electric cart: $0.01/mile
Gas cart: $0.06/mile
Car: $0.15/mile
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
  #60  
Old 04-17-2023, 06:49 AM
jimjamuser jimjamuser is offline
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 9,863
Thanks: 6,858
Thanked 2,238 Times in 1,806 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Two Bills View Post
All these charts and graphs only prove whatever agenda the posters are supporting.
I do not need any chart or graph to tell me the UK weather/climate is warmer now than 80+ years ago when I was born.
Winters were bitter cold, with plenty of snow and ice.
Soft plants never stood a chance of surviving a winter.
I bring very few in now, and they get through winter mostly unscathed.
Rot due to wet is the main enemy of the gardener now.
Nature does not lie.
The only question that needs answering?
"Is the change in the Climate/Weather man made?"
Because if it isn't, we are being royally screwed by the zealots!
Of course, it is man-made. It happens every time the ignition key is turned on an infernal combustion engine in a car, truck, or golf cart.
Closed Thread

Tags
find, april, 10am, colony, cottage

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 PM.