[Taltarzac725]

Originally Posted by Topspinmo

So you’re saying they’re not getting paid either?

What does that have to do with anything?

Global Warming 101 - Definition, Facts, Causes and Effects of Global Warming

Oppenheimer was paid because he knew the science involved with the physics of nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion - Wikipedia

Scientists working around the world to solve the problem of global warming are paid because they have the credentials.

[mickey100]

You people can can waste your breath "debating" global warming, but the people in the know, ie. scientists (not retired Villagers) have agreed there is no more debate - the consensus of the scientific community is near-unanimous acceptance of the evidence of an artificial greenhouse effect.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by mickey100

You people can can waste your breath "debating" global warming, but the people in the know, ie. scientists (not retired Villagers) have agreed there is no more debate - the consensus of the scientific community is near-unanimous acceptance of the evidence of an artificial greenhouse effect.

Bull. The consensus is among those that are reliant on government and universities for their living

[Topspinmo]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

What does that have to do with anything?

Global Warming 101 - Definition, Facts, Causes and Effects of Global Warming

Oppenheimer was paid because he knew the science involved with the physics of nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion - Wikipedia

Scientists working around the world to solve the problem of global warming are paid because they have the credentials.

As educated man you should know how system works. Oppenheimer was paid so the enemy wouldn’t get the information.

[Topspinmo]

Originally Posted by mickey100

You people can can waste your breath "debating" global warming, but the people in the know, ie. scientists (not retired Villagers) have agreed there is no more debate - the consensus of the scientific community is near-unanimous acceptance of the evidence of an artificial greenhouse effect.

I have to breath anyway so breath not wasted.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by Topspinmo

But, I drive electric car I don’t pay I just get tax breaks..

Excellent.

[Topspinmo]

Originally Posted by blueash

It gets old. You post something but offer absolutely nothing in explanation of how it relates to global warming. Here you posted a chart showing maximum temperature for one moment in a given year. That is weather not climate and you know it. The question is not did Tulsa have the single hottest minute compared to other years. It is did Tulsa have a higher average temperature looking at every minute of the year. Or you could post Did Tulsa have more days over 90 than usual or did it have fewer days below 20. Instead you posted information that is disinformation.

Your attempt to confuse the issue is the best proof that you've got no evidence, just a pseudo scientific belief that you must continue to feed.

Didn’t your chart show maximum temperature in milliseconds second of time? I lived in Oklahoma for 20 years every summer was record temperature and some winters also.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by Byte1

Humans will kill each other off way before global warming or climate change will become lethal.

The power of positive thinking.

[Topspinmo]

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580

The power of positive thinking.

No just history, Rome fell and history repeating itself.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by sounding

Now you know why Al Gore said the debate is over, because he too is afraid to answer that question in public -- because to do so exposes the climate fraud.

You can't answer it either. Like how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood before it runs out of wood. It's the old "baffle with BS", misdirection, deflection. Nonsense.

[sounding]

Originally Posted by Topspinmo

Didn’t your chart show maximum temperature in milliseconds second of time? I lived in Oklahoma for 20 years every summer was record temperature and some winters also.

I just plotted all "maximum" temperatures for Oklahoma from 1900 to 2023. What years did you observe records?

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by sounding

I just plotted all "maximum" temperatures for Oklahoma from 1900 to 2023. What years did you observe records?

Oklahoma? Where the wind comes sweepin' down the plain? And how does this relate to the growing average annual temperature of the entire planet? Or did you just like the look of the graph that shows local weather? Like a piece of art.

[sounding]

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580

You can't answer it either. Like how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood before it runs out of wood. It's the old "baffle with BS", misdirection, deflection. Nonsense.

I don't have to answer it. I did not claim "man-made" CO2 is evil. In a civil society, the accuser has the burden of proof. The jury awaits your proof of CO2 guilt. Otherwise, CO2 is innocent. Cheers.

[jaj523]

For what it's worth, just found the following article. Here is an excerpt:

"It’s official: 2023 was the planet’s warmest year on record, according to an analysis by scientists from NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI).

Along with the historic heat, Antarctic sea ice coverage dropped to a record low in 2023.

“After seeing the 2023 climate analysis, I have to pause and say that the findings are astounding,” said NOAA Chief Scientist Dr. Sarah Kapnick. “Not only was 2023 the warmest year in NOAA’s 174-year climate record — it was the warmest by far. A warming planet means we need to be prepared for the impacts of climate change that are happening here and now, like extreme weather events that become both more frequent and severe."

The entire article can be found online.

[Two Bills]

Ice Age Kansas beat Global Warming Miami.

Proves Global Warming is a myth!