Question for Trump supporters:

Is there anything Trump could do or say that would force you to change your mind and switch your support to Cruz? Proof he was a child molester? Proof he had no knowledge of geography, you know, like George Bush or Sarah Palin?

That's a great question. Trump says he could shoot somebody and not lose support.

Here's my question to Trum supporters:
Instead of a debate I would like to see the candidates sequestered. I would a group of professors from leading institutions to ask pointed questions about to discover the background knowledge on geography, economics, world events, history and opinions on court cases.
Next the candidates would read their essays out loud and everyone could download their answers.
We know how they think on their feet and see their oration skills. We need to know how smart they actually are.
Do you think Trump supporters would help support this new type of vetting?

Originally Posted by Guest

Question for Trump supporters:

Is there anything Trump could do or say that would force you to change your mind and switch your support to Cruz? Proof he was a child molester? Proof he had no knowledge of geography, you know, like George Bush or Sarah Palin?

The primary for Florida is already over. How can someone change now? Hint, I did not vote for Trump, Hillary or Sanders. But, when the general comes around in Nov, I'll be voting for whichever Republican candidate wins the nomination, or gets the nomination if the delegates make the decision. There is no way in bloody h3ll that I would vote for Hillary or Sanders. I would consider that to be treason.

Originally Posted by Guest

That's a great question. Trump says he could shoot somebody and not lose support.

Here's my question to Trump supporters:
Instead of a debate I would like to see the candidates sequestered. I would put together a group of professors from leading institutions to ask pointed questions about background knowledge on geography, economics, world events, history including opinions on court cases.
Next the candidates would read their essays out loud and everyone could download their answers and read along.
We know how they think on their feet and see their oration skills. We need to know how smart they actually are.
Do you think Trump supporters would help support this new type of vetting?

I pushed enter too soon. I didn't proof read it very well. thanks for understanding
It would be interesting to see how the current and past presidents would do on these questions too.

Originally Posted by Guest

That's a great question. Trump says he could shoot somebody and not lose support.

Here's my question to Trum supporters:
Instead of a debate I would like to see the candidates sequestered. I would a group of professors from leading institutions to ask pointed questions about to discover the background knowledge on geography, economics, world events, history and opinions on court cases.
Next the candidates would read their essays out loud and everyone could download their answers.
We know how they think on their feet and see their oration skills. We need to know how smart they actually are.
Do you think Trump supporters would help support this new type of vetting?

So, what you want is to elect a professor as president. We already have a wannabe professor in there. A professor in claim only. And you don't have any problem with his geography knowledge. 57 States doesn't say much for his knowledge of our country. Of course, he seems to have a good grasp of the Muslim countries. That should tell you something.

Perhaps you would wish that a candidate first graduate from a presidential career course? The problem with that is that there is no such prerequisite in the Constitution stipulating these type of requirements. All you need to worry about is whether or not he gets enough electoral votes. It doesn't even have to be a popular vote majority.

Here's a question for you. What would it take for you to switch your support from Hillary? Would an indictment be enough? Would she have to be incarcerated? If she was found guilty of tax fraud, would that convince you?

Originally Posted by Guest

The primary for Florida is already over. How can someone change now? Hint, I did not vote for Trump, Hillary or Sanders. But, when the general comes around in Nov, I'll be voting for whichever Republican candidate wins the nomination, or gets the nomination if the delegates make the decision. There is no way in bloody h3ll that I would vote for Hillary or Sanders. I would consider that to be treason.

Is there anything Trump could do or say that would force you to change your mind

the answer is no?

Originally Posted by Guest

Here's a question for you. What would it take for you to switch your support from Hillary? Would an indictment be enough? Would she have to be incarcerated? If she was found guilty of tax fraud, would that convince you?

Is there anything Trump could do or say that would force you to change your mind

the answer is no?

Originally Posted by Guest

Is there anything Trump could do or say that would force you to change your mind

the answer is no?

Kind of hard to change your vote after already casting it. Of course, I am not a liberal so I am not allowed to vote twice.

Originally Posted by Guest

That's a great question. Trump says he could shoot somebody and not lose support.

Here's my question to Trum supporters:
Instead of a debate I would like to see the candidates sequestered. I would a group of professors from leading institutions to ask pointed questions about to discover the background knowledge on geography, economics, world events, history and opinions on court cases.
Next the candidates would read their essays out loud and everyone could download their answers.
We know how they think on their feet and see their oration skills. We need to know how smart they actually are.
Do you think Trump supporters would help support this new type of vetting?

Now you know that is not fair....and you are just poking a stick at the badger....right?
We all know that Sanders and for sure Clinton would fail.
We also know that Obama would not have made it to the nomination.

The choices these days are very simple.
If any voter wants the establishment, the beurocracy, the cronyism ejected from Washington it must start with electing a non political, non insider, anti establishment, non beholding person to be president.

All others are nothing more than a continuation of the cronyism and political beurocracy and bloat that is the establishment of today....that being both R & D.

So the choices shake out pretty simply given the above.

Tell you what, if you can find a liberal that does NOT believe in genderless bathrooms, then I will vote for them. If you can find me a liberal candidate that believes in balancing the budget, I will consider voting for them. If you can find me a liberal that believes that it is a good thing, not evil to be wealthy, then I will consider voting for them. And if you can find me a liberal that does not believe in man being the culprit in global warming, I will consider voting for them. Put all those traits together and you will have the perfect Democrat candidate.
Otherwise, I will continue to vote for the Republican and hope for the best.

Originally Posted by Guest

Here's a question for you. What would it take for you to switch your support from Hillary? Would an indictment be enough? Would she have to be incarcerated? If she was found guilty of tax fraud, would that convince you?

Start a new thread and I'll answer your question.

Just yesterday Trump said he would consider using nuclear weapons against European countries and any woman who had an abortion should be charged with a crime. Is there any group of people he has not offended?

Originally Posted by Guest

Tell you what, if you can find a liberal that does NOT believe in genderless bathrooms, then I will vote for them. If you can find me a liberal candidate that believes in balancing the budget, I will consider voting for them. If you can find me a liberal that believes that it is a good thing, not evil to be wealthy, then I will consider voting for them. And if you can find me a liberal that does not believe in man being the culprit in global warming, I will consider voting for them. Put all those traits together and you will have the perfect Democrat candidate.
Otherwise, I will continue to vote for the Republican and hope for the best.

Does that mean you are open minded?

Originally Posted by Guest

Just yesterday Trump said he would consider using nuclear weapons against European countries and any woman who had an abortion should be charged with a crime. Is there any group of people he has not offended?

As far as the nuclear option he said that you should take nothing off the table, because circumstances can change drastically. OK I'll give him that. Concerning the abortion crime charge it was a huge blunder, and all the walking back can't undo the damage.