[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by tvbound

No source (or person) gets things correct, 100% of the time. Those with integrity and ethics will usually publicly admit when they're wrong, whereas the wacko & conspiracy starting sources (and people) refuse to ever do so - unless forced to by the legal system. Sandy Hook being the perfect example. Shall I continue?

Yeah, CNN and MSNBC has yet to do that...

The WaPo FINALLY admitted they were wrong about the Russia Hoax and printed a retraction, well over a year after the truth was known...

Sandy Hook? What about it? (other than being a red herring?)

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by tvbound

As I was saying.

"Nicholas Sandmann agreed to settle with the Post because the Post was quick to publish the whole truth—through its follow-up coverage and editor's notes," Sandmann's attorney, Todd McMurtry, said in an email.

The Washington Post settles lawsuit with Nick Sandmann after viral March for Life controversy - CNN


Whereas Jones apologized and quit his lying that the heinous murder of innocent children was faked, only AFTER he lost in court.

Hysterical that you're citing CNN, the OTHER "news" source who had to settle a lawsuit with Sandman... They continued with their lies for months, after the truth was known...

And they're still doing it today, by "reporting" incorrect facts about the Rittenhouse case...

Who the hell is "Jones"?

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by JSR22

He murdered 2 people I do not consider that a mistake. He is now a thug. Hire him? So he can make terrible decisions.
He needs to go to jail.

Murdered? LOL! You spelled "self defense" wrong...

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Eg_cruz

Why do people (like you) who CLEARLY did not watch the 8 days of trail KEEP making comments that are clearly misleading and clearly misinformed

It's what they do... Learned behavior from watching certain news sources that do the same thing (and get sued for $millions and lose)...

[Packer Fan]

Originally Posted by JSR22

He murdered 2 people I do not consider that a mistake. He is now a thug. Hire him? So he can make terrible decisions.
He needs to go to jail.

There is this thing in our country called "Innocent until proven guilty". I guess you don't believe in that. It is fine for a bunch of people to loot and burn a city, but not for anyone to defend it? The kid is a hero.

[JSR22]

Originally Posted by Packer Fan

There is this thing in our country called "Innocent until proven guilty". I guess you don't believe in that. It is fine for a bunch of people to loot and burn a city, but not for anyone to defend it? The kid is a hero.

Hero? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[manaboutown]

Originally Posted by Packer Fan

There is this thing in our country called "Innocent until proven guilty". I guess you don't believe in that. It is fine for a bunch of people to loot and burn a city, but not for anyone to defend it? The kid is a hero.

[Caymus]

Originally Posted by manaboutown

Apparently The Villages contains a pro looting contingent.

[Dr Winston O Boogie jr]

My guess is that he'll be found not guilty on all counts.

[santiagobob]

[QUOTE=Rainger99;2028505]Let's get people on the record before the verdict comes in.
This is your prediction of what the jury will do - not what you want the jury to do.

The choices are

]Guilty on all counts
If a person is carrying a set of golf clubs ,he intends to play golf.
If a person is carrying a fishing pole and a tackle box, he intends to go fishing.
If a person is carrying a loaded automatic weapon, he intends to shoot someone.

[santiagobob]

Originally Posted by manaboutown

So anyone can kill one or two people in a Walmart parking lot and claim that he was protecting property, What is this country coming too???

[Kenswing]

Originally Posted by santiagobob

If a person is carrying a set of golf clubs ,he intends to play golf.
If a person is carrying a fishing pole and a tackle box, he intends to go fishing.
If a person is carrying a loaded automatic weapon, he intends to shoot someone.

If a person carries car insurance does that mean he intends on crashing?

If someone carries a pocket knife does that mean he intends to stab someone?

And just so you know he wasn't carry an automatic weapon. You might want to educate yourself a little about firearms before you comment about them.

[MDLNB]

[QUOTE=santiagobob;2029606]

Originally Posted by Rainger99

Let's get people on the record before the verdict comes in.
This is your prediction of what the jury will do - not what you want the jury to do.

The choices are

]Guilty on all counts
If a person is carrying a set of golf clubs ,he intends to play golf.
If a person is carrying a fishing pole and a tackle box, he intends to go fishing.
If a person is carrying a loaded automatic weapon, he intends to shoot someone.

What if a person is carrying a golf club to a riot?
He was not carrying an "automatic weapon." The proper term is Semi-automatic. Anyone that has ever held a firearm in their hands probably knows that.

Some of us have been carrying a concealed weapon for over 40 years and have yet to shoot someone. It's called "Self-Defense" when a person fires upon another to protect himself or another person. However, to give you a break I will concede that when I carry a firearm to the range, I intend on killing the heck out of a paper target.

To be honest with you, if I was intending on being a good Samaritan during a riot, I would not be carrying a fishing pole or a golf club for protection. And if it was me, I would hope to find another person foolish enough to cover my back so I would not get attacked from behind with a weapon; rock or skate board. A skate board can be used as a deadly weapon, as much as a golf club.

The young man had good intentions, but some scumbags decided that they were going to kill him. They said so. He was fleeing for his life when he was attacked and had to defend himself. Thank goodness for him that his aim was true.

[Bogie Shooter]

[QUOTE=santiagobob;2029606]

Originally Posted by Rainger99

Let's get people on the record before the verdict comes in.
This is your prediction of what the jury will do - not what you want the jury to do.

The choices are

]Guilty on all counts
If a person is carrying a set of golf clubs ,he intends to play golf.
If a person is carrying a fishing pole and a tackle box, he intends to go fishing.
If a person is carrying a loaded automatic weapon, he intends to shoot someone.

Originally Posted by Kenswing

If a person carries car insurance does that mean he intends on crashing?

If someone carries a pocket knife does that mean he intends to stab someone?

And just so you know he wasn't carry an automatic weapon. You might want to educate yourself a little about firearms before you comment about them.

Shame, shame.....


Bob don't go against the party line on this issue.

[Kenswing]

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter

Shame, shame.....


Bob don't go against the party line on this issue.

What party is that? This topic seems to be pretty equally represented from several different points of view. And if you clean up the quotes people will have an easier time knowing what you're talking about.