[DaleDivine]

Originally Posted by Love2Swim

Whether or not the victims were honorable or not is irrelevant. That would be like saying its okay to murder a prostitute because she is not honorable.

Murder is against the law, period. And if he is chasing someone down the street and guns them down, pretty hard to define that as "self defense".

Did he shoot Rosenbaum in the back as he was running away?
NO, your FACTS are misconstrued.

[agjaret@aol.com]

All were there with bad intentions. He was violently attacked and defended himself.

[Love2Swim]

Originally Posted by DaleDivine

Did he shoot Rosenbaum in the back as he was running away?
NO, your FACTS are misconstrued.

Because he chased Rosenbaum down the street, and Rosenbaum turned around and faced him, that makes it okay for rittenhouse to gun him down? Not very good logic.

[Love2Swim]

Originally Posted by MDLNB

You are absolutely correct, IF/IF he was "chasing someone down the street and guns them down." BUT, that is NOT what happened, and anyone that has watched the video and/or observed the trial would know that. He/HE was being chased down the street and assaulted upon several times, even knocking him to the ground. He was justified in ridding society of a couple of vermin. The third guy that survived, may have mistaken him for a criminal shooter, and was still shot in self-defense. But, the third guy to be shot, was carrying a pistol illegally and should not have been chasing the young man down the street.

NOT GUILTY
CASE CLOSED

There is video of him chasing Rosenbaum down the street. No one has the right to "rid society of vermin". Your prejudices are showing.

[Bandb875]

Not Guilty. Clearly self defense.

[MDLNB]

Originally Posted by Love2Swim

There is video of him chasing Rosenbaum down the street. No one has the right to "rid society of vermin". Your prejudices are showing.

Ok, then give us a link to this supposed "chasing Rosenbaum down the street." Was it before or after he was being barraged with stuff being thrown at him or being hit repeatedly in the head with a skateboard?

[mydavid]

I hope the jury takes into account that two people died because of his actions.

[Pamelah]

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby

He should've thought about that the moment before he brought his rifle into the car and made the trip to the riot.

And being only 17 and a typical stupid punk-arse kid, he woopsied on that decision. So having gotten to the riot and realized what a sh.*show it was, he should've hauled butt right back into the car. Another stupid decision on his part.

So - he'll have to live with knowing that he is "THAT GUY" for the rest of his life. If he doesn't like it, he could just plead guilty on all counts, GO to jail, where he can live the rest of his life in relative anonymity.

Wow you hit so many nails on the head with this post you could have shingled. a whole house. Again I’ll say it’s a damn sad commentary anyone 17, 45, or 93 should be allowed to strut their stuff carrying that weapon.

[Pamelah]

Originally Posted by JMintzer

What did she do wrong?

Didn’t she drive him to the event?
Didn’t she know and allow him to walk around toting such a weapon. She is guilty of a lot buddy.

[DeanFL]

.
.
To all those on the side stating that he is GUILTY!!!... you're right.
.
.

[Pamelah]

Originally Posted by JSR22

I hope Rittenhouse is convicted and spends many years in jail.

Alongside his clueless mother.

[ithos]

Just a reminder of the true outrageous crimes being committed during that time when thugs ran wild with virtually no condemnation by the corporate media.

Officials responded to 37 fires in Kenosha on 2nd night of protests, 1 '''nearly leveled several city blocks'''

[Susan1717]

What about the felons that lived that assaulted him? One had a pistol. There should also be charges against them! Abd to see the videos of all the thugs rioting, looting, destroying property and hurting others…. Awful that the police had to stand down. Awful that cities are allowing this to happen. They all should be in jail. The boy shouldn’t have had a gun but if he hadn’t, he’d probably be dead. Possession was wrong but was self defense

[donfey]

Originally Posted by tophcfa

I predict that no matter which way things come out, half the population will be pi$$ed off.

At this point, the trial has very little to do with justice.,

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Lindsyburnsy

Two victims were unarmed and the one who survived always carried a pistol when he went to work as an actual paramedic. What mother drives her under age kid across state lines carrying an AR15 which he was too young to own, to a violent protest? This kid beat up a girl not long ago but the judge wouldn’t let the jury hear it. This won’t be the end of Rittenhouse’s criminal problems.

Incorrect.

1: His mother did not drive him there. He drove himself.

2: He did NOT transport an AR-15 across state lines. Oh, and the "State Lines" argument is BS anyway. Kenosha is right on the border between Wisconsin and Ohio. Many people live in one and work in the other. Rittenhouse was a lifeguard who worked in Kenosha. His father lived there. It was 15 minutes from his home.

Here in the DC area, millions of people "cross state lines" to work every single day. I live in MD, but work in DC...

3: Grosskreutz, (the parmedic) was carrying his pistol with an expired license, and actually traveled farther to get to Kenosha than did Rittenhouse...

4: There is no proof the Rittenhouse "beat up a girl"...

Did Kyle Rittenhouse Punch a Woman in This Video? | Snopes.com


But sure, let's start up with the arguments that got the other thread locked down...