[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by JSR22

I hope Rittenhouse is convicted and spends many years in jail.

Prepare to be disappointed...

[dewilson58]

Originally Posted by donfey

I hope you're never on a jury!

If honest during questioning, he never will.

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Love2Swim

One of the victims viewed Rittenhouse as a danger with the rifle, and one was told Rittenhouse was an active shooter. One tried forcibly to wrestle the assault rifle from Rittenhouse, and it cost him his life.The other, Gaige, pointed his gun at Rittenhouse, trying to get him to put the rifle down after being told Rittenhouse was an active shooter, and he too was shot by Rittenhouse. The lesson here: never ever mess with a stupid teenager who thinks he's a vigilante, and carries an assault rifle he isn't even legally entitled to have in his possession.

Fact - Rittenhouse was seen at a bar with members of a white nationalist group in January, and traveled to Miami days later to meet the group's national president.

Fact - Rittenhouse is heard in a video watching some men exit a CVS pharmacy and commenting that he wished he had his rifle so he could shoot them because he thought they were shoplifters.

Fact - the FBI has infrared video footage of Rittenhouse chasing Rosenbaum, the first person Rittenhouse gunned down.

Put it all together - its not hard to connect the dots.

Fact: All of that is BS... It means nothing and most of it is false...

But sure, change this thread into the last one that was shut down...

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Love2Swim

Whether or not the victims were honorable or not is irrelevant. That would be like saying its okay to murder a prostitute because she is not honorable.

Murder is against the law, period. And if he is chasing someone down the street and guns them down, pretty hard to define that as "self defense".

Except he was running away, so there's that...

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Love2Swim

The judge said on Friday he would instruct the jury they can consider the prosecution's argument that the teenager provoked an encounter with one of two men he fatally shot during protests in Wisconsin last year. This again shows Rittenhouse being an aggressor, not the poor innocent bystander image he is trying to project, with his big crocodile tears. Puh-leeze. No one bought that corny routine.

No, it means they can consider the BS argument the DA TRIED to make...

[louie34]

Not guilty

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by crash

Yes after he killed someone they tried to stop him. You live in a world where a girl can get raped on the subway and people see it happening and do nothing. I prefer to live in a world where they see it happen and do something to stop it.

Sure, they were trying to make a "citizen's arrest"!

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Love2Swim

Because he chased Rosenbaum down the street, and Rosenbaum turned around and faced him, that makes it okay for rittenhouse to gun him down? Not very good logic.

Did you even watch the trial?

He ran away from Rosenbaum. Rosenbaum was the aggressor, chasing Rittenhouse.

Anyone with two working synapses could see that! Oh, wait...

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Love2Swim

There is video of him chasing Rosenbaum down the street. No one has the right to "rid society of vermin". Your prejudices are showing.

Please cite a source to this "magic video" that the prosecution somehow forgot to enter into evidence...

[bruce213]

Guilty on some accounts.

Even if he's found not guilty, his future is bleak. He has cut his opertunities by half. Limiting his job options, girlfriends his name will always be a Trivia question.

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by MDLNB

Ok, then give us a link to this supposed "chasing Rosenbaum down the street." Was it before or after he was being barraged with stuff being thrown at him or being hit repeatedly in the head with a skateboard?

It must have been before (sarcasm). The skateboard idiot attacked Rittenhouse alter Rosenbaum had been shot...

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by mydavid

I hope the jury takes into account that two people died because of his actions.

You spelled "because of THEIR OWN actions" wrong...

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Pamelah

Didn’t she drive him to the event?
Didn’t she know and allow him to walk around toting such a weapon. She is guilty of a lot buddy.

No and no... He drove himself and the rifle was at his friend's house in Kenosha...

But you would have known that if you had actually watched the trial...

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Pamelah

Alongside his clueless mother.

What did she do wrong? (this should be interesting...)

[waterflower]

That is so important to understand...The trial of understanding the constitution....which most Americans don't even care about.