[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Steve

But keep in mind, according to NASA's own study which was completed in 2000 but just recently released, human activity is NOT the cause of "Global Warming". According to NASA, the Earth's axis is shifting slightly AND the Earth's path around the sun is getting closer to the sun. Carbon emissions, according to NASA, are not the cause of "Global Warming" or "Climate Change".

Once again, please don't confuse anyone with the FACTS.

[Taltarzac725]

Fact Check-NASA did not announce that climate change is only driven by variations to Earth’s orbital position relative to the sun | Reuters

That NASA report looks like a myth.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

Fact Check-NASA did not announce that climate change is only driven by variations to Earth’s orbital position relative to the sun | Reuters

That NASA report looks like a myth.

Perhaps. Or perhaps their current back peddling is a myth.

Let's see-----why would an agency pretty much totally funded by the US government now want to express a position that mimics the current agenda??? Think hard, just why might they do that?????

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by Steve

But keep in mind, according to NASA's own study which was completed in 2000 but just recently released, human activity is NOT the cause of "Global Warming". According to NASA, the Earth's axis is shifting slightly AND the Earth's path around the sun is getting closer to the sun. Carbon emissions, according to NASA, are not the cause of "Global Warming" or "Climate Change".

Does anyone have a link to this study and not a NASA climate page with a lot of information? I'm interested in a link to a study completed in 2000 but just recently released.

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by chet2020

We have reasonably good data going back to 1950. Of course data can be interpreted differently, but the link below is NASA's interpretation. Summary statement from paper:

In Brief:
Due to global warming, global climate models predict hurricanes will likely cause more intense rainfall and have an increased coastal flood risk due to higher storm surge caused by rising seas. Additionally, the global frequency of storms may decrease or remain unchanged, but hurricanes that form are more likely to become intense.

A Force of Nature: Hurricanes in a Changing Climate – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet

"Likely"...

[tvbound]

Originally Posted by Steve

But keep in mind, according to NASA's own study which was completed in 2000 but just recently released, human activity is NOT the cause of "Global Warming". According to NASA, the Earth's axis is shifting slightly AND the Earth's path around the sun is getting closer to the sun. Carbon emissions, according to NASA, are not the cause of "Global Warming" or "Climate Change".

You might want to actually fact check that (with legitimate sources), as NASA said/inferred/alluded to - absolutely no such thing.

[tvbound]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

Does anyone have a link to this study and not a NASA climate page with a lot of information? I'm interested in a link to a study completed in 2000 but just recently released.

No, NASA did not admit that changes in Earth’s solar orbit, not human activity, is causing climate change | Fact Check


"The false article includes graphs from a NASA publication from the year 2000 as purported proof that variations in shape and angles of the Earth’s orbit over thousands of years, as explained by the Milankovitch theory, alone explain the warming trends.

At no point does the NASA publication used by the authors of the viral article deny that humans have an influence over climate change. There is scientific consensus that human activities are causing climate change, including reports from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of 1,300 independent scientific experts."

[B-flat]

The elites don't want to save the climate, they want to save the world for themselves and eventually kill off the common man.

[tvbound]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

Perhaps. Or perhaps their current back peddling is a myth.

Let's see-----why would an agency pretty much totally funded by the US government now want to express a position that mimics the current agenda??? Think hard, just why might they do that?????

Oh the naiveté (purposeful deceit?) it takes, to think those whose wealth is predicated on fossil fuels have less incentive to lie/have an agenda - than those making comparatively low government wages. I mean...really?

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by tvbound

Oh the naiveté (purposeful deceit?) it takes, to think those whose wealth is predicated on fossil fuels have less incentive to lie/have an agenda - than those making comparatively low government wages. I mean...really?

Low government wages? Like Elon Musk? Price out a Tesla lately???😂😂😂

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by tvbound

No, NASA did not admit that changes in Earth’s solar orbit, not human activity, is causing climate change | Fact Check


"The false article includes graphs from a NASA publication from the year 2000 as purported proof that variations in shape and angles of the Earth’s orbit over thousands of years, as explained by the Milankovitch theory, alone explain the warming trends.

At no point does the NASA publication used by the authors of the viral article deny that humans have an influence over climate change. There is scientific consensus that human activities are causing climate change, including reports from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of 1,300 independent scientific experts."

I’d love to see the original article from 20 years ago. Of course, at that time not everything was posted on the internet. So if this paper is such a myth, why is NASA only denying it now? Could the political winds (ie: their funding) have something to do with it???

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

I’d love to see the original article from 20 years ago. Of course, at that time not everything was posted on the internet. So if this paper is such a myth, why is NASA only denying it now? Could the political winds (ie: their funding) have something to do with it???

That particular factcheck is from 2019. The original "article" is linked and doesn't make any claims at all about man's influence on climate.

Seems like a case of confirmation bias that is repeating for at least the second time.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

That particular factcheck is from 2019. The original "article" is linked and doesn't make any claims at all about man's influence on climate.

Seems like a case of confirmation bias that is repeating for at least the second time.

And there's no way that "original" article that was linked could have been "edited"???
Tens of billions in funding---people have killed for less.

And if it didn't "make any claims at all about man's influence on climate", that kind of speaks for itself.

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

And there's no way that "original" article that was linked could have been "edited"???
Tens of billions in funding---people have killed for less.

And if it didn't "make any claims at all about man's influence on climate", that kind of speaks for itself.

Are you being serious? The conspiracies you are implying rival those dreamed up for the pandemic and the vaccinations! What's next, should we all start doing our own research?

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

Are you being serious? The conspiracies you are implying rival those dreamed up for the pandemic and the vaccinations! What's next, should we all start doing our own research?

Yes, I was being intentionally obtuse. Yet consider how many people were convinced that a certain person "colluded" with a certain government to influence a certain election.