Originally Posted by Guest

I must have missed something ... what was it again by way of accomplishment and qualifications that enabled Obama to manage things?

There goes the Saul Alenski tactic of deflecting the question instead of giving an answer. Seems as though Republicans like to use Alenski tactics when they work in their favor, don't you, Comrade?

Originally Posted by Guest

You are a troll. Do us all a favor and don't post again as you have nothing intelligent to add to the discussion.

You and your fellow useful idiots should just accept the fact you are outdated and not part of the current market share.

Originally Posted by Guest

All one has to do is look at the encmbent and that should end what kinds of qualifications it takes to run and be elected! A good (supposedly according to some) talker...PROMISER.

And instead of questioning Fiorina, how about answering the very good request above....how about a Clinton resume' and accomplishments.

I am so sorry. I didn't realize that a thread about Fiorina and her possible aptitude for POTUS was an improper place to review her accomplishments. Instead as I understand your new rule, the proper protocol in all threads is to use whatever topic is presented and twist it into an attack on someone else. Thank you for your guidance in this matter. And just so you don't miss the snide tone to my post, your spelling is as poor as your rhetorical skill.

Originally Posted by Guest

There goes the Saul Alenski tactic of deflecting the question instead of giving an answer. Seems as though Republicans like to use Alenski tactics when they work in their favor, don't you, Comrade?

As least Republicans can spell Saul Alinsky's name correctly.

Originally Posted by Guest

I am so sorry. I didn't realize that a thread about Fiorina and her possible aptitude for POTUS was an improper place to review her accomplishments. Instead as I understand your new rule, the proper protocol in all threads is to use whatever topic is presented and twist it into an attack on someone else. Thank you for your guidance in this matter. And just so you don't miss the snide tone to my post, your spelling is as poor as your rhetorical skill.

Must be problematical for such beings that are all knowing.....you would like others to believe.
The mode of operation is divert, delay, deny, name call, categorize anything not in alignment with what you prefer to support.

Your options are:
>don't bother answering my posts
>if you don't agree just say so instead of being nasty all the time
>if there were an emoticon for flipping the bird I would show it and offer you to sit on it

The BS responses used to be at best entertaining. That has worn off.

If you don't like the rhetoric....don't respond.
I put mis-spelled words in by design to give those who enjoy picking fly specs out of pepper something to do since they cannot communicate with decency.

Oh do I ever miss the ignore button.

You are clearly a bitter and narrow minded fool.

Originally Posted by Guest

You and your fellow useful idiots should just accept the fact you are outdated and not part of the current market share.

Originally Posted by Guest

You are clearly a bitter and narrow minded fool.

No, I am not the Republican.

Originally Posted by Guest

No, I am not the Republican.

No but your a clearly a genuine idiot and, to be blunt, not that bright

Originally Posted by Guest

No but your a clearly a genuine idiot and, to be blunt, not that bright

It's a good thing he's not a republican, can you imagine how dumb he would be then. It could be worse he could be the village idiots, the villages tea party, so far to the right the tricounty tea party wants nothing to do with them! Duuuuummmmmmb

Originally Posted by Guest

No but your a clearly a genuine idiot and, to be blunt, not that bright

Go back to grade school and see the the contraction of "you are" is "you're", so by making a very basic mistake like that in your "official language", you have shown you are a dim bulb.

Personal best regards.

I really do not think we have to even talk about Carly anymore.

In the latest Fox News Poll, she did not get even 1 percent of the respondents saying they would vote for her as President.

She is now as newsworthy as the newspaper on the bottom of a birdcage.

Originally Posted by Guest

I really do not think we have to even talk about Carly anymore.

In the latest Fox News Poll, she did not get even 1 percent of the respondents saying they would vote for her as President.

She is now as newsworthy as the newspaper on the bottom of a birdcage.

Some keep hoping she won't.
Living by the poll numbers is a losing game is it not.

This time of year in the 2008 race Clinton was viewd as the parties choice. She got knocked out of first place by a relatively unknown. I am sure it was not because the party need a black candidate before a female candidate.
And so for 2016 she has even more negative baggage and controversy and you all think she is invulnerable.

Why is that?

I do believe some dems greatest fear is that Fiorina runs. Defeats all the first woman POTUS BS.

Originally Posted by Guest

I really do not think we have to even talk about Carly anymore.

In the latest Fox News Poll, she did not get even 1 percent of the respondents saying they would vote for her as President.

She is now as newsworthy as the newspaper on the bottom of a birdcage.

Since you talk about a woman candidate in such a disrespectful way (ie birdcage comment) I can only assume you are an incorrigible woman-hating sexist pig. I'm offended.

Besides, you don't understand the basic strategy she is employing. She's running for VP not Presidential nod. And, I think she has an excellent chance of getting it for a lot of reasons. She's accomplished, smart and apparently fearless.

Originally Posted by Guest

Since you talk about a woman candidate in such a disrespectful way (ie birdcage comment) I can only assume you are an incorrigible woman-hating sexist pig. I'm offended.

Besides, you don't understand the basic strategy she is employing. She's running for VP not Presidential nod. And, I think she has an excellent chance of getting it for a lot of reasons. She's accomplished, smart and apparently fearless.

Seems like these are attributes of rarity in politics. It is hard to tell as we NEVER get to hear about the good stuff done by the good politicians.

Originally Posted by Guest

Since you talk about a woman candidate in such a disrespectful way (ie birdcage comment) I can only assume you are an incorrigible woman-hating sexist pig. I'm offended.

Besides, you don't understand the basic strategy she is employing. She's running for VP not Presidential nod. And, I think she has an excellent chance of getting it for a lot of reasons. She's accomplished, smart and apparently fearless.

The GOP must have a pretty low bar if they think a woman that lost her senate race by 10% points and got fired from her job at Hewitt-Packard is accomplished, smart and fearless. Sarah Palin at least got elected governor once in her life.

Where does Carly stand on the TPA? Where does Carly stand on the XXE? Where does Carly stand on the IUD? Let's hear her positions before we cast our votes.