Originally Posted by Guest

Obama's and Hilary's so-called female wage disparity is all a sham. Experts have proven, on both the liberal side and conservative side that there is NO disparity other than sports. And the only reason for the disparity in sports is because of sports fan's participation, as to the audience size in female sports versus the male sports. It has been proven that women get paid the same level wage as males in the same profession. The difference is in the past now. Obama and Hillary are attempting to hype the uninformed voters. That's the reason that they get so many low earner votes and ignorant elite votes.

You are wrong, or else delusional from watching too much Faux news. You can never find any statistics to back up what you claim because they don't exist.

Originally Posted by Guest

Without quotas and affirmative action, the minorities would be left out in the cold...literally. What would become of them if we weren't forced to hire them? Would anyone hire ANY of them? THAT shows you how "equal" they are.

If you had a business where real work is done, how many women do you think you'd hire? They like to work inside, filling "make work" jobs for all the paperwork government requires. You hardly ever find women doing "real" work, strenuous work, building, digging, working in the cold and mud. They're hardly "equal". Without men, white men, the world we have now, wouldn't have happened. They are "The West".

What kind of a world do the minorities create? Somalia? Detroit? Chicago slums? Where are the great "maternal" civilizations? They don't exist...for a reason.

Sounds like you are in angry white male who had either a minority or a woman as a boss and it really ****ed you off. You must really hate it that you have a black man As a President.

Originally Posted by Guest

Sounds like you are in angry white male who had either a minority or a woman as a boss and it really ****ed you off. You must really hate it that you have a black man As a President.

Wow, talk about angry! You are a very unhappy person and should seek help. And your credibility is really in jeopardy when you have to resort to the race issue to end a discussion. It's not my comment that you are replying to, but I can see the anger in your comment. I will pray for you.

Originally Posted by Guest

Sounds like you are in angry white male who had either a minority or a woman as a boss and it really ****ed you off. You must really hate it that you have a black man As a President.

And, you sound like an lazy underachiever who blames the Republicans, Wall Street, perceived pay disparity, social injustice, etc. for your lack of success.

Originally Posted by Guest

Sounds like you are in angry white male who had either a minority or a woman as a boss and it really ****ed you off. You must really hate it that you have a black man As a President.

Yup...bosses, co-workers, teachers...ALL must have gotten there via a quota, because they were pretty near worthless.

Yes to that too...I can't believe how stupid the "people" are, to think he'd do anything good. He changed America all right, and handed "us" (not those he helped) the bill. Yup, $10 TRILLION dollars. You're share of the bill for the "change" is $30,000 so far. Every man woman and child in America "owes" an extra $30,000, our share of the federal debt, since O took office. Was it worth it? A years salary for the average worker. They owe a full year of work to .gov.

Keep voting for them Ds and Rs...run the nation into the ground. Hasten the decline into 3rd worldness. We can ONLY be "equal" when the standards have been lowered to THEIR LEVEL. We were number 1, 50 years ago, now we're in the middle, soon, after total "equality", we'll be with the likes of the African nations. Because that's what they do, they turn everything into a slum. Welcome to equality, welcome to diversity.

Originally Posted by Guest

Wow, talk about angry! You are a very unhappy person and should seek help. And your credibility is really in jeopardy when you have to resort to the race issue to end a discussion. It's not my comment that you are replying to, but I can see the anger in your comment. I will pray for you.

Angry? No, just telling you what I believe is the truth. The one's who's credibility is in question is the one who is deceived and can't see the truth. You are being lied to when they talk about the "equality". It's not anger, it's simply telling the truth and not the lies we're subject to every day.

Pray for me? You believe that other great lie? Religion. I'd pray for you, but I know it wouldn't do any good.

You're being led around by your nose, told what to think, what to say, who to vote for. Tear off those chains and be your own person, have your own thoughts, stop being lazy, open your eyes, and think for yourself.

Originally Posted by Guest

You are wrong, or else delusional from watching too much Faux news. You can never find any statistics to back up what you claim because they don't exist.

Ah, but on the other hand you are going to take Hillary and Obama's word for it, when they have no credible evidence to support them, and their comments on the issues have been found to be wrong by almost every reality check website.

There is a gender pay gap, but not due to discrimination. The gap is due mostly to choices men and women make in their careers and not discrimination. Once you account for a number of factors, including taking time off from work and different careers, then there isn't any evidence that it's true discrimination. Men tend to take higher risk careers that pay higher due to the danger/risk than women. Women tend to take jobs requiring less risk and less pay. You are not going to pay a secretary the same as the executive. If you have a woman executive with a male secretary, do you think that the male gets paid more than the executive?

The only disparity is by choice. You can't mandate a population's choice, unless you take into consideration the socialists of communist Russia when it was the USSR.

Wage disparity is ALL HYPE being used against the ignorant, uniformed losers that are disgruntled, by the elite politicians such as Hillary and Obama to get their ignorant votes.

You ask for links? I raise you one better. Give me evidence of a career, other than sports where a woman gets paid less than a man, doing the same job. Good luck.

Originally Posted by Guest

Angry? No, just telling you what I believe is the truth. The one's who's credibility is in question is the one who is deceived and can't see the truth. You are being lied to when they talk about the "equality". It's not anger, it's simply telling the truth and not the lies we're subject to every day.

Pray for me? You believe that other great lie? Religion. I'd pray for you, but I know it wouldn't do any good.

You're being led around by your nose, told what to think, what to say, who to vote for. Tear off those chains and be your own person, have your own thoughts, stop being lazy, open your eyes, and think for yourself.

You are pretty miserable, aren't you? Religion? What religion? You don't need religion to have faith. I can understand how you can be so angry and helpless, when you have no hope or faith. It's OK, you can strike out at those that have what you secretly seek. They can take it, if their faith is strong. Anger is not healthy so seek some help.

Originally Posted by Guest

And, you sound like an lazy underachiever who blames the Republicans, Wall Street, perceived pay disparity, social injustice, etc. for your lack of success.

Originally Posted by Guest

Ah, but on the other hand you are going to take Hillary and Obama's word for it, when they have no credible evidence to support them, and their comments on the issues have been found to be wrong by almost every reality check website.

There is a gender pay gap, but not due to discrimination. The gap is due mostly to choices men and women make in their careers and not discrimination. Once you account for a number of factors, including taking time off from work and different careers, then there isn't any evidence that it's true discrimination. Men tend to take higher risk careers that pay higher due to the danger/risk than women. Women tend to take jobs requiring less risk and less pay. You are not going to pay a secretary the same as the executive. If you have a woman executive with a male secretary, do you think that the male gets paid more than the executive?

The only disparity is by choice. You can't mandate a population's choice, unless you take into consideration the socialists of communist Russia when it was the USSR.

Wage disparity is ALL HYPE being used against the ignorant, uniformed losers that are disgruntled, by the elite politicians such as Hillary and Obama to get their ignorant votes.

You ask for links? I raise you one better. Give me evidence of a career, other than sports where a woman gets paid less than a man, doing the same job. Good luck.

That's easier for you, isn't it.

Worth reading
Obama’s 77-Cent Exaggeration

Originally Posted by Guest

That's easier for you, isn't it.

Don't make comments that you can't back up. If you suggest that women don't make the same as men in the same job, then prove it. Give me some overwhelming evidence of disparity. Not statistics based on total income of women versus men when women take off to take care of family or women that can't or won't do the same dangerous jobs of men. Give me statistics that suggest that women doing the SAME job as men, make less. Other than sports.

I'm sure you can come up with something...right?

Originally Posted by Guest

Don't make comments that you can't back up. If you suggest that women don't make the same as men in the same job, then prove it. Give me some overwhelming evidence of disparity. Not statistics based on total income of women versus men when women take off to take care of family or women that can't or won't do the same dangerous jobs of men. Give me statistics that suggest that women doing the SAME job as men, make less. Other than sports.

I'm sure you can come up with something...right?

I handed to you:
Worth reading
Obama’s 77-Cent Exaggeration
Did you read it?

Originally Posted by Guest

I handed to you:
Worth reading
Obama’s 77-Cent Exaggeration
Did you read it?

I guess not.

Originally Posted by Guest

I handed to you:
Worth reading
Obama’s 77-Cent Exaggeration
Did you read it?

That just reinforces what I said. Women make the same as men IF they are working the same job. You are a typical liberal with diversion tactics of totally misrepresenting the facts. Women make less than men in that article based ONLY on statistics of male versus female total pay, totally disregarding type of work/career. This is typical liberal smoke and mirrors.

I will challenge you once again to come up with one piece of evidence that women are making less than men when they are both doing the same job, not including sports. Sports doesn't count because a lot of pay is for the entertainment value of the sport according to the volume of audience participation.

So, to make it easy for you to prove your liberal point, find me evidence that women are not making as much as men, while doing the same job/career.