Originally Posted by MDLNB

So, you libtards do not believe the same intel agencies when they said there was WMDs in Iraq, but now you believe them when they are reputed to having said that the Russians have hacked our election. And this has less proof than what they gave congress about the WMDs. Liberals are great at this stuff. I think everyone knows who the morons are..............the losers.

You talk about libtards! You reptards beleive anything trumptard says even if a couple of hours later he denies saying it. Now, it sounds like all you reptards know more about what the Russians are doing than our intelligence community. Trumptard could go on stage nude and say don't you just love my knew clothes, and you reptards would say trumptard, they're absolutely stunning. Once again you made yourself wonderful again. You're a bunch of reptards!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

So, you libtards do not believe the same intel agencies when they said there was WMDs in Iraq, but now you believe them when they are reputed to having said that the Russians have hacked our election. And this has less proof than what they gave congress about the WMDs. Liberals are great at this stuff. I think everyone knows who the morons are..............the losers.

sooo, do you discount anything that comes out of the CIA or FBI BUT you believe Julian A. and the Russians????? How do we get back to being Americans first and foremost! The hate that comes out of TOTV is disheartening to say the least. I know there is a light at the end of this tunnel, I just hope it doesn't take 4 years, God help us!

Originally Posted by Guest

sooo, do you discount anything that comes out of the CIA or FBI BUT you believe Julian A. and the Russians????? How do we get back to being Americans first and foremost! The hate that comes out of TOTV is disheartening to say the least. I know there is a light at the end of this tunnel, I just hope it doesn't take 4 years, God help us!

Good post.

Listen, Trump's entire life.....all documented clearly.....showed and shows that a choice between HIM and anybody or anything will be made about HIM.

I think your post is great....it is NOT about the United States...it is about how he perceives this reflects on HIM...all his stements reflect that.

This how he is, and has been his entire life.

I, at one time thought...give him a chance...he will grow and maybe, he gets some jobs back..

But, as you say it is disheartening reading support for a President that disses the country without reason. Most adults would discuss this privately face to face rather than reveal the world how he feels about the USA (BAD) Putin (GOOD) Assange (GOOD).

A President, especially being brand new, normally gets the country excited about his plans, but then again this is a man who has never done anything for his country EXCEPT criticize it.


When asked if he was aware that Putin had people killed...Trump response..so what people die in the his country also.

Have you heard him, while carping publicly ever offer a word of encouragement for intelligence services or even to this country.

Originally Posted by Guest

You talk about libtards! You reptards beleive anything trumptard says even if a couple of hours later he denies saying it. Now, it sounds like all you reptards know more about what the Russians are doing than our intelligence community. Trumptard could go on stage nude and say don't you just love my knew clothes, and you reptards would say trumptard, they're absolutely stunning. Once again you made yourself wonderful again. You're a bunch of reptards!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nice try at turning it around when it was your side on here trying to convince everyone that the Intel agencies are 100% correct. But, like I said before you don't believe the same Intel agencies when they said there were WMDs. Make up your mind. I never said that I believed anyone. You are the ones making all the statements of absolutes. The point is that no one disputes what Wikileaks produced regarding the DNC's emails or anything coming from Hillary. SO, stop blaming Trump. The Russians have been hacking for decades, so get over it. I am not championing Putin or Russia. Neither is Trump. He said Putin is a better leader than Obama. So am I. Obama can't be blamed in that regard. He has never received any training and has never had a job that required leadership. Obama is weak, and everyone knows it. It is admirable that you wish to defend him. He needs it. He is weak.

So, you libtards need to quit crying. It's very unbecoming.

Originally Posted by Guest

Good post.

Listen, Trump's entire life.....all documented clearly.....showed and shows that a choice between HIM and anybody or anything will be made about HIM.

I think your post is great....it is NOT about the United States...it is about how he perceives this reflects on HIM...all his stements reflect that.

This how he is, and has been his entire life.

I, at one time thought...give him a chance...he will grow and maybe, he gets some jobs back..

But, as you say it is disheartening reading support for a President that disses the country without reason. Most adults would discuss this privately face to face rather than reveal the world how he feels about the USA (BAD) Putin (GOOD) Assange (GOOD).

A President, especially being brand new, normally gets the country excited about his plans, but then again this is a man who has never done anything for his country EXCEPT criticize it.


When asked if he was aware that Putin had people killed...Trump response..so what people die in the his country also.

Have you heard him, while carping publicly ever offer a word of encouragement for intelligence services or even to this country.

Is this the best you can do. Trump won, so get over it.

Originally Posted by Guest

Nice try at turning it around when it was your side on here trying to convince everyone that the Intel agencies are 100% correct. But, like I said before you don't believe the same Intel agencies when they said there were WMDs. Make up your mind. I never said that I believed anyone. You are the ones making all the statements of absolutes. The point is that no one disputes what Wikileaks produced regarding the DNC's emails or anything coming from Hillary. SO, stop blaming Trump. The Russians have been hacking for decades, so get over it. I am not championing Putin or Russia. Neither is Trump. He said Putin is a better leader than Obama. So am I. Obama can't be blamed in that regard. He has never received any training and has never had a job that required leadership. Obama is weak, and everyone knows it. It is admirable that you wish to defend him. He needs it. He is weak.

So, you libtards need to quit crying. It's very unbecoming.

I certainly do not recall one single post saying what you are citing....none.

Nobody could know, for gosh sakes and anyone who questions something they are not even aware of is a fool.

Nope...the story is, and has been..one thing...

President Elect of the United States publicly for international coverage, mocking the United States intelligence community, prior to even being briefed. Then following it up by

A. telling the country to "move on" instead of investigating the hacks

B. Suggesting, not only do we move on, but we should discuss prior sanctions placed on Russia for actions and to support our friends.

C. Speaking positively of Putin and Assange in subsequent tweets.


There would be no story had he acted like an adult and after being briefed asked or questioned in person, face to face, man to man instead of he perceiving it as something "mean" about HIM. Country be damned.

Originally Posted by Guest

I certainly do not recall one single post saying what you are citing....none.

Nobody could know, for gosh sakes and anyone who questions something they are not even aware of is a fool.

Nope...the story is, and has been..one thing...

President Elect of the United States publicly for international coverage, mocking the United States intelligence community, prior to even being briefed. Then following it up by

A. telling the country to "move on" instead of investigating the hacks

B. Suggesting, not only do we move on, but we should discuss prior sanctions placed on Russia for actions and to support our friends.

C. Speaking positively of Putin and Assange in subsequent tweets.


There would be no story had he acted like an adult and after being briefed asked or questioned in person, face to face, man to man instead of he perceiving it as something "mean" about HIM. Country be damned.

Wow, I could almost see the tears in that post. If I press you a bit more, might you even modify your comment to reflect that Trump did not say anything positive about Putin or "Assange" but just said what the result was that we had stuff revealed that should have been discovered by the press? Or, instead of saying that Trump was friends with Putin, that he said Putin was a better leader than Obama? Which is true, of course. It won't be long before you finally admit that you are lying about what Trump said. Naw.......you will change the subject, just like liberals always do.

Originally Posted by Guest

YOU don't KNOW for a FACT that ANY of that is true.

The government, through the media...lies...a LOT.

I said the event was written twice . Apparently no one knows for sure that is alive and willing to talk about it.

However we have learned that Assad had hidden his cache of poisons well until he used them on his was able to successfully hide people. We know Saddam was able to successfully hide aircraft in the desert and we know that Saddam openly used chemical weapon against the Kurds We know WMD can fit in a military truck and be transported easily.

All I am suggesting is that Saddam had plenty of time to moved every trace of his WMD given Bush's delay in moving forward with his plan to go into Iraq .

Washington people are forced to say no WMD because it is difficult to disprove a negative

Personal Best Regards

Originally Posted by Guest

I said the event was written twice . Apparently no one knows for sure that is alive and willing to talk about it.

However we have learned that Assad had hidden his cache of poisons well until he used them on his was able to successfully hide people. We know Saddam was able to successfully hide aircraft in the desert and we know that Saddam openly used chemical weapon against the Kurds We know WMD can fit in a military truck and be transported easily.

All I am suggesting is that Saddam had plenty of time to moved every trace of his WMD given Bush's delay in moving forward with his plan to go into Iraq .

Washington people are forced to say no WMD because it is difficult to disprove a negative

Personal Best Regards

Exactly. The one question that no liberal has been able to answer, other than denial is; if there were no WMDs in Iraq, how do they explain away those thousands of bodies in mass graves of people killed by gas?

We can eliminate 90% of the foolishness we call "politics" by following these first principles of Liberty:


"Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights.

Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS:

- those that protect property rights,

- and those that attack property rights.

"Have the government do unto others as you'd have the government do unto you."

We can eliminate 90% of the foolishness we call "politics" by following these first principles of Liberty:


"Liberty" is a poetic term for property rights.

Therefore there are only TWO KINDS OF LAWS:

- those that protect property rights,

- and those that attack property rights.

"Have the government do unto others and their property as you'd have the government do unto you, and your property."

Give the guy a chance. Be positive. That is the answer to happiness.

Originally Posted by Guest

I said the event was written twice . Apparently no one knows for sure that is alive and willing to talk about it.

However we have learned that Assad had hidden his cache of poisons well until he used them on his was able to successfully hide people. We know Saddam was able to successfully hide aircraft in the desert and we know that Saddam openly used chemical weapon against the Kurds We know WMD can fit in a military truck and be transported easily.

All I am suggesting is that Saddam had plenty of time to moved every trace of his WMD given Bush's delay in moving forward with his plan to go into Iraq .

Washington people are forced to say no WMD because it is difficult to disprove a negative

Personal Best Regards

What a ridiculous post. Even George Bush and Dick Cheney admit there were no weapons of mass destruction. The only idiot saying otherwise is Sean Hannity and we all know what a nutjob he is.

Originally Posted by Guest

What a ridiculous post. Even George Bush and Dick Cheney admit there were no weapons of mass destruction. The only idiot saying otherwise is Sean Hannity and we all know what a nutjob he is.

You sure about that, hypocritehunter is a wingnut troll

Originally Posted by Guest

I said the event was written twice . Apparently no one knows for sure that is alive and willing to talk about it.

However we have learned that Assad had hidden his cache of poisons well until he used them on his was able to successfully hide people. We know Saddam was able to successfully hide aircraft in the desert and we know that Saddam openly used chemical weapon against the Kurds We know WMD can fit in a military truck and be transported easily.

All I am suggesting is that Saddam had plenty of time to moved every trace of his WMD given Bush's delay in moving forward with his plan to go into Iraq .

Washington people are forced to say no WMD because it is difficult to disprove a negative

Personal Best Regards

You don't KNOW that ANY of that was true...you saw it on the "news" and the "news" is often faked.

Maybe...and maybe not. Again, you heard it on the "news".

Unless you're standing there watching...you don't KNOW what happened. You "know" what you were told by someone else. What agenda could they have?

Originally Posted by Guest

Exactly. The one question that no liberal has been able to answer, other than denial is; if there were no WMDs in Iraq, how do they explain away those thousands of bodies in mass graves of people killed by gas?

Again...you saw bodies on the "news"...it could be true or it could be false. The government/media lies a lot.

We really can't know what is true and what isn't.

Originally Posted by Guest

What a ridiculous post. Even George Bush and Dick Cheney admit there were no weapons of mass destruction. The only idiot saying otherwise is Sean Hannity and we all know what a nutjob he is.

In this we agree...he's an obvious shill.