Originally Posted by Guest

Because it is the taxpayer's (the collective group of taxpayers, the 52% that pay taxes), plane. The OP never said that it was HIS plane.

I guess the op is not a taxpayer.

Originally Posted by Guest

Empty rhetoric. Her plan will cost thousands of jobs and increase the welfare rolls. But hey, the Clintons will still have their millions, so it really isn't a problem is it?

You said the same thing about OBAMA, lets see what was bush 43 unemployment rate.

"When Obama assumed office, the unemployment rate was still rising sharply. It topped out at 10 percent in October 2009, hovering just below that level for the next year, before beginning a steady decline at the end of 2010 that has persisted into early-2016 and breaking through the 5 percent mark at the beginning of 2016."

Far from over. LOL

Originally Posted by Guest

You and your ilk will be the first to bitch when your electric bills triple. What about the poor who can't afford the luxury of higher electric bills? Who pays their bills?

So your answer is pollute the air, you don't think much of your children or grandchildren, if you have any.

Originally Posted by Guest

So your answer is pollute the air, you don't think much of your children or grandchildren, if you have any.

If you are SO concerned about air pollution, then stop driving your car and operating your electric golf cart - which probably receives its electrical charge indirectly from a coal-fired electric plant.

Originally Posted by Guest

So your answer is pollute the air, you don't think much of your children or grandchildren, if you have any.

It doesn't seem to bother the Obamas or Hollywood celebrities who fly their planes all around the world, so I guess I can endure the air pollution if those left-wing hypocrites can.

Originally Posted by Guest

If you are SO concerned about air pollution, then stop driving your car and operating your electric golf cart - which probably receives its electrical charge indirectly from a coal-fired electric plant.

We are reducing the pollution in cars, coal fired electric plants are being closed. Why don't you acknowledge the problem rather than burying your head in the sand.

Originally Posted by Guest

You said the same thing about OBAMA, lets see what was bush 43 unemployment rate.

"When Obama assumed office, the unemployment rate was still rising sharply. It topped out at 10 percent in October 2009, hovering just below that level for the next year, before beginning a steady decline at the end of 2010 that has persisted into early-2016 and breaking through the 5 percent mark at the beginning of 2016."

According to the economists, during Bush's two terms, he had what they consider NO UNEMPLOYMENT, it was so low. That was until his last two years when congress was dominated by the Democrat majority.

Obama not only has had the worst GDP growth of any previous president in history, but he also has the highest rate of NON-employment of work age citizens. If you count those that quit the work force with the one registered for unemployment, he has a record high unemployment.

He also has a record number of food stamp recipients.

SO, before inserting your foot in your mouth and getting rebuffed, you might want to check the veracity of the liberal talking points you are using.

Originally Posted by Guest

According to the economists, during Bush's two terms, he had what they consider NO UNEMPLOYMENT, it was so low. That was until his last two years when congress was dominated by the Democrat majority.

Obama not only has had the worst GDP growth of any previous president in history, but he also has the highest rate of NON-employment of work age citizens. If you count those that quit the work force with the one registered for unemployment, he has a record high unemployment.

He also has a record number of food stamp recipients.

SO, before inserting your foot in your mouth and getting rebuffed, you might want to check the veracity of the liberal talking points you are using.

A perfect repub, never let the facts get in the way of their lies.

Originally Posted by Guest

We are reducing the pollution in cars, coal fired electric plants are being closed. Why don't you acknowledge the problem rather than burying your head in the sand.

Save your self-righteous speech for someone else. I have a 2009 Honda CR-V that I bought new in February 2009. It currently has 8,143 miles on it - that's less than 95 miles traveled per month.

I do not own a golf car and ride a bicycle or walk almost ever I go. How does YOUR carbon foot print stack up to mine?

Originally Posted by Guest

A perfect repub, never let the facts get in the way of their lies.

Right. If you had half a brain, you could run along with Hillary as her VP. THen the two of you would equal one brain....or almost.

Remember, Google is your friend. Don't be embarrassed to be called out on your erroneous liberal talking points. Not everyone is as ignorant as your liberal welfare recipients or illegal aliens.

Originally Posted by Guest

If we could back to screen names I would.

Go for it, put it in your signature.

Originally Posted by Guest

Because it is the taxpayer's (the collective group of taxpayers, the 52% that pay taxes), plane. The OP never said that it was HIS plane.

Less than that now...over 50% now receive benefits.

Originally Posted by Guest

You and your ilk will be the first to bitch when your electric bills triple. What about the poor who can't afford the luxury of higher electric bills? Who pays their bills?

MOST of the Ds won't see a raise, they're on welfare and we will end up paying for it.

Originally Posted by Guest

So your answer is pollute the air, you don't think much of your children or grandchildren, if you have any.

How about America becoming 3rd world by the invasion of hispanics...you don't think much of your children or grandchildren. The changing demographics is a MUCH bigger and more important problem for this nation.

Originally Posted by Guest

We are reducing the pollution in cars, coal fired electric plants are being closed. Why don't you acknowledge the problem rather than burying your head in the sand.

What "problem"? The air is much cleaner than back in the 60s.

Originally Posted by Guest

Save your self-righteous speech for someone else. I have a 2009 Honda CR-V that I bought new in February 2009. It currently has 8,143 miles on it - that's less than 95 miles traveled per month.

I do not own a golf car and ride a bicycle or walk almost ever I go. How does YOUR carbon foot print stack up to mine?

"Carbon footprint", the con to get MORE money from the taxpayers and consumers. As Obama and family jet set around the world they cry for US to cut back...you fools...you believe them.

Originally Posted by Guest

"Carbon footprint", the con to get MORE money from the taxpayers and consumers. As Obama and family jet set around the world they cry for US to cut back...you fools...you believe them.

You're right. They are the reason for all the polution. Why doesn't he know that?
Maybe if he tweeted instead instead of shoring up relationships in other countries and working on a global level, polution would go away.
Damn that plane.

Originally Posted by Guest

You're right. They are the reason for all the polution. Why doesn't he know that?
Maybe if he tweeted instead instead of shoring up relationships in other countries and working on a global level, polution would go away.
Damn that plane.

Obama has accomplished little if anything in is world travels. He might as well save the jet fuel (and taxpayer dollars) and just stay in the U.S.

Originally Posted by Guest

Obama has accomplished little if anything in is world travels. He might as well save the jet fuel (and taxpayer dollars) and just stay in the U.S.

And how do you know that?
You know all the private conversations too.