Since before the Iowa caucus, I have been saying what this article says and personally I feel a sense of some relief or something when I read this being published FINALLY in some type of national record.

I dont know how much I can cut and paste here but will try and I am sure if I overdo it, I will be told about it...
___________

"Why is President Barack Obama in such a hurry to get his socialized medicine bill passed?

Because he and his cunning circle realize some basic truths:

The American people in their unimaginable kindness and trust voted for a pig in a poke in 2008. They wanted so much to believe Barack Obama was somehow better and different from other ultra-leftists that they simply took him on faith.

They ignored his anti-white writings in his books. They ignored his quiet acceptance of hysterical anti-American diatribes by his minister, Jeremiah Wright.

They ignored his refusal to explain years at a time of his life as a student. They ignored his ultra-left record as a "community organizer," Illinois state legislator, and Senator.

The American people ignored his total zero of an academic record as a student and teacher, his complete lack of scholarship when he was being touted as a scholar. "
__________

If you read his autobiographies (yes that is plural) there is so much to question and follow up on and when you do, you cannot imagine how this man even got the nomination.
_________________________

"Now, the American people are starting to wake up to the truth. Barack Obama is a super likeable super leftist, not a fan of this country, way, way too cozy with the terrorist leaders in the Middle East, way beyond naïveté, all the way into active destruction of our interests and our allies and our future.

The American people have already awakened to the truth that the stimulus bill -- a great idea in theory -- was really an immense bribe to Democrat interest groups, and in no way an effort to help all Americans."

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/0...igured-him-out

Originally Posted by Bucco

Since before the Iowa caucus, I have been saying what this article says and personally I feel a sense of some relief or something when I read this being published FINALLY in some type of national record.

I dont know how much I can cut and paste here but will try and I am sure if I overdo it, I will be told about it...
___________

"Why is President Barack Obama in such a hurry to get his socialized medicine bill passed?

Because he and his cunning circle realize some basic truths:

The American people in their unimaginable kindness and trust voted for a pig in a poke in 2008. They wanted so much to believe Barack Obama was somehow better and different from other ultra-leftists that they simply took him on faith.

They ignored his anti-white writings in his books. They ignored his quiet acceptance of hysterical anti-American diatribes by his minister, Jeremiah Wright.

They ignored his refusal to explain years at a time of his life as a student. They ignored his ultra-left record as a "community organizer," Illinois state legislator, and Senator.

The American people ignored his total zero of an academic record as a student and teacher, his complete lack of scholarship when he was being touted as a scholar. "
__________

If you read his autobiographies (yes that is plural) there is so much to question and follow up on and when you do, you cannot imagine how this man even got the nomination.
_________________________

"Now, the American people are starting to wake up to the truth. Barack Obama is a super likeable super leftist, not a fan of this country, way, way too cozy with the terrorist leaders in the Middle East, way beyond naïveté, all the way into active destruction of our interests and our allies and our future.

The American people have already awakened to the truth that the stimulus bill -- a great idea in theory -- was really an immense bribe to Democrat interest groups, and in no way an effort to help all Americans."

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/0...igured-him-out

The venom still keeps coming out of you. You finally found someone that wrote something you agree with. Am very happy for you. Maybe you wish we have the former president back in, since he was such a savior?? Get Texas to secede, and you can move there and have that leadership again.

Originally Posted by RCT

The venom still keeps coming out of you. You finally found someone that wrote something you agree with. Am very happy for you. Maybe you wish we have the former president back in, since he was such a savior?? Get Texas to secede, and you can move there and have that leadership again.

As I said during the campaign when all the Obama supporters DID NOT TALK ABOUT HIS QUALIFICATIONS OR PLANS BUT ONLY ABOUT BUSH...I was not a supporter of Bush and was not very excited about McCain, but I did research on Obama and he is making all of my points much more quickly than I expected.

I assume from your comments that you are completely on board with this Presidency and all he has lied about and done....right ?

Those who voted for Obama as an anti Bush thing are simply lazy !

PS: The silence of those who were on here every day excuding passion for Obama during the campaign about what is happening is so loud. Why are you not even speaking of what is actually happening in this country ?

Originally Posted by Bucco

As I said during the campaign when all the Obama supporters DID NOT TALK ABOUT HIS QUALIFICATIONS OR PLANS BUT ONLY ABOUT BUSH...I was not a supporter of Bush and was not very excited about McCain, but I did research on Obama and he is making all of my points much more quickly than I expected.

I assume from your comments that you are completely on board with this Presidency and all he has lied about and done....right ?

Those who voted for Obama as an anti Bush thing are simply lazy !

PS: The silence of those who were on here every day excuding passion for Obama during the campaign about what is happening is so loud. Why are you not even speaking of what is actually happening in this country ?

amazing, that the saying about you might not support the war, but you should support our troops, doesn't carry over to you might not agree with the president, but you should support him. No, I don't agree with everything the president has done. But, I didn't see you talking about the Bush lies. your agenda and feelings about Obama are very simple to understand. you can cover it up with all the rhetoric you want to, but the underlying sentiment is as plain as the nose on your face.

Originally Posted by RCT

amazing, that the saying about you might not support the war, but you should support our troops, doesn't carry over to you might not agree with the president, but you should support him. No, I don't agree with everything the president has done. But, I didn't see you talking about the Bush lies. your agenda and feelings about Obama are very simple to understand. you can cover it up with all the rhetoric you want to, but the underlying sentiment is as plain as the nose on your face.

WOW...speaking of hate !!

First of all, BUSH IS NOT PRESIDENT ANYMORE, and this board did not exist much during his presidency thus you have absolutely no idea of what I said or may have said about his policies. However, you do feel enlightened enough to make your accusation about me.

My agenda,as you call it, with Obama has nothing to do with race, party, or even his personal character...I HAVE DOWN THAT ROAD AND HAVE THE PMS AND POSTS TO SHOW YOU WHERE THOSE ACCUSATIONS ARE FIRST THING I HEAR.....my objection is to his idealogy which has been evident since he was a young man...the only part race plays in any of this is his OBVIOUS involvement with the Trinity church for 20 years that HAD TO, depsite your protestations, have an influence...although most folks think he simply joined that church for POLITICAL reasons but did embrace the pastor in public as his mentor.

No, you do not know me and I wish you would take your passion that you show in slamming me and making assumptions and come on here and defend what you think needs defending.

Originally Posted by Bucco

WOW...speaking of hate !!

First of all, BUSH IS NOT PRESIDENT ANYMORE, and this board did not exist much during his presidency thus you have absolutely no idea of what I said or may have said about his policies. However, you do feel enlightened enough to make your accusation about me.

My agenda,as you call it, with Obama has nothing to do with race, party, or even his personal character...I HAVE DOWN THAT ROAD AND HAVE THE PMS AND POSTS TO SHOW YOU WHERE THOSE ACCUSATIONS ARE FIRST THING I HEAR.....my objection is to his idealogy which has been evident since he was a young man...the only part race plays in any of this is his OBVIOUS involvement with the Trinity church for 20 years that HAD TO, depsite your protestations, have an influence...although most folks think he simply joined that church for POLITICAL reasons but did embrace the pastor in public as his mentor.

No, you do not know me and I wish you would take your passion that you show in slamming me and making assumptions and come on here and defend what you think needs defending.

I don't know if you attend religious services at all, but I really doubt that your minister, if you do, says everything that agrees with you. To keep up this attack on him about his minister, which Obabma DID come out and say he felt what he said was very wrong, and STEPPED away from his church, is ridiculous. Let it go, man. And, the only way I know you, is from your posts. So if you don't want anyone to disagree with you, you have two choices. One, to change your thinking and opinions, which you won't, and shouldn't do. Or two, to stop posting, which you shouldn't do either. How ironic, that you get upset with me voicing my opinion about your posts and thinking, because in your words, I don't know you. But, you can post anything you want about our President, and his thinking. without you knowing him!!! This seems like a double standard. You can towards someone else, but nobody can towards you??? That's really sad.

Originally Posted by Bucco

Since before the Iowa caucus, I have been saying what this article says and personally I feel a sense of some relief or something when I read this being published FINALLY in some type of national record.

I dont know how much I can cut and paste here but will try and I am sure if I overdo it, I will be told about it...
___________

"Why is President Barack Obama in such a hurry to get his socialized medicine bill passed?

Because he and his cunning circle realize some basic truths:

The American people in their unimaginable kindness and trust voted for a pig in a poke in 2008. They wanted so much to believe Barack Obama was somehow better and different from other ultra-leftists that they simply took him on faith.

They ignored his anti-white writings in his books. They ignored his quiet acceptance of hysterical anti-American diatribes by his minister, Jeremiah Wright.

They ignored his refusal to explain years at a time of his life as a student. They ignored his ultra-left record as a "community organizer," Illinois state legislator, and Senator.

The American people ignored his total zero of an academic record as a student and teacher, his complete lack of scholarship when he was being touted as a scholar. "
__________

If you read his autobiographies (yes that is plural) there is so much to question and follow up on and when you do, you cannot imagine how this man even got the nomination.
_________________________

"Now, the American people are starting to wake up to the truth. Barack Obama is a super likeable super leftist, not a fan of this country, way, way too cozy with the terrorist leaders in the Middle East, way beyond naïveté, all the way into active destruction of our interests and our allies and our future.

The American people have already awakened to the truth that the stimulus bill -- a great idea in theory -- was really an immense bribe to Democrat interest groups, and in no way an effort to help all Americans."

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/0...igured-him-out

Bucco....it does not surprise me that your insightful post would receive an ad hominem attack from the far left. Those who cannot defend the indefensible and the facts that define the truth....attack the messenger. Classic Alinskyesque tactic right out of the Rules for Radicals. To them the truth is "venom". Perhaps someone from the left would like to argue the points in your post instead of attacking the man. Now that would be a fun debate and great mental exercise. Thanks for the courage to post emerging truths.

Originally Posted by cabo35

Bucco....it does not surprise me that your insightful post would receive an ad hominem attack from the far left. Those who cannot defend the indefensible and the facts that define the truth....attack the messenger. Classic Alinskyesque tactic right out of the Rules for Radicals. To them the truth is "venom". Perhaps someone from the left would like to argue the points in your post instead of attacking the man. Now that would be a fun debate and great mental exercise. Thanks for the courage to post emerging truths.

I am not far left, as you put it. My point is, that is seems ok for people on here to attack Obama, or whoever for what they say and do. But, when someone wants to say something about THEM, by what we see in their posts, then it is an attack. What is the difference? Again, it's a double standard. Also, unless you are in the inner circle, I don't care how much you read, you are still at the will of the press as to what you ACTUALLY know. For people to post on here, and say they know this or that, are tunnel-visioned. If you have thin skin, and can't take when someone disagrees with your post, or sees something in your post that gives them an opinion of you, that's too bad. How do you think YOU get an opinion of a president? By the same way, hearing reports, reading articles, etc etc. So, what's good for the goose, is good for the gander. Don't expect everyone to agree with the way you think.

Originally Posted by RCT

I am not far left, as you put it. My point is, that is seems ok for people on here to attack Obama, or whoever for what they say and do. But, when someone wants to say something about THEM, by what we see in their posts, then it is an attack. What is the difference? Again, it's a double standard. Also, unless you are in the inner circle, I don't care how much you read, you are still at the will of the press as to what you ACTUALLY know. For people to post on here, and say they know this or that, are tunnel-visioned. If you have thin skin, and can't take when someone disagrees with your post, or sees something in your post that gives them an opinion of you, that's too bad. How do you think YOU get an opinion of a president? By the same way, hearing reports, reading articles, etc etc. So, what's good for the goose, is good for the gander. Don't expect everyone to agree with the way you think.

Biggest difference for your consideration is this....

President Obama is an elected public official and I am not !

You may disagree with me on anything (many do and have) but to equate a personal attack on me (and by inference my pastor) to vetting and discussing a man who made himself a public person by running for office speaks volumes !

Originally Posted by Bucco

Biggest difference for your consideration is this....

President Obama is an elected public official and I am not !

You may disagree with me on anything (many do and have) but to equate a personal attack on me (and by inference my pastor) to vetting and discussing a man who made himself a public person by running for office speaks volumes !

IF you post on a public board, then you are open to criticism. Period. I did not attack your pastor, simply said I doubt if everything YOUR pastor says and does agrees with you. That's human nature. amazing, that you, and Cabo, and many others can throw around all sorts of comments, far left, radical, etc etc. without any consideration of, in your words, KNOWING me, but when it is directed at you, then the story is different. You can have any opinion you want as far as I am concerned, and I have agreed with you at times. this is what we have in this country. But it seems, when people disagree, then you say you are being attacked. No different than when you voice yours, but is that attacking?? In your mind, no, and i don't think so either. Again, if you can't take someone disagreeing, don't post!!

When a new administration takes office in '12 or '16, a new wave of opposition to that administraton will emerge.

Until then things will look this way on forums.

Originally Posted by RCT

I don't know if you attend religious services at all, but I really doubt that your minister, if you do, says everything that agrees with you. To keep up this attack on him about his minister, which Obabma DID come out and say he felt what he said was very wrong, and STEPPED away from his church, is ridiculous. Let it go, man. And, the only way I know you, is from your posts. So if you don't want anyone to disagree with you, you have two choices. One, to change your thinking and opinions, which you won't, and shouldn't do. Or two, to stop posting, which you shouldn't do either. How ironic, that you get upset with me voicing my opinion about your posts and thinking, because in your words, I don't know you. But, you can post anything you want about our President, and his thinking. without you knowing him!!! This seems like a double standard. You can towards someone else, but nobody can towards you??? That's really sad.

As far as knowing President Obama or any other politician, regardless of party, the person's sales rhetoric (campaign or afterwards) means very little. What does matter are the actions, and they have been punctuated with arrogance and self-importance. That is a pity, because the potential and opportunity for greatness is there, but instead the trend has been to act as as "benevolent dictator" and snob. After all, the Harvard professor had to be in the right, and the blue-collar cop had to have over-reacted! Discounting the racial bias demonstrated, the class-elitism itself is sad.

This is not to say that previous Presidents did not suffer from the same delusions of grandeur. However, most of them were not so blatant in their separation from the common citizenry.

Originally Posted by SteveZ

As far as knowing President Obama or any other politician, regardless of party, the person's sales rhetoric (campaign or afterwards) means very little. What does matter are the actions, and they have been punctuated with arrogance and self-importance. That is a pity, because the potential and opportunity for greatness is there, but instead the trend has been to act as as "benevolent dictator" and snob. After all, the Harvard professor had to be in the right, and the blue-collar cop had to have over-reacted! Discounting the racial bias demonstrated, the class-elitism itself is sad.

This is not to say that previous Presidents did not suffer from the same delusions of grandeur. However, most of them were not so blatant in their separation from the common citizenry.

Agree with this, Steve. I was happy at first with what seemed to be Obama listening to all sides, having an open ear. But I definitely have seen the same as in the past leaderships in some cases, with this attitude of this is the plan, and that's the way it is.

Hey Guys! It's a beautiful day in the Villages!

Get out and have some fun!!

lol

Originally Posted by RCT

The venom still keeps coming out of you. You finally found someone that wrote something you agree with. Am very happy for you. Maybe you wish we have the former president back in, since he was such a savior?? Get Texas to secede, and you can move there and have that leadership again.

Personal attacks are discouraged here. They are also against the TOS, if I'm not wrong. Any public figure is fair game. Obama is a public figure. Bucco is a member of this forum.


Edit: I am not a moderator nor do I portray one on television or the movies.