Originally Posted by Guest

Apparently there were about 200 protesting---surprise number on such short notice. They were there from Temple Shalom and Pastor from Christian Churches also. It was an informational protest (so it was said) and not political protest. I suppose they meant both parties (D & R) were represented.

I saw about 26-30 protesters, but liberals do like to be "liberal" with their numbers, and generous with other people's money, I might add.

Originally Posted by Guest

I saw about 26-30 protesters, but liberals do like to be "liberal" with their numbers, and generous with other people's money, I might add.

Liberals tend to add a zero to their attendance at any liberal event. They subtract a zero from conservative crowds. Must be a tenant of common core math. Of course, all that fictitious body heat can be used to fuel their global warming argument

Originally Posted by Guest

Unfortunately everything these days is made out to be political. In this case for me it wasn't political. I was supporting my Jewish friends. Coulter also made some additional anti-Catholic statements as well.

Hmm, I am "Jewish" so upon reading this thread, I was somewhat concerned upon hearing of Coulter's comment. Knowing that Ann is conservative and has always defended Israel in the past, I decided to examine the details a bit. There seems to be a bit of misconception of her interview statement. Although, I do not approve of her vulgar wording, I believe some one is using this as a political tool. I am not offended by her statement, other than the vulgar language.

I wonder if there would be any protest if she had said "How many F..ing Christians are there in America, anyway?" I have yet to see Democrats protest anything in support of Christian or "Jewish" principles. I wonder what the protest at the book store is really about. Reading this forum indicates to me that someone is using a false indignation and false morals to further a political agenda. And yes, I am a conservative so lets put that on the table and out of the way.

To the poster that I am responding to, did you ask your "Jewish" friends if they even knew anything about Coulter's comment before you gave them your version? And, do you REALLY have any "Jewish" friends?

Why dont you protest obama do something worth while.

Originally Posted by Guest

Why dont you protest obama do something worth while.

No real point in it. He has never done anything worthwhile and he will never do anything worthwhile

Originally Posted by Guest

Why dont you protest obama do something worth while.

Which post are you replying to?

Originally Posted by Guest

And when might you have protested gangster rap? I have listened to Ann Coulter's hate speech for years. Now I have an opportunity to use my freedom of speech and protest. Thank you for your service and my 3 nephews, current serving, for protecting it.

The last time I protested anything was the current wars in the middle east...

Come on down and counter protest then we can all head to the square for a cold one!

This is the current comment I took offense to

Ann Coulter unleashes her nativist fury on Pope Francis and Catholics:

Sorry, but I'm not familiar with this publication, but based on the way the article was written, I have to conclude that the writer is not a fan of Ms. Coulter.

After reading it, I have to ask, did the founders consider not allowing Catholics to become citizens? Was their concern that Catholics had an anti capitalist, socialistic bent? If those things are true, then what is wrong with her statement?

I am a conservative, but not a fan of Ann Coulter. I think that we can have reasonable discussion without all the name calling and antagonism. But it does seem that the gist of what she says in many cases is skewed by the way in which she says it.

In fact I don't agree with Bernie Sanders on much of anything except when he said this:

“Too often in our country, and I think both sides bear responsibility for us, there is to much shouting, at each other, there is too much making fun of each other.”

“It is easy to go out and talk with people who agree with you.”

“It is harder but not less important for us to try and communicate with those that do not agree with us.”

So can we stop shouting and making fun of each other?

Please stop the name calling and insults. We are all Americans and simply have disagreements on how our country should be run.

In the end, no one philosophy is going to rule. Everything will be a compromise. That is what Reagan and Clinton both understood.

The first one

Originally Posted by Guest

So can we stop shouting and making fun of each other?

Please stop the name calling and insults. We are all Americans and simply have disagreements on how our country should be run.

In the end, no one philosophy is going to rule. Everything will be a compromise. That is what Reagan and Clinton both understood.

Yes. See post # 160

Originally Posted by Guest

Sorry, but I'm not familiar with this publication, but based on the way the article was written, I have to conclude that the writer is not a fan of Ms. Coulter.

After reading it, I have to ask, did the founders consider not allowing Catholics to become citizens? Was their concern that Catholics had an anti capitalist, socialistic bent? If those things are true, then what is wrong with her statement?

I am a conservative, but not a fan of Ann Coulter. I think that we can have reasonable discussion without all the name calling and antagonism. But it does seem that the gist of what she says in many cases is skewed by the way in which she says it.

In fact I don't agree with Bernie Sanders on much of anything except when he said this:



So can we stop shouting and making fun of each other?

Please stop the name calling and insults. We are all Americans and simply have disagreements on how our country should be run.

In the end, no one philosophy is going to rule. Everything will be a compromise. That is what Reagan and Clinton both understood.

In the past six years, I have yet to see a compromise where the only party that was satisfied was not solely the left. And they always get their way, and they call it compromise. If they don't get their way, then they become petulant children, like their false messiah in the White House.

Kind of hard not to have derision against protesters that are so ignorant and refuse to be informed or research a subject before spouting off about it. Did ANY of them even bother to read her book to see what it contained? How about the chapter in it that is Pro-Israel? Nope, didn't think so. I am willing to bet that half the protesters have no clue and the other half are protesting purely because they are radical left wingers that care less what she wrote, but that she supports the conservative right. They can't even have an intelligent conversation because they are ignorant. What an embarrassment to the Democrats in the Villages. What a bunch of idiots, that are not even willing to investigate what their radical leaders are doing to them. Blindly following. And shame on the Jews that supported the protest a person that is a better advocate for Israel than Obama. They should be protesting Debbie W. for her turning her back on the Jews when she supported Obama's Iran deal that will ultimately cause many Israeli Jews' lives.

Originally Posted by Guest

Did he fight with Castro? Yes or No....

Naughty boy ...you're trying to make it sound like you think Castro is a really bad guy etc when he's probably one of your secret Lefty heroes, along with that Che Guevara shirt you still have in your closet leftover from the 1960s.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ym4Xt0T6fM

The reality is Rafael Cruz is about as anti commie as you can get ... you already know that but seem to enjoy your role as idiot provocateur.

The real reason you are upset by this is Rafael calls out Castro as being a forerunner to Obama, since Castro was the guy who originally used the term "hope and change"

Originally Posted by Guest

And naive enough not to know what you were protesting. Funny.

Yes, that's the impression I got ... several people were asked by friends to protest "evil" Ann so they went. The irony is they don't know what true evil is (eg Iran's Ayatollah for one) and seem to be flummoxed about it.

Originally Posted by Guest

Naughty boy ...you're trying to make it sound like you think Castro is a really bad guy etc when he's probably one of your secret Lefty heroes, along with that Che Guevara shirt you still have in your closet leftover from the 1960s.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ym4Xt0T6fM

The reality is Rafael Cruz is about as anti commie as you can get ... you already know that but seem to enjoy your role as idiot provocateur.

The real reason you are upset by this is Rafael calls out Castro as being a forerunner to Obama, since Castro was the guy who originally used the term "hope and change"

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, that's the impression I got ... several people were asked by friends to protest "evil" Ann so they went. The irony is they don't know what true evil is (eg Iran's Ayatollah for one) and seem to be flummoxed about it.

Originally Posted by Guest

In the past six years, I have yet to see a compromise where the only party that was satisfied was not solely the left. And they always get their way, and they call it compromise. If they don't get their way, then they become petulant children, like their false messiah in the White House.

Kind of hard not to have derision against protesters that are so ignorant and refuse to be informed or research a subject before spouting off about it. Did ANY of them even bother to read her book to see what it contained? How about the chapter in it that is Pro-Israel? Nope, didn't think so. I am willing to bet that half the protesters have no clue and the other half are protesting purely because they are radical left wingers that care less what she wrote, but that she supports the conservative right. They can't even have an intelligent conversation because they are ignorant. What an embarrassment to the Democrats in the Villages. What a bunch of idiots, that are not even willing to investigate what their radical leaders are doing to them. Blindly following. And shame on the Jews that supported the protest a person that is a better advocate for Israel than Obama. They should be protesting Debbie W. for her turning her back on the Jews when she supported Obama's Iran deal that will ultimately cause many Israeli Jews' lives.

You can't see the forest for the trees... and I am no longer going to even try.