Originally Posted by Guest

And yet, the US has not been attacked under Obama's watch, with less than two months to go, unlike W Bush who ignored the PDB dated Aug 6, 2001 that read Osama Bin Laden determined to attack US. Bush's reply "Okay you CYA, now go".

More ignorant BS, from the liberal peanut gallery.

The enemy is not going to attack it's greatest ally, Obama. As long as Obie bows to his Muslim brethren, his weakness will preclude most attacks. That does not preclude all of the domestic terrorist attacks by radical Islamics.

Are you really that ignorant or just plain stupid to think that Bush would have ignored a valid threat of attack? Not even you are that stupid, or are you?

Originally Posted by MDLNB

Are you really that ignorant or just plain stupid to think that Bush would have ignored a valid threat of attack? Not even you are that stupid, or are you?

That ignorant, plain stupid, that stupid, and Bush in two sentences. Make sense.


Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

More ignorant BS, from the liberal peanut gallery.

The enemy is not going to attack it's greatest ally, Obama. As long as Obie bows to his Muslim brethren, his weakness will preclude most attacks. That does not preclude all of the domestic terrorist attacks by radical Islamics.

Are you really that ignorant or just plain stupid to think that Bush would have ignored a valid threat of attack? Not even you are that stupid, or are you?

Bush's PDB is well documented and testified about by former Sec of State Condi Rice under oath before congress

Originally Posted by Guest

And yet, the US has not been attacked under Obama's watch, with less than two months to go, unlike W Bush who ignored the PDB dated Aug 6, 2001 that read Osama Bin Laden determined to attack US. Bush's reply "Okay you CYA, now go".

So, if Obie missed his Intel briefings and did not have an attack under his watch, what are you liberals complaining about? If Trump missed briefings before sworn in, and Obie missed years of them, then all is good RIGHT?

Can't have it both ways, SUCKER.

Originally Posted by Guest

Bush's PDB is well documented and testified about by former Sec of State Condi Rice under oath before congress

You have no clue as to what you are even talking about.

Bill Clinton could have killed Bin Laden in 1998 and didn't. Then we had 9/11. Does that make him responsible for it? Does that make him as responsible as Bush, or MORE? After all, he might have saved 3,000 lives if he would have killed the scumbag.

Originally Posted by AJ32162

Well, Obama set the bar pretty low, so ANYTHING Trump does will be an improvement over Obama.

Do you get out much? From Politico:

The latest numbers show the president-elect will in fact inherit a fairly robust economy with the lowest jobless rate in nearly a decade, record home and stock prices and a healthy growth rate.

It’s a radically different position from the one President-elect Barack Obama found himself in 2008 with markets crashing, the financial crisis spinning out of control and joblessness headed toward 10 percent.

Trump instead will take office with an economy near full employment and wages and spending rising. The economy is in such strong shape that the Federal Reserve is likely to raise interest rates again later this month to try and cool things off.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

So, if Obie missed his Intel briefings and did not have an attack under his watch, what are you liberals complaining about? If Trump missed briefings before sworn in, and Obie missed years of them, then all is good RIGHT?

Can't have it both ways, SUCKER.

Only in the alternate universe does Obama miss his Intel briefings. Do a search of Bush's Aug 6, 2001 PDB and you will get 3,050,000 hits, then choose your source.


bush's aug 6, 2001 pdb - Bing images

Originally Posted by Guest

Bill Clinton could have killed Bin Laden in 1998 and didn't. Then we had 9/11. Does that make him responsible for it? Does that make him as responsible as Bush, or MORE? After all, he might have saved 3,000 lives if he would have killed the scumbag.

Bill Clinton never went to war in the wrong country killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people and costing the US five trillion dollars.

Originally Posted by Guest

Do you get out much? From Politico:

The latest numbers show the president-elect will in fact inherit a fairly robust economy with the lowest jobless rate in nearly a decade, record home and stock prices and a healthy growth rate.

It’s a radically different position from the one President-elect Barack Obama found himself in 2008 with markets crashing, the financial crisis spinning out of control and joblessness headed toward 10 percent.

Trump instead will take office with an economy near full employment and wages and spending rising. The economy is in such strong shape that the Federal Reserve is likely to raise interest rates again later this month to try and cool things off.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

And the lowest uninsured rate in US history.

Originally Posted by Guest

Trump instead will take office with an economy near full employment

Are you kidding, the nubers reported are only those collecting unemployment not millions who are still unemployed unable to get unemployment and gave up.

Originally Posted by Guest

Do you get out much? From Politico:

The latest numbers show the president-elect will in fact inherit a fairly robust economy with the lowest jobless rate in nearly a decade, record home and stock prices and a healthy growth rate.

It’s a radically different position from the one President-elect Barack Obama found himself in 2008 with markets crashing, the financial crisis spinning out of control and joblessness headed toward 10 percent.

Trump instead will take office with an economy near full employment and wages and spending rising. The economy is in such strong shape that the Federal Reserve is likely to raise interest rates again later this month to try and cool things off.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Chi, you finally crawl out of your shell and make more than a one liner and you screw it all up.

Please go to the BoLS and get yourself armed with some real statistics so that you won't look so pitiful.

There are over 14 million more Americans not in the labor force than in 2008. And what's today's population?

There are almost 3 million more at poverty level than 2008

There is over 10 million more food stamp recipients than in 2008.

This is the only administration in history that did not have a yearly average GDP growth of 3%. A record, but not a good record.

And you suggest that Trump is going to get a gift from Obie? Sorry, but this is the predominant reason Trump got elected, because of the terrible economy.

Originally Posted by Guest

Only in the alternate universe does Obama miss his Intel briefings. Do a search of Bush's Aug 6, 2001 PDB and you will get 3,050,000 hits, then choose your source.


Bill Clinton never went to war in the wrong country killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people and costing the US five trillion dollars.

I kinda thought you knew how to use a search engine until you said Obama did not miss his intel briefings. CBS, ABC, etc. all suggest otherwise, but they are liberal news sources so you might not consider them valid. There are others.

CLinton? Wrong country? How about Bosnia? He said we would be out of there in six months. You know, that place where Hillary was shot at....

If he would have killed Bin Laden in the ten or so times he had a chance and denied authorization, then we would not have had 9/11. He even admitted that he could have killed him.

By the way, I won't get into our reason for being in Iraq with you, because you would lose and it would be a waste of my effort.

I want to applaud your attempt and success for deviating of the subject. I realize that it isn't one that you can win when comparing Trump with Obie and their taking or not taking their Intel briefings.

Before asking me to prove that Obie missed his briefings, do a quick search and save me a minute or two of unappreciated effort. Believe me, you will find sufficient articles addressing the issue.

Originally Posted by Guest

Are you kidding, the nubers reported are only those collecting unemployment not millions who are still unemployed unable to get unemployment and gave up.

The way the 'statistics' are gathered/presented...haven't changed in over 20 years.

So I guess what you're really saying, is that during The Shrub's reign (as we were in the Great Recession)...he was even more inept than we knew?

And here I thought he couldn't have been any worse...LOL

Originally Posted by Guest

The way the 'statistics' are gathered/presented...haven't changed in over 20 years.

So I guess what you're really saying, is that during The Shrub's reign (as we were in the Great Recession)...he was even more inept than we knew?

And here I thought he couldn't have been any worse...LOL

Actually, economists said that Bush had virtually FULL employment, at least until the last two years of his term. Hmmm, the democrats controlled congress in his last two years, too. Interesting.

Originally Posted by Guest

Do you get out much? ...The economy is in such strong shape that the Federal Reserve is likely to raise interest rates again later this month to try and cool things off.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Do you? The economy is limping along...at best. The Fed has been wanting to get back to their target rate of 2% inflation as a hedge against deflation should the economy falter, not because the economy is in "strong shape" as you suggest, but because it has been growing so slowly. The Fed is responsible for the growth (albeit pathetically slow) of the economy NOT Obama.

So, I ask you what has Obama done to stimulate the economy? Perhaps you can point to his failed $831 billion failed TARP program or his "shovel ready jobs".