Originally Posted by Guest

You understood this woman's point. When Leave It to Beaver was popular it was more likely that when domestic violence occurred, men being physically larger then women, were more likely to get off on charges. You knew she didn't mean Beaumont in particular.
So what is your cowardly response.
Maybe the woman making the post should get beat up. You made her point.

Yeah, Hugh Beaumont was an alcoholic, therefore, he must have been a wife beater. Why else would he have been mention at all? Reference to him did not need to be made for her to make her point.

So, what was the purpose other than to infer that he was an alcoholic that beat his wife?

Originally Posted by Guest

Yeah, Hugh Beaumont was an alcoholic, therefore, he must have been a wife beater. Why else would he have been mention at all? Reference to him did not need to be made for her to make her point.

So, what was the purpose other than to infer that he was an alcoholic that beat his wife?

Twist it anyway you want, you threatened a women that was giving an opinion, tough guy.

Originally Posted by Guest

Twist it anyway you want, you threatened a women that was giving an opinion, tough guy.

And, you can twist my post anyway you want, I made no such threat.

Originally Posted by Guest

No, my EBT card is safe. Thanks for asking.

As you know, Hugh Beaumont was an alcoholic. It was quite common for husbands to batter their wife in the 1950's and no place for the women to go or no options available for them except to take the beatings. Also, it was very common for fathers to beat their children - not the mild spankings but whipped with barber straps.

Do you want America going back to that? Of course not.

I'm sorry that your father beat you. Did he molest you also? And I am sorry that your poor choice in husbands led him to abuse you. But, this is about Hillary and her less than stellar qualifications for president. But, if you wish to discuss the abuse she received from Billy, I can understand.

Originally Posted by Guest

The social services provided to the poor are necessary for the survival of these people. You would rather let them be homeless and starve. Does your minister agree with your viewpoint?

Yes, you and your ilk are becoming fewer and fewer. Thank Goodness for that!

What precisely do you want America gotten back to? An all-white government, women subservient to men, or Beaver Cleaver's father getting drunk after work and beating on his wife who endures it because she has no other choice?

Vote Hillary!

What a stupid post. How could you go from a discussion on Hillary to your fanatical, and hysterical blather on Social Services? And then to take the TYPICAL liberal tact of attacking religion, is just symptomatic of a very unhappy liberal troll.

Originally Posted by Guest

And the lazy, uninformed, could care less, keep the freebies coming lemmings keep re-elcting them.
As we become more and more outnumbered each year the hope of ever getting America back becomes a wishfull dream of the past.

It IS over...the dregs have won, they've bred us out of our own country. Enjoy diversity. Now you'll get to see what a 3rd world country looks like.

Originally Posted by Guest

The social services provided to the poor are necessary for the survival of these people. You would rather let them be homeless and starve. Does your minister agree with your viewpoint?

Yes, you and your ilk are becoming fewer and fewer. Thank Goodness for that!

What precisely do you want America gotten back to? An all-white government, women subservient to men, or Beaver Cleaver's father getting drunk after work and beating on his wife who endures it because she has no other choice?

Vote Hillary!

How about mandatory birth control? Or do you suggest we let them run free and breed as much as they can? Kids are nothing but an income stream to these "people".

Gee...exaggerate much? You act like before the 60s men ruled with an iron fist and used their massive strength to browbeat everyone, to get their way.

This country is collapsing, socially and financially. It started in the 60s when we decided that "equality" was more important than anything else.

Originally Posted by Guest

No, my EBT card is safe. Thanks for asking.

As you know, Hugh Beaumont was an alcoholic. It was quite common for husbands to batter their wife in the 1950's and no place for the women to go or no options available for them except to take the beatings. Also, it was very common for fathers to beat their children - not the mild spankings but whipped with barber straps.

Do you want America going back to that? Of course not.

If all you "welfare people" in America, all 50 million, got into a single "soup line" instead of going to WM, that line would be 9,500 miles long!

And you know what...EVERYTHING worked better then. And no, it was NOTHING like you describe. A FEW men beat their wives and children, they do now too. Women are abusive too, in their own psychological way.

I'd rather see that then the hell hole our cities and now small town are becoming because of the minority invasion. Our government NEEDS a growing population, they import them because white people only have 1 or 2 kids, not enough to keep the population growing. Minorities have large "families", they have lots of children anyway.

The best of times are over...hope you enjoyed them.

How long of a line would the Walton family make?
How long would 40% of the US population make, 128 million? 24,000 miles?
The 2 groups have equivalent wealth but one person, one vote.
The best of times are over...hope you enjoyed them or we can try to make America great again.

Pretty pathetic to ostracize the Waltons. They provide an excellent eervice, and even if their wages are low, they do provide a lot of jobs that keep families off of welfare. And I have yet to see the government mandate that anyone must be employed against their will. So, it you have a problem with the Waltons, then don't take a job with them and don't make purchases from them. Personally, I have no problem with them. Sometimes they are more convenient than shopping on Amazon or Ebay.

And I have no sympathy for the lower 40% of the earners (or non-earners). If I can rise up from poverty level, then anyone can. There is no excuse unless you are handicapped. Not even age is much of a limiter today. NO EXCUSE.

The Obama's of the world are the ones that tell you that you can't do it.

Originally Posted by Guest

Pretty pathetic to ostracize the Waltons. They provide an excellent eervice, and even if their wages are low, they do provide a lot of jobs that keep families off of welfare. And I have yet to see the government mandate that anyone must be employed against their will. So, it you have a problem with the Waltons, then don't take a job with them and don't make purchases from them. Personally, I have no problem with them. Sometimes they are more convenient than shopping on Amazon or Ebay.

And I have no sympathy for the lower 40% of the earners (or non-earners). If I can rise up from poverty level, then anyone can. There is no excuse unless you are handicapped. Not even age is much of a limiter today. NO EXCUSE.

The Obama's of the world are the ones that tell you that you can't do it.

I'm just using somebody else's numbers. 24,000 miles goes around the world 3 times.

Originally Posted by Guest

Pretty pathetic to ostracize the Waltons. They provide an excellent eervice, and even if their wages are low, they do provide a lot of jobs that keep families off of welfare. And I have yet to see the government mandate that anyone must be employed against their will. So, it you have a problem with the Waltons, then don't take a job with them and don't make purchases from them. Personally, I have no problem with them. Sometimes they are more convenient than shopping on Amazon or Ebay.

And I have no sympathy for the lower 40% of the earners (or non-earners). If I can rise up from poverty level, then anyone can. There is no excuse unless you are handicapped. Not even age is much of a limiter today. NO EXCUSE.

The Obama's of the world are the ones that tell you that you can't do it.

He didn't ostracize the Waltons. He made a point. The few Waltons have as much wealth as XX% of Americans combined. Many of those poor Americans have NO wealth at all, so the numbers rise pretty fast. Most of those poor are also minorities. They, all XX million of them get to vote. That's xx million votes to, what 10? (So, to counter that "inequity", the Waltons buy politicians to get what they want.)

Walmart, Amazon, or Ebay? Why not local mom and pop? You're not helping and you're creating more of those 40% you don't want to help.

What we need IS a government mandate, you want to eat, you work. Why do you think we attract and breed the lazy? We pay people to stay home and pump out kids. Are we crazy or what?

Originally Posted by Guest

Will somebody please ask Hillary..... Well they don't have to ask they already know. People far smarter than we and me know exactly what she did how she did it and why. However, what one knows and what one can hold up as conclusive evidence supporting allegations in either a criminal or civil setting is a horse of different color.

The FBI gets one shot at Clinton and they do not want to mess it up.

Clinton and Company are artful dodgers with plenty of political cover in and out of the White House coupled with a very liberal press that does not want to hurt their queen. We have a DOJ that has run cover for Obama and company since January 2008 and in fact appears to assist Obama in his questionable pursuits.

Hence the FBI has been placed in a situation of performing miracles. They have some 147 agents dedicated to investigation Hillary's personal server and more importantly the probability (likelihood) that it was hacked. Only one person (Pagano) has agreed to cooperate with the FBI. will other Clinton staff members fold? Perhaps they are more afraid of the Clinton's then the FBI?

Honorable people admit their errors ask for forgiveness and/ or resign their positions. But most of Washington's political population are anything but honorable. So we the people continue to suffer fools.

Personal Best Regards:

You got the 147 agents number from the Washington Post which later corrected itself. But you still went with it, because it fit your narrative. Try to stay relevant.

. WaPo Corrects Report That Clinton Email Probe Involves Nearly 150 FBI Agents

Originally Posted by Guest

He didn't ostracize the Waltons. He made a point. The few Waltons have as much wealth as XX% of Americans combined. Many of those poor Americans have NO wealth at all, so the numbers rise pretty fast. Most of those poor are also minorities. They, all XX million of them get to vote. That's xx million votes to, what 10? (So, to counter that "inequity", the Waltons buy politicians to get what they want.)

Walmart, Amazon, or Ebay? Why not local mom and pop? You're not helping and you're creating more of those 40% you don't want to help.

What we need IS a government mandate, you want to eat, you work. Why do you think we attract and breed the lazy? We pay people to stay home and pump out kids. Are we crazy or what?

I am helping the 40% by shopping at Walmart. Walmart employs a lot of low earners. It also provides products at prices that allow lower and middle class income persons live at a higher standard of living. Don't listen to everything that liberals tell you. Why not use local mom and pop? Because I would be stupid to purchase the same product at a higher price. I am not a charity for the middle class business owner. When I donate to charity, it is for those that can't help themselves. Mom and pop are great institutions, but they can provide products for the upper class. My budget doesn't allow for excessive frivolous spending when there are better deals. Perhaps the Federal government should stick to that philosophy.

Originally Posted by Guest

You got the 147 agents number from the Washington Post which later corrected itself. But you still went with it, because it fit your narrative. Try to stay relevant.

. WaPo Corrects Report That Clinton Email Probe Involves Nearly 150 FBI Agents

Even if he/she got the numbers wrong, I believe the point is that there are still a bunch of FBI agents assigned to the investigation. Even if it is a hundred agents, wouldn't you consider that a large investigation, Chi?

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz